Cited by 66Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchPain Management and Treatment

Acute and chronic implantation of coiled wire intraneural electrodes during cyclical electrical stimulation

Bowman, Bruce R., Erickson, Robert C.·1985·Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

The posterior tibial nerves of 18 rabbits were intraneurally implanted with coiled wire electrodes for up to 9 weeks to evaluate their usefulness for neuromuscular electrical stimulation. In one group an electrode was implanted and removed in one leg while the other leg was chronically implanted. A second group was chronically implanted without electrical stimulation in one leg and implanted with cyclical electrical stimulation applied through the electrode in the other leg. No significant changes in nerve conduction velocities between the time of implantation and up to 9 weeks post-implantation were observed in either the stimulated or the non-stimulated nerves. Little change in motor current threshold was observed beyond 10 days post-implantation. The nerves showed little or no histologic demyelination or denervation in most specimens, although in about 40% of the nerves, a bulbous formation of connective tissue was observed at electrode entry and exit sites with some demyelination in these regions. The spinal cords showed no histologic abnormalities in either group. The gastrocnemius and soleus muscles showed only occasional signs of denervation. One cat was implanted in both the posterior tibial and peroneal nerves of each leg for a 4-year period. Threshold current showed very little change during the implantation period. The nerves showed minimal focal demyelination at the electrode site and the muscles showed normal fibers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02371251

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These complications have particularly been observed in larger nerve fibers and in chronically implanted intrafascicular devices.

    “These events have particularly been observed in larger nerve fibers [4, 31, 32] and in chronically implanted intrafascicular devices [30, 33, 34].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 66

Authors
Bowman, B. R., & Erickson, R. C.
Affiliations
Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center (US)
Venue
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Published
1985-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
75-93
ISSN
  • 0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9686
OpenAlex
W1967372503
Cited by
66
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
neuromuscular electrical stimulation, chronic implantation, nerve demyelination, nerve conduction velocity, denervation, posterior tibial nerve, peroneal nerve, spinal cord, gastrocnemius, soleus muscle, rabbits, cats
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Demyelinating Diseases, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Histocytochemistry, Nerve Tissue, Neural Conduction, Neurons, Rabbits, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review