Cited by 55Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

Studies on electroencephalogram (EEG) in rats suggest that moderate doses of cocaine ord-amphetamine activate D1 rather than D2 receptors

Ferger, B., Kropf, W., Kuschinsky, K.·1994·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine, two psychomotor stimulant drugs with pronounced addictive properties, on the electroencephalogram (EEG) of rats were studied by telemetric recordings from the skull in non-anesthetized, freely moving rats. The electrocorticogram (ECoG) was recorded. Both cocaine (10 mg/kg IP) and d-amphetamine (0.4 mg/kg IP) produced a desynchronization, characterized by a general lowering in power in all of the frequency bands. These effects of both drugs were mimicked by the selective agonist at D1 receptors SK&F 38393 (3 mg/kg SC) and were reversed by the antagonist at D1 receptors SCH 23390 (0.2 mg/kg IP) but not influenced by haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg IP) in a dose which is likely to block D2 rather than D1 receptors. These doses of cocaine or d-amphetamine did not produce stereotyped behaviour and slight, if any, increases in locomotor activity only. Large doses of cocaine (30 mg/kg IP) or d-amphetamine (4 mg/kg IP) produced stereotyped behaviour and alterations in EEG which are, based on previous own studies, characteristic for additional stimulation of D2 receptors. This was manifest in a selective increase in power of the alpha-1 band. A similar effect was also produced by the agonist both at D1 and D2 receptors, apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg SC). These results suggest that moderate, but probably rewarding doses of cocaine or d-amphetamine mainly activate D1 dopamine receptors. This activation might be relevant for the rewarding properties of these dru…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02244852

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferger, B., Kropf, W., & Kuschinsky, K.
Affiliations
Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1994-03
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
297-308
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2105574305
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
cocaine, d-amphetamine, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, EEG, electrocorticogram, EEG desynchronization, SKF 38393, SCH 23390, apomorphine, stereotypy, locomotor activity, alpha power, psychostimulants, drug reward, dopamine agonists
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Benzazepines, Cocaine, Dextroamphetamine, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Male, Motor Activity, Stereotyped Behavior, 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine, Rats, Wistar, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Dopamine Agonists, Dopamine Antagonists, Rats, Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review