The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mucinous carcinoma—Just another colon cancer?
Abstract
The significance of mucinous carcinoma has been controversial since first described by Parham in 1923. Previous reports have suggested that mucinous tumors affect young patients, involve the more proximal colon, are more advanced at diagnosis, and have a poorer prognosis than nonmucinous colon carcinoma. More recent reports have refuted these results. In an effort to clarify the significance of mucinous histology, a retrospective review of cases of invasive colon cancer treated at the Ochsner Clinic between 1982 and 1985 was undertaken. Mucinous adenocarcinoma, as defined by > or = 50 percent mucin, was found in 52 patients. During the same period, 343 nonmucinous adenocarcinomas were resected. The mean age, distribution within the colon, stage at diagnosis, and survival of mucinous carcinoma patients were compared with those with nonmucinous tumors. Mucinous tumors presented at a statistically significant more advanced stage (38 percent vs. 22 percent Dukes C lesions; P < 0.01). No significant differences were seen in age at presentation, distribution within the colon, or stage-for-stage survival when the entire group was analyzed. Mucinous carcinomas of the rectum occurred at an advanced stage more frequently (P < 0.05) than nonmucinous rectal carcinomas and had a markedly worse five-year survival (11 percent vs. 57 percent; P < 0.002).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prognostic Factors in Prostate Cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999
Bostwick, D. G., Grignon, D. J., Hammond, M. E. H., Amin, M. B., Cohen, M., Crawford, D., Gospadarowicz, M., Kaplan, R. S., Miller, D. S., Montironi, R., et al. (2000) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/2000-124-0995-pfipc · Cited by 1,239
Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999
Compton, C. C., Fielding, L. P., Burgart, L. J., Conley, B., Cooper, H. S., Hamilton, S. R., Hammond, M. E. H., Henson, D. E., Hutter, R. V. P., Nagle, R. B., et al. (2000) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/2000-124-0979-pficc · Cited by 1,230
American Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic factors consensus conference: Colorectal working group
Compton, C., Fenoglio-Preiser, C. M., Pettigrew, N., & Fielding, L. P. (2000) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000401)88:7<1739::aid-cncr30>3.0.co;2-t · Cited by 599
Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: A population based study
Smeenk, R. M., van Velthuysen, M. L. F., Verwaal, V. J., & Zoetmulder, F. A. N. (2008) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO) · doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.002 · Cited by 555
Mucins and mucin binding proteins in colorectal cancer
Byrd, J. C., & Bresalier, R. S. (2004) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1023/a:1025815113599 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, J. B., Timmcke, A. E., Mitchell, W. T., Hicks, T. C., Gathright, B. J., & Ray, J. E.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-54
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048085073
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mucinous carcinoma—Just another colon cancer? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02050301
- The paper
- Green, J. B., Timmcke, A. E., Mitchell, W. T., Hicks, T. C., Gathright, B. J., & Ray, J. E. (1993). Mucinous carcinoma—Just another colon cancer? Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02050301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.