The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks
Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2992207 · Cited by 4,289
Spline Models for Observational Data
Wahba, G. (1990) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970128 · Cited by 4,184
Cited by
Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry
Klingenberg, C. P., Barluenga, M., & Meyer, A. (2002) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00117.x · Cited by 1,109
A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21 st century
Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (2013) · Bollettino del CILEA (CILEA) · doi:10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6283 · Cited by 722
Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline
Grenander, U., & Miller, M. I. (1998) · Quarterly of Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1090/qam/1668732 · Cited by 623
A generic geometric transformation that unifies a wide range of natural and abstract shapes
Gielis, J. (2003) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.90.3.333 · Cited by 585
On the Metrics and Euler-Lagrange Equations of Computational Anatomy
Miller, M. I., Trouvé, A., & Younes, L. (2002) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.092101.125733 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Bookstein, F. L.
- Venue
- Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 313-365
- ISSN
- 0092-8240 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9602
- OpenAlex
- W2025734273
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02458311
- The paper
- Bookstein, F. L. (1996). Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02458311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
