Cited by 193Psychological Treatments and AssessmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Changing rational-emotive therapy (RET) to rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT)

Ellis, Albert·1995·Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02354453

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, A.
Corresponding author
Ellis, Albert
Venue
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Published
1995-06
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
85-89
ISSN
  • 0894-9085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6563
OpenAlex
W1965662090
Cited by
193
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
rational emotive behavior therapy, name change, cognitive behavioral therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review