Long-term follow-up of consequences of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes in nursing home patients
Abstract
PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tubes are frequently placed in nursing home patients. The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively the long-term changes in functional and nutritional statuses, tube-related complications, and factors influencing survival in 46 nursing home residents, mean age 73.6 years (range 19-96). Functional status was evaluated by a standard rehabilitation medicine scale. Nutritional status was evaluated by serum albumin and cholesterol concentrations and by weight. PEG-related complications requiring hospitalization or emergency room or clinic evaluations were noted. Additionally, changes in resuscitation status were noted. The predominant indication for PEG placement was dementia (52%). At PEG placement, 48% of patients had total functional impairment. Regardless of the severity of impairment, no patient's functional status improved after PEG. Nutritional status did not improve significantly. Mortality approached 50% and 60% at 12 and 18 months, respectively, and was significantly related to age, resuscitation status, and serum albumin concentration. All patients under 40 years of age at PEG survived, in contrast to 41.3% of patients over 40 years of age (P or = 3.5 g/dl at PEG or thereafter was associated with improved survival (P < 0.001) as compared to albumin < 3.5 g/dl. PEG-related complications occurred in 34.7% of patients, and the first occurred four months after PEG. We conclude that realistic expectations of what PEG can accom…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effect of enteral nutrition on functionality, mortality, and quality of life remains unclear.
“Nevertheless, the effect on functionality, mortality, and quality of life remains unclear (144-155).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [148]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics
Volkert, D., Beck, A. M., Cederholm, T., Cruz-Jentoft, A., Hooper, L., Kiesswetter, E., Maggio, M., Raynaud-Simon, A., Sieber, C., Sobotka, L., et al. (2022) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.024 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kaw, M., & Sekas, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Digestive Diseases and Sciences
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 738-743
- ISSN
- 0163-2116 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2568
- OpenAlex
- W2088575534
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Digestive Diseases and Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Keywords
- percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, nursing home residents, functional status, nutritional status, serum albumin, survival, dementia, PEG complications, resuscitation status, advance directives, long-term outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Dementia, Enteral Nutrition, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intubation, Gastrointestinal, Nursing Homes, Nutritional Status, Retrospective Studies, Serum Albumin, Time Factors, Incidence, Survival Analysis, Resuscitation Orders, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review