Affect comprehension in children with pervasive developmental disorders
Abstract
Affect comprehension was studied in children with pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) and normal children matched for mental age. Three matching tasks were used: matching objects (a nonsocial control task), matching faces, and matching affects. The three tasks were developed to be of equal difficulty for normal children. Children were also tested for comprehension and expression of affect terms. The PDD children were impaired on affect matching relative to the normal controls. The PDD children were impaired on face and affect matching relative to their own performance on object matching, whereas the normal children were not. Within the PDD sample, object matching was correlated with mental age measures but not with measures of social behavior and play, but face and affect matching were significantly correlated with mental age as well as social behavior and play. Individual PDD children who showed relative deficits on face or affect matching tended to be more socially impaired than PDD children whose face and affect matching was consonant with their mental age. Results are discussed in terms of possible etiologies of the social deficit in PDD children, and the importance of subtypes within this population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The object processing abilities of individuals with ASD are generally reported to be equivalent to those of control populations.
“the object processing abilities of individuals with ASD are generally reported to be equivalent to those of control populations”
From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Braverman et al., 1989
Previous work on facial expression tasks found that ASD groups were not impaired relative to VMA-matched controls.
“This finding echoes previous work on facial expression tasks, where ASD groups were found not to be impaired relative to VMA-matched controls (e.g.Braverman et al., 1989;Ozonoff et al., 2000;discussed further in Jemel et al., 2006).”
From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Braverman et al., 1989
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 183
- Authors
- Braverman, M., Fein, D., Lucci, D., & Waterhouse, L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Boston University (US)
- The College of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-316
- ISSN
- 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3432
- OpenAlex
- W1975396941
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 28605, MH40162)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS20489)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- pervasive developmental disorders, autism spectrum disorder, face matching, object matching, mental age, social dysfunction, social behavior, play, affect expression
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Affect, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Face, Facial Expression, Humans, Intelligence, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Play and Playthings, Social Behavior, Social Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review