Cited by 37Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesMarine animal studies overview

Social context increases ultrasonic vocalizations during restraint in adult mice

Lefebvre, E., Granon, S., Chauveau, F.·2020·Animal Cognition

Abstract

Adult mice emit many ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) during social interaction tasks, but only a few studies have yet reported USVs in stressed adult mice. Our aim was to study which experimental conditions favor USV emission during behaviors associated with different emotional states. As USVs likely mediate social communication, we hypothesized that temporary social isolation followed by exposure to a novel social congener would promote USV emission. USVs were recorded in three different behavioral paradigms: restraint, free moving in a new environment, and during a social interaction task. We compared USV emission, with or without the presence of a social congener, in animals socially isolated during different periods (0, 6 or 21 days). Social isolation decreased the number of USVs during free moving, whereas it increased during restraint. During the social interaction task, animals produced high-frequency USVs (median: 72.6 kHz, 25-75% range: 67.6-78.2 kHz), especially when the social partner was active and social motivation was high. During restraint, presence of a social congener increased the call rate of low-frequency USVs (median: 52.4 kHz, 25-75% range: 44.8-56.5 kHz). USV frequency followed two unimodal distributions that distinguished low-frequency USVs (≤ 60 kHz) mainly emitted during free-moving (90.9% of total USVs) and restraint (93.1%) conditions, from high-frequency USVs (> 60 kHz) mainly emitted during the social interaction task (85.1% of total USVs). The present study confirms that USV call rate and frequency depend on behavioral states, and provides evidence that the presence of a congener promotes ultrasonic vocalizations in restrained adult mice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10071-019-01338-2

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lefebvre, E., Granon, S., & Chauveau, F.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Chauveau, F.
Venue
Animal Cognition
Published
2020-01-10
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
351-359
ISSN
  • 1435-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-9456
OpenAlex
W2998809249
Cited by
37
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
DGA (13co709)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
ultrasonic vocalizations, social isolation, restraint stress, social environment, social motivation, social communication, emotional state, adult mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Emotions, Male, Social Environment, Social Isolation, Ultrasonics, Vocalization, Animal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review