Cited by 987Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters.

Cattell, Raymond B.·1943·The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

Abstract

Results of factor analyses of personality have been inconsistent because of the use of different measures (ratings, behavior, questionnaires), biases of investigators, limited sampling of subjects and of aspects of personality, and varying naming of traits. The writer suggests that these difficultie

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0054116

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cattell, R. B.
Corresponding author
Cattell, Raymond B.
Venue
The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Published
1943-10
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
476-506
ISSN
0096-851X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036590551
Cited by
987
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
personality traits, personality description, personality assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review