CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 27Psychological Treatments and AssessmentsStress and Burnout ResearchHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Effects of Group Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy on the Nurses' Job Stress, Burnout, Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Turnover Intention

Open access
Kim, Hye-Lyun, Yoon, Sook-Hee·2018·Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
DOI 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.4.432
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a Group REBT program with group counseling for nurses and test the effect of group counseling on their job stress, burnout, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study with nonequivalent control group design was employed to identify the effect of the Group REBT program on nurses' job stress, burnout, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention. Data were collected from 47 participants from two hospitals. The data from the experimental (n=23) and control (n=24) groups were analyzed from January 5 to April 3, 2015. The Group REBT program was conducted eight tmes in all, once a week, with each session lasting 180 minutes. The effect of experimental intervention was measured for each group using a series of structured questionnaires at each of the phases: Pre-intervention, post-intervention (immediately after intervention), and post-intervention (four weeks after intervention). Following this, the significance of the changes in the scores was tested. RESULTS: =.012). CONCLUSION: The Group REBT program was shown to be an effective intervention that could reduce nurses' job stress and burnout and increase job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Therefore, the Group REBT program can be adopted by nursing organizations to strategically decrease nurses' turnover intention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.4.432

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Irrational beliefs may amplify workers' vulnerability to burnout in the workplace.

    “Irrational beliefs may amplify workers’ vulnerability to burnout in the workplace[12,14,16-19].”

    From Clinical benefits of rational-emotive stress management therapy for job burnout and dysfunctional distress of special education teachers (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Introduction (section 1, page not provided) says nurses with stronger irrational beliefs experience more job stress, and that stress contributes to burnout. It also describes changing irrational beliefs as a way to reduce stress and burnout. This supports the proposed link for nurses, but the paper does not establish it for workers generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The REBT framework contributes independently to the understanding of burnout symptoms and distress.

    “Other REBT practitioners demonstrated that the REBT framework contributes independently to the understanding of burnout symptoms and distress[9,18,42].”

    From Clinical benefits of rational-emotive stress management therapy for job burnout and dysfunctional distress of special education teachers (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Results and Conclusion report that group REBT reduced nurses’ burnout and job stress compared with a control group. They do not establish that the REBT framework independently explains burnout symptoms or distress; the study tested an intervention, not the framework’s independent explanatory contribution. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Kim, H.-L., & Yoon, S.-H.
Affiliations
  • Youngnam Foreign Language College (KR)
  • Inje University (KR)
ORCID
Yoon, Sook-Hee
Venue
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
Publisher
Korean Society of Nursing Science
Published
2018
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
432
ISSN
  • 2005-3673 (ISSN-L)
  • 2093-758X
DOI
10.4040/jkan.2018.48.4.432
OpenAlex
W2891092556
Cited by
27
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
ko
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
nurses, occupational stress, burnout, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, group counseling, nurse retention
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Burnout, Professional, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Personnel Turnover, Organizational Culture, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review