The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Colposcopic appearance of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions: Relationship to histopathology
Abstract
PURPOSE: The incidence of anal cancer is increased in men with a history of anal receptive intercourse. Analogous to cervical cancer, whose precursor is cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), anal cancer may be preceded by anal HSIL. Although not yet proven, detection, follow-up, and treatment of HSIL may prevent development of anal cancer. Cervical colposcopic methodology was used to describe anal lesions and to determine if HSIL could be distinguished from low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). METHODS: The colposcopic characteristics of 385 biopsied anal lesions were described and correlated with results of histopathology in a cohort of 121 human immunodeficiency virus-positive and 31 human immunodeficiency-negative homosexual/bisexual men with anal lesions followed as part of a longitudinal study of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions. Color, contour, surface, and vascular patterns of anal lesions were analyzed and correlated with histologic diagnosis. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of biopsies showed LSIL and 26 percent showed HSIL. The positive predictive value for anal HSIL in lesions with characteristics typical of cervical LSIL was 7.7 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 1.8-14), whereas the positive predictive value for anal HSIL in lesions with characteristics typical of cervical HSIL was 49 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 40-58). CONCLUSIONS: The colposcopic appearance of different grades of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions was similar to those described for the cervix. Incorporation of colposcopy into assessment of anal disease could aid in distinguishing anal LSIL from HSIL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Palefsky, J. M., Holly, E. A., Ralston, M. L., Jay, N., Berry, J. M., & Darragh, T. M. (1998) · AIDS · doi:10.1097/00002030-199805000-00011 · Cited by 391
Self-citationRichel, O., de Vries, H. J., van Noesel, C. J., Dijkgraaf, M. G., & Prins, J. M. (2013) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70067-6 · Cited by 181
Machalek, D. A., Grulich, A. E., Jin, F., Templeton, D. J., & Poynten, I. M. (2012) · Sexual Health · doi:10.1071/sh12043 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Jay, N., Berry, M. J., Hogeboom, C. J., Holly, E. A., Darragh, T. M., & Palefsky, J. M.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 919-928
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911763502
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colposcopic appearance of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions: Relationship to histopathology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02051199
- The paper
- Jay, N., Berry, M. J., Hogeboom, C. J., Holly, E. A., Darragh, T. M., & Palefsky, J. M. (1997). Colposcopic appearance of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions: Relationship to histopathology. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02051199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.