Cited by 60Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Morphine attenuates ultrasonic vocalization during agonistic encounters in adult male rats

Vivian, J. A., Miczek, K. A.·1993·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) in rats may communicate "affective" states during pain, sex and aggression. This proposal was evaluated in an experiment with adult male Long-Evans rats during agonistic encounters; specifically, morphine and naltrexone effects were studied on different types of USV by intruder rats exposed to resident attacks and to "threat of attacks" (i.e., intruder residing within the home cage of the resident but prevented from physical contact by a wire mesh cage). Intruders readily emitted USV during agonistic encounters. These calls consisted primarily of two distinct distributions of pure tone whistles: 0.3-3 s, 19-32 kHz ("low") calls and 0.02-0.3 s, 32-64 kHz ("high") calls. Sonographic analysis revealed a considerable repertoire of frequency modulated calls. Different types of vocalizations proved to be differentially sensitive to the opiate treatments: morphine (1-10 mg/kg SC) dose-dependently decreased the rate, duration and pitch of both low and high frequency USV during the threat of attack; this decrease in rate and duration measures was naltrexone-reversible (0.1 mg/kg IP). Interestingly, audible vocalizations were also emitted but were unaffected by morphine in this dose range. Concomitant with the decrease in USV after morphine was a dose-dependent decrease in rearing, walking and nasal contact behavior with increases in submissive crouch behavior and tail flick analgesia. The decreases in rate and duration of both low and high USV and the pitch of specific frequency modulated calls after morphine administration may reflect an attenuation of affective aspects of pain, and the many characteristics of US (rate, duration, pitch, frequency modulation, pre-and suffix attributes and temporal structure) point to potentially diverse functions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02244954

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vivian, J. A., & Miczek, K. A.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1993-06
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
367-375
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2036688202
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA05122)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-02632, R01DA002632)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
ultrasonic vocalizations, morphine, naltrexone, agonistic behavior, aggression, opioid analgesia, affective pain, frequency-modulated calls, submissiveness
MeSH terms
Agonistic Behavior, Animals, Depression, Chemical, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Male, Morphine, Motor Activity, Pain Measurement, Videotape Recording, Vocalization, Animal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review