The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Logit Models and Logistic Regressions for Social Networks: III. Valued Relations
Abstract
This paper generalizes the p* model for dichotomous social network data (Wasserman & Pattison, 1996) to the polytomous case. The generalization is achieved by transforming valued social networks into three-way binary arrays. This data transformation requires a modification of the Hammersley-Clifford theorem that underpins the p* class of models. We demonstrate that, provided that certain (non-observed) data patterns are excluded from consideration, a suitable version of the theorem can be developed. We also show that the approach amounts to a model for multiple logits derived from a pseudo-likelihood function. Estimation within this model is analogous to the separate fitting of multinomial baseline logits, except that the Hammersley-Clifford theorem requires the equating of certain parameters across logits. The paper describes how to convert a valued network into a data array suitable for fitting the model and provides some illustrative empirical examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Self-citationBeitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus
Ising, E. (1925) · Zeitschrift für Physik · doi:10.1007/bf02980577 · Cited by 3,871
Lauritzen, S. L. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198522195.001.0001 · Cited by 2,976
Cited by
Watts, D. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342 · Cited by 1,163
Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory
van Wijk, B. C. M., Stam, C. J., & Daffertshofer, A. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013701 · Cited by 1,161
Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks
Robins, G., Snijders, T., Wang, P., Handcock, M., & Pattison, P. (2007) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.003 · Cited by 832
Self-citationA Survey of Statistical Network Models
Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., & Airoldi, E. M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000005 · Cited by 819
4. A Relational Event Framework for Social Action
Butts, C. T. (2008) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2008.00203.x · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Robins, G., Pattison, P., & Wasserman, S.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 371-394
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W1970493189
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.