The assurance problem in a laboratory market
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dawes et al., Rapoport and Eshed-Levy, and Isaac et al. found that a promised refund increases overall contributions.
“Dawes et al. (1986), 5 Rapoport and Eshed-Levy (1989), and Isaac, Schmidtz, and Walker (1989) all find that a promised refund increases overall contributions.”
From The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign (2002) · cites this paper as Isaac, Schmidtz, and Walker (1989)
The field results agree with laboratory results from Isaac et al. (1989), Rapoport and Eshed-Levy (1989), and Cadsby and Maynes (1999).
“These field results are consistent with laboratory results due to Isaac et al. (1989), Rapoport and Eshed-Levy (1989), and Cadsby and Maynes (1999).”
From The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign (2002) · cites this paper as Isaac et al. (1989)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 252
- Authors
- Isaac, R. M., Schmidtz, D., & Walker, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Venue
- Public Choice
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-236
- ISSN
- 0048-5829 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7101
- OpenAlex
- W1990420750
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Public Choice (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Keywords
- laboratory markets, experimental economics, market design, information asymmetry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
