Cited by 69EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesSleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness Research

Polysomnographic pattern recognition for automated classification of sleep-waking states in infants

Open access
Estévez, P. A., Held, C. M., Holzmann, C. A., Perez, C. A., Pérez, J. P., Heiss, J., Garrido, M., Peirano, P.·2002·Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing

Abstract

A robust, automated pattern recognition system for polysomnography data targeted to the sleep-waking state and stage identification is presented. Five patterns were searched for: slow-delta and theta wave predominance in the background electro-encephalogram (EEG) activity; presence of sleep spindles in the EEG; presence of rapid eye movements in an electro-oculogram; and presence of muscle tone in an electromyogram. The performance of the automated system was measured indirectly by evaluating sleep staging, based on the experts' accepted methodology, to relate the detected patterns in infants over four months of post-term age. The set of sleep-waking classes included wakefulness, REM sleep and non-REM sleep stages I, II, and III-IV. Several noise and artifact rejection methods were implemented, including filters, fuzzy quality indices, windows of variable sizes and detectors of limb movements and wakefulness. Eleven polysomnographic recordings of healthy infants were studied. The ages of the subjects ranged from 6 to 13 months old. Six recordings counting 2665 epochs were included in the training set. Results on a test set (2,369 epochs from five recordings) show an overall agreement of 87.7% (kappa 0.840) between the automated system and the human expert. These results show significant improvements compared with previous work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02347703

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Estévez, P. A., Held, C. M., Holzmann, C. A., Perez, C. A., Pérez, J. P., Heiss, J., Garrido, M., & Peirano, P.
Affiliations
University of Chile (CL)
Corresponding author
Estévez, P. A.
Venue
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Published
2002-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
105-113
ISSN
  • 0140-0118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0444
OpenAlex
W2032156141
Cited by
69
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 33487, R01HD033487)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
polysomnography, sleep-wake state classification, sleep stage classification, infants, automatic pattern recognition, EEG slow waves, sleep spindles, REM sleep, eye movement detection, artifact rejection
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Electromyography, Electrooculography, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Sleep Stages, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review