Acute and chronic implantation of coiled wire intraneural electrodes during cyclical electrical stimulation
Abstract
The posterior tibial nerves of 18 rabbits were intraneurally implanted with coiled wire electrodes for up to 9 weeks to evaluate their usefulness for neuromuscular electrical stimulation. In one group an electrode was implanted and removed in one leg while the other leg was chronically implanted. A second group was chronically implanted without electrical stimulation in one leg and implanted with cyclical electrical stimulation applied through the electrode in the other leg. No significant changes in nerve conduction velocities between the time of implantation and up to 9 weeks post-implantation were observed in either the stimulated or the non-stimulated nerves. Little change in motor current threshold was observed beyond 10 days post-implantation. The nerves showed little or no histologic demyelination or denervation in most specimens, although in about 40% of the nerves, a bulbous formation of connective tissue was observed at electrode entry and exit sites with some demyelination in these regions. The spinal cords showed no histologic abnormalities in either group. The gastrocnemius and soleus muscles showed only occasional signs of denervation. One cat was implanted in both the posterior tibial and peroneal nerves of each leg for a 4-year period. Threshold current showed very little change during the implantation period. The nerves showed minimal focal demyelination at the electrode site and the muscles showed normal fibers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These complications have particularly been observed in larger nerve fibers and in chronically implanted intrafascicular devices.
“These events have particularly been observed in larger nerve fibers [4, 31, 32] and in chronically implanted intrafascicular devices [30, 33, 34].”
From Directed stimulation with interfascicular interfaces for peripheral nerve stimulation (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Bowman, B. R., & Erickson, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-93
- ISSN
- 0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-9686
- OpenAlex
- W1967372503
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- neuromuscular electrical stimulation, chronic implantation, nerve demyelination, nerve conduction velocity, denervation, posterior tibial nerve, peroneal nerve, spinal cord, gastrocnemius, soleus muscle, rabbits, cats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cats, Demyelinating Diseases, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Histocytochemistry, Nerve Tissue, Neural Conduction, Neurons, Rabbits, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review