Cited by 62Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studiesVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Multielectrode intrafascicular and extraneural stimulation

Open access
Veltink, P. H., van Alsté, J. A., Boom, H. B. K.·1989·Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

Abstract

The relationship between nerve stimulation, pulse amplitude and isometric muscle force was measured to investigate recruitment of motor units. Force addition experiments were performed to obtain insight in the intersection of motor unit groups recruited by different electrodes. Intrafascicular and extraneural multielectrode configurations were used for nerve stimulation. Experiments were performed on rats. The common peroneal nerve was stimulated and the forces of the tibial anterior and extensor digitorum longus muscles were measured isometrically. Recruitment was more stable for intrafascicular electrodes than for extraneural electrodes. Especially for intrafascicular electrodes no strict inverse recruitment was observed. Force addition experiments indicated that small overlap of recruited motor unit groups occurred more often for intrafascicular than for extraneural electrodes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02442165

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motor recruitment was more stable with stimulation by intrafascicular multielectrodes than by extraneural electrodes.

    “Motor recruitment was found more stable with stimulation by intrafascicular multielectrodes than by extraneural electrodes.”

    From A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems (2005) · cites this paper as Veltink et al., 1989

    The available copy contains a title and bibliographic records (the passage labeled Abstract, no page given), but no study findings. Searches for stable motor recruitment and for a comparison of intrafascicular with extraneural stimulation found no relevant passage, so the claimed difference cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • No strict inverse recruitment was observed, especially for intrafascicular electrodes.

    “Especially for intrafascicular electrodes, no strict inverse recruitment was observed (Veltink et al., 1989) .”

    From A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems (2005) · cites this paper as Veltink et al., 1989

    The supplied passages contain bibliographic metadata, not findings about recruitment. Searches for inverse recruitment with intrafascicular electrodes and for recruitment-order reversal returned no relevant passage, so our copy does not establish whether the paper observed strict inverse recruitment. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 62

Authors
Veltink, P. H., van Alsté, J. A., & Boom, H. B. K.
Affiliations
University of Twente (NL)
Venue
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing
Published
1989-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
19-24
ISSN
  • 0140-0118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0444
OpenAlex
W1980562509
Cited by
62
References
22
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
intrafascicular electrodes, neurostimulation, motor unit recruitment, isometric force, peroneal nerve, tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum longus, pulse amplitude, electrode configuration
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Humans, Neural Conduction, Peroneal Nerve, Rats, Inbred Strains, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review