The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some Contributions to Efficient Statistics in Structural Models: Specification and Estimation of Moment Structures
Abstract
Current practice in structural modeling of observed continuous random variables is limited to representation systems for first and second moments (e.g., means and covariances), and to distribution theory based on multivariate normality. In psychometrics the multinormality assumption is often incorrect, so that statistical tests on parameters, or model goodness of fit, will frequently be incorrect as well. It is shown that higher order product moments yield important structural information when the distribution of variables is arbitrary. Structural representations are developed for generalizations of the Bentler-Weeks, Jöreskog-Keesling-Wiley, and factor analytic models. Some asymptotically distribution-free efficient estimators for such arbitrary structural models are developed. Limited information estimators are obtained as well. The special case of elliptical distributions that allow nonzero but equal kurtoses for variables is discussed in some detail. The argument is made that multivariate normal theory for covariance structure models should be abandoned in favor of elliptical theory, which is only slightly more difficult to apply in practice but specializes to the traditional case when normality holds. Many open research areas are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,023
Self-citationThe Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
The proof and measurement of association between two things
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412159 · Cited by 8,039
Cited by
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Self-citationStructural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Rosseel, Y. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02 · Cited by 27,955
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Self-citationHu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Self-citationPractical issues in structural modeling
BENTLER, P. M., & CHOU, C.-P. (1987) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004 · Cited by 5,804
Self-citationMonte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models
GERBING, D. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002002 · Cited by 1,046
Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research
Golob, T. F. (2003) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/s0191-2615(01)00046-7 · Cited by 1,043
Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.989 · Cited by 1,060
Tanaka, J. S. (1987) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130296 · Cited by 982
Fit Indexes, Lagrange Multipliers, Constraint Changes and Incomplete Data in Structural Models
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_3 · Cited by 512
Self-citationExploring short-form video application addiction: socio-technical and attachment perspectives
Zhang, X., Wu, Y., & Liu, S. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.101243 · Cited by 469
Fit Indices Versus Test Statistics
Yuan, K.-H. (2005) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4001_5 · Cited by 415
Teacher Motivation Strategies, Student Perceptions, Student Motivation, and English Achievement
BERNAUS, M., & GARDNER, R. C. (2008) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00753.x · Cited by 366
Social support, stress, and depressive symptoms among the elderly: test of a process model
Russell, D. W., & Cutrona, C. E. (1991) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.6.2.190 · Cited by 304
Employment status, social support, and life satisfaction among the elderly.
Aquino, J. A., Russell, D. W., Cutrona, C. E., & Altmaier, E. M. (1996) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.43.4.480 · Cited by 214
Lai, K. (2018) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1392248 · Cited by 190
Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Kirby, J., & Chen, F. (2002) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3701_01 · Cited by 137
Student Progress in Distance Education: Kember's model re-visited
Woodley, A., de Lange, P., & Tanewski, G. (2001) · Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning · doi:10.1080/02680510123105 · Cited by 60
Structural Equation Modeling on Life-world Integration in People with Severe Burns
Lee, G. S., & Yom, Y.-H. (2013) · Asian Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.anr.2013.06.003 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Bentler, P. M.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1983-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 493-517
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2057237814
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.