The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilevel Logistic Regression for Polytomous Data and Rankings
Abstract
We propose a unifying framework for multilevel modeling of polytomous data and rankings, accommodating dependence induced by factor and/or random coefficient structures at different levels. The framework subsumes a wide range of models proposed in disparate methodological literatures. Partial and tied rankings, alternative specific explanatory variables and alternative sets varying across units are handled. The problem of identification is addressed. We develop an estimation and prediction methodology for the model framework which is implemented in the generally available gllamm software. The methodology is applied to party choice and rankings from the 1987–1992 panel of the British Election Study. Three levels are considered: elections, voters and constituencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parametric empirical Bayes inference: theory and applications
Morris, C. N. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1983.10477920 · Cited by 1,448 · cited 2×
“We suggest using parametric empirical Bayes methods (e.g., Morris, 1983) for predicting values of the latent variables for the individual units.”
MethodPlackett, R. L. (1975) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2346567 · Cited by 731
Cited by
Generalized Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02295939 · Cited by 831
Self-citationSelf‐Priming in Production: Evidence for a Hybrid Model of Syntactic Priming
Jacobs, C. L., Cho, S., & Watson, D. G. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12749 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-287
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2072983788
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
