Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Strong True-Score Theory, with Applications

Lord, Frederic M.·1965·Psychometrika

Abstract

A “strong” mathematical model for the relation between observed scores and true scores is developed. This model can be used 1. To estimate the frequency distribution of observed scores that will result when a given test is lengthened. 2. To equate true scores on two tests by the equipercentile method. 3. To estimate the frequencies in the scatterplot between two parallel (nonparallel) tests of the same psychological trait, using only the information in a (the) marginal distribution(s). 4. To estimate the frequency distribution of a test for a group that has taken only a short form of the test (this is useful for obtaining norms). 5. To estimate the effects of selecting individuals on a fallible measure. 6. To effect matching of groups with respect to true score when only a fallible measure is available. 7. To investigate whether two tests really measure the same psychological function when they have a nonlinear relationship. 8. To describe and evaluate the properties of a specific test considered as a measuring instrument. The model has been tested empirically, using it to estimate bivariate distributions from univariate distributions, with good results, as checked by chi-square tests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02289490

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Lord, F. M.
Venue
Psychometrika
Published
1965-09
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
239-270
ISSN
  • 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-0980
OpenAlex
W1985237815
Cited by
180
References
1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.