The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence
Abstract
PURPOSE: Preliminary studies have shown improvement in fecal incontinence in several patients who received temporary or permanent stimulation. The purpose of this study was to report our experience in sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence and to target patients who would benefit most from stimulation. METHODS: Patients with fecal incontinence were studied clinically and manometrically before, during, and after temporary nerve stimulation. If temporary nerve stimulation was clinically successful, the patient was implanted and followed up for six months. RESULTS: Nine patients (6 female) with a mean age of 50.7 +/- 12.3 years underwent temporary nerve stimulation. Temporary nerve stimulation was successful in eight patients, six of whom were implanted. Of the patients who could be evaluated, three of five had improved at the six-month follow-up visit, particularly in relation to the number of urgency episodes and delay in postponing defecation. All implanted patients had urinary symptoms. Urinary urgency was also improved by stimulation. During temporary nerve stimulation, the maximal squeeze pressure amplitude increased. After implantation, only the duration of maximal squeeze pressure seemed to improve. CONCLUSION: Sacral nerve stimulation can be used in the management of fecal incontinence, particularly in cases of urge fecal incontinence associated with urinary urgency. This study seems to confirm the effect of sacral nerve stimulation on striated sphincter function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wexner, S. D., Coller, J. A., Devroede, G., Hull, T., McCallum, R., Chan, M., Ayscue, J. M., Shobeiri, A. S., Margolin, D., England, M., et al. (2010) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181cf8ed0 · Cited by 351
Leroi, A.-M., Parc, Y., Lehur, P.-A., Mion, F., Barth, X., Rullier, E., Bresler, L., Portier, G., & Michot, F. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000186281.09475.db · Cited by 286
Self-citationElectrical Stimulation and Motor Recovery
Young, W. (2015) · Cell Transplantation · doi:10.3727/096368915x686904 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Leroi, A.-M., Michot, F., Grise, P., & Denis, P.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 779-789
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084593235
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02234695
- The paper
- Leroi, A.-M., Michot, F., Grise, P., & Denis, P. (2001). Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02234695
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.