The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Johnson-Neyman Technique and Some Extensions Thereof
Abstract
The Johnson-Neyman technique is a statistical tool used most frequently in educational and psychological applications. This paper starts by briefly reviewing the Johnson-Neyman technique and suggesting when it should and should not be used; then several different modifications and extensions of the Johnson-Neyman technique, all of them conceptually simple, are proposed. The close relation between confidence intervals and regions of significance of the Johnson-Neyman type is pointed out. The problem of what to do when more than two groups are being compared is considered. The situation of more than one criterion variable is also considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170701341316 · Cited by 9,973
Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques
Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2005) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_5 · Cited by 1,506
Using Knowledge of Children's Mathematics Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C.-P., & Loef, M. (1989) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162862 · Cited by 1,015
Comparing nonparallel regression lines.
Rogosa, D. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.2.307 · Cited by 274
Tumor suppression and normal aging in mice with constitutively high p53 activity
Mendrysa, S. M., O'Leary, K. A., McElwee, M. K., Michalowski, J., Eisenman, R. N., Powell, D. A., & Perry, M. E. (2006) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1378506 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Potthoff, R. F.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1964-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-256
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W1988078575
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Johnson-Neyman Technique and Some Extensions Thereof. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02289721
- The paper
- Potthoff, R. F. (1964). On the Johnson-Neyman Technique and Some Extensions Thereof. Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
