The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonmetric Individual Differences Multidimensional Scaling: An Alternating Least Squares Method with Optimal Scaling Features
Abstract
A new procedure is discussed which fits either the weighted or simple Euclidian model to data that may (a) be defined at either the nominal, ordinal, interval or ratio levels of measurement; (b) have missing observations; (c) be symmetric or asymmetric; (d) be conditional or unconditional; (e) be replicated or unreplicated; and (f) be continuous or discrete. Various special cases of the procedure include the most commonly used individual differences multidimensional scaling models, the familiar nonmetric multidimensional scaling model, and several other previously undiscussed variants. The procedure optimizes the fit of the model directly to the data (not to scalar products determined from the data) by an alternating least squares procedure which is convergent, very quick, and relatively free from local minimum problems. The procedure is evaluated via both Monte Carlo and empirical data. It is found to be robust in the face of measurement error, capable of recovering the true underlying configuration in the Monte Carlo situation, and capable of obtaining structures equivalent to those obtained by other less general procedures in the empirical situation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1906875 · Cited by 2,837
Guttman, L. (1968) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02290164 · Cited by 1,343
Cited by
Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding
Roweis, S. T., & Saul, L. K. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2323 · Cited by 14,965
Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness
Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.6.2.204 · Cited by 2,383
Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis
Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4278955 · Cited by 1,552
A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111172 · Cited by 989
Distributed weighted-multidimensional scaling for node localization in sensor networks
Costa, J. A., Patwari, N., & Hero, A. O. (2006) · ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks · doi:10.1145/1138127.1138129 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Takane, Y., Young, F. W., & de Leeuw, J.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1977-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-67
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2087196505
- Cited by
- 947
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.