Cited by 17Gender Studies in LanguageGender, Sexuality, and EducationMedia, Gender, and Advertising

Sex division of labour in Syrian school textbooks

Alrabaa, Sami·1985·International Review of Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02262586

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alrabaa, S.
Corresponding author
Alrabaa, Sami
Venue
International Review of Education
Published
1985-12
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
335-348
ISSN
  • 0020-8566 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0638
OpenAlex
W2081492521
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Review of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
sex division of labor, gender stereotypes, school textbooks, sexism in education, women in education, gender representation, Arab women, gender and development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review