The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Parallel Proportional Profiles” and other Principles for Determining the Choice of Factors by Rotation
Abstract
The choosing of a set of factors likely to correspond to the real psychological unitary traits in a situation usually reduces to finding a satisfactory rotation in a Thurstone centroid analysis. Seven principles, three of which are new, are described whereby rotation may be determined and/or judged. It is argued that the most fundamental is the principle of “parallel proportional profiles” or “simultaneous simple structure.” A mathematical proof of the uniqueness of determination by this means is attempted and equations are suggested for discovering the unique position.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters.
Cattell, R. B. (1943) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054116 · Cited by 987
Self-citation
Cited by
Kivela, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y., & Porter, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Complex Networks · doi:10.1093/comnet/cnu016 · Cited by 3,235
A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research
Horn, J. L., & Mcardle, J. J. (1992) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610739208253916 · Cited by 1,592
Multimodal Data Fusion: An Overview of Methods, Challenges, and Prospects
Lahat, D., Adali, T., & Jutten, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2460697 · Cited by 1,296
Tensor decompositions for learning latent variable models
(2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.5555/2627435.2697055 · Cited by 779
PARAFAC: Parallel factor analysis
Harshman, R. A., & Lundy, M. E. (1994) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/0167-9473(94)90132-5 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Cattell, R. B.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1944-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 267-283
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W1969082792
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
