The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Orthogonal Procrustes Rotation for Two or More Matrices
Abstract
Necessary and sufficient conditions for rotating matrices to maximal agreement in the least-squares sense are discussed. A theorem by Fischer and Roppert, which solves the case of two matrices, is given a more straightforward proof. A sufficient condition for a best least-squares fit for more than two matrices is formulated and shown to be not necessary. In addition, necessary conditions suggested by Kristof and Wingersky are shown to be not sufficient. A rotation procedure that is an alternative to the one by Kristof and Wingersky is presented. Upper bounds are derived for determining the extent to which the procedure falls short of attaining the best least-squares fit. The problem of scaling matrices to maximal agreement is discussed. Modifications of Gower’s method of generalized Procrustes analysis are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Approximation of One Matrix by Another of Lower Rank
Eckart, C., & Young, G. (1936) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02288367 · Cited by 3,800
Generalized procrustes analysis
Gower, J. C. (1975) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291478 · Cited by 3,267
A Generalized Solution of the Orthogonal Procrustes Problem
Schönemann, P. H. (1966) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289451 · Cited by 2,040
Canonical analysis of several sets of variables
KETTENRING, J. R. (1971) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/58.3.433 · Cited by 896
A METHOD FOR SYNTHESIS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS STUDIES
TUCKER, L. R. (1951) · doi:10.21236/ad0047524 · Cited by 829
Orthogonal Rotation to Congruence
Cliff, N. (1966) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289455 · Cited by 382
The Orthogonal Approximation of an Oblique Structure in Factor Analysis
Green, B. F. (1952) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02288918 · Cited by 234
THE ORTHOGONAL APPROXIMATION OF AN OBLIQUE STRUCTURE IN FACTOR ANALYSIS
Green, B. F. (1951) · ETS Research Bulletin Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1951.tb00218.x · Cited by 205
Cited by
Procrustes Methods in the Statistical Analysis of Shape
Goodall, C. (1991) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01825.x · Cited by 2,047
Nonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overview
Chi, Y., Lu, Y. M., & Chen, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2019.2937282 · Cited by 360
The use of free‐choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports
Williams, A. A., & Langron, S. P. (1984) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740350513 · Cited by 356
Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399702200105 · Cited by 324
Temperament and Character Inventory
Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. (2011) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t03902-000 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Ten Berge, J. M. F.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1977-06
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-276
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2150657707
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.