Comparison of the factors influencing interviewer hiring decisions for applicants with and those without disabilities
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Employees' concerns surrounding disclosure are valid; there is evidence that some managers discriminate against individuals with disabilities or make different employment decisions based on disability status.
“Employees’ concerns surrounding disclosure are valid; there is evidence that some managers discriminate against individuals with disabilities (Kaye et al., 2011) or make different employment decisions based on disability status (Premeaux, 2001; see also Hayes & Macan, 1997).”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Hayes & Macan, 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bonaccio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Premeaux, S. F. (2001) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1011117402209 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hayes, T. L., & Macan, T. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
- ORCID
- Hayes, Theodore L.
- Venue
- Journal of Business and Psychology
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 357-371
- ISSN
- 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-353X
- OpenAlex
- W2084601513
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Keywords
- hiring decisions, job interviews, interviewer ratings, unstructured interviews, conceptual model, employment of people with disabilities, person-job fit
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
