Cited by 1,590Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil and Unsaturated Flow

SOM fractionation methods: Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms

von Lützow, Margit, Kögel-Knabner, Ingrid, Ekschmitt, Klemens, Flessa, Heinz, Guggenberger, Georg, Matzner, Egbert, Marschner, Bernd·2007·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Soil organic matter (SOM) consists of various functional pools that are stabilized by specific mechanisms and have certain turnover rates. For the development of mechanistic models that predict changes in SOM storage, these pools have to be quantified and characterized. In the past, numerous fractionation schemes have been developed to separate and analyse such SOM fractions. In this review, the SOM fractions obtained with such operational fractionation procedures are described in terms of their pool sizes, chemical properties, and turnover rates. The main objective of this review is to evaluate these operationally defined fractions with respect to their suitability to describe functional SOM pools that could be used to parameterize SOM turnover models. Fractionation procedures include (1) physical separation of SOM into aggregate, particle size, and density fractions and fractions according to their magnetic susceptibility, and (2) various wet chemical procedures that fractionate SOM according to solubility, hydrolysability, and resistance to oxidation or by destruction of the mineral phase. Furthermore, combinations of fractionation methods are evaluated. The active SOM pool with turnover rates <10 years may best be represented by the soil microbial biomass and the light fraction (<1.6-2 g cm-3) obtained by density fractionation (if black carbon contents are considered). Most chemical and physical fractionations as well as combinations of methods yield SOM fractions that are not homogeneous in terms of turnover rates. It has proven to be particularly difficult to isolate functional fractions that represent the passive model pools in which the majority of soil SOM is stabilized. The available fractionation methods do not correspond to specific stabilization mechanisms and hence do not describe functional SOM pools. Another problem is that comprehensive data for turnover rates and data for whole soil profiles are only now becoming available, especially for new fractionation methods. Such information as well as the use of specific markers and compound-specific isotope analysis may be important for future differentiation and evaluation of functional SOM fractions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007

Cites

279 of 279 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carbon losses in litter bags may be solely a function of microbial respiration, and other fundamental soil processes affecting turnover such as adsorption to clay and occlusion within the soil matrix were not accounted for.

    “C losses may be solely a function of microbial respiration within the litter bag [109], and other fundamental soil processes affecting turnover, such as adsorption to clay and occlusion within the soil matrix [35, 121], were not accounted for.”
  • The half-life of >25 years considered for a C pool to be inert, and similar times as a criterion for SOC sequestration, seems rather short.

    “The half-life of >25 years considered for a C pool to be ‘inert’ [121], and similar times as a criterion for SOC sequestration [5, 35, 151, 158] seems rather short.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Flessa, H., Guggenberger, G., Matzner, E., & Marschner, B.
Affiliations
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
  • University of Bayreuth (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
2183-2207
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163103579
Cited by
1,590
References
279
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 59
FWCI
60.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Keywords
soil organic matter, density fractionation, magnetic susceptibility, oxidation resistance, light fraction, soil microbial biomass, black carbon, compound-specific isotope analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review