The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modelling C and N turnover through the microbial biomass in soil
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SOM fractionation methods: Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms
von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Flessa, H., Guggenberger, G., Matzner, E., & Marschner, B. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007 · Cited by 1,590
Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model
Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W. B., & Cole, C. V. (1988) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf02180320 · Cited by 1,453
Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Theory and models across scales
Manzoni, S., & Porporato, A. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.031 · Cited by 788
Soil structural aspects of decomposition of organic matter by micro-organisms
Van Veen, J. A., & Kuikman, P. J. (1990) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00004497 · Cited by 494
Self-citationHansen, S., Jensen, H. E., Nielsen, N. E., & Svendsen, H. (1991) · Fertilizer Research · doi:10.1007/bf01051131 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Veen, J. A., Ladd, J. N., & Frissel, M. J.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 257-274
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W4242145002
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling C and N turnover through the microbial biomass in soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02205585
- The paper
- Van Veen, J. A., Ladd, J. N., & Frissel, M. J. (1984). Modelling C and N turnover through the microbial biomass in soil. Plant and Soil. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02205585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
