The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of intraoperative laser-Doppler measurements in predicting the occurrence of anastomotic leak in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing stapled straight anastomosis to the rectum. METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken on 55 patients with rectal cancer or distal sigmoid cancer programmed for elective curative surgery. In all patients transmural colonic blood flow was measured by laser-Doppler flowmetry technique before bowel manipulation (baseline measurement) and after vascular ligation and division. Comorbidities at admission, intraoperative events, associated surgical procedures, and clinical outcome were tested for any association with anastomotic leak. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was 1.8 percent (1/55 patients), and the overall morbidity was 21.3 percent. Anastomotic leak occurred in eight patients (14.5 percent). After colonic division a blood flow reduction at the rectal stump was observed in 42 patients (76.3 percent) as compared with baseline measurement. The mean rectal stump flow reduction was 6.2 percent in patients without anastomotic leak, whereas in patients who developed anastomosis breakdown it was 16 percent (P < 0.001). Mean proximal stump flow reduction was 5.1 percent in the uncomplicated patients, whereas in patients who had an anastomosis breakdown it was 12.9 percent (P < 0.01). A positive linear correlation was found between decrease in blood flow and rate of anastomotic leak. CONCLUSION: Blood flow reduction at the rectal stump is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jafari, M. D., Wexner, S. D., Martz, J. E., McLemore, E. C., Margolin, D. A., Sherwinter, D. A., Lee, S. W., Senagore, A. J., Phelan, M. J., & Stamos, M. J. (2015) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.09.015 · Cited by 560
Braga, M., Gianotti, L., Vignali, A., & Carlo, V. D. (2002) · Surgery · doi:10.1067/msy.2002.128350 · Cited by 405
Self-citationAutonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis
Saeidi, H., Opfermann, J. D., Kam, M., Wei, S., Leonard, S., Hsieh, M. H., Kang, J. U., & Krieger, A. (2022) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abj2908 · Cited by 384
Blanco-Colino, R., & Espin-Basany, E. (2018) · Techniques in Coloproctology · doi:10.1007/s10151-017-1731-8 · Cited by 344
Jafari, M. D., Lee, K. H., Halabi, W. J., Mills, S. D., Carmichael, J. C., Stamos, M. J., & Pigazzi, A. (2013) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2832-8 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Vignali, A., Gianotti, L., Braga, M., Radaelli, G., Malvezzi, L., & Carlo, V. D.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-82
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040082114
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02237248
- The paper
- Vignali, A., Gianotti, L., Braga, M., Radaelli, G., Malvezzi, L., & Carlo, V. D. (2000). Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02237248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.