Cited by 99Mathematical Biology Tumor GrowthCancer Cells and MetastasisMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

Tumor growthin vivo and as multicellular spheroids compared by mathematical models

Marušic, Miljenko, Bajzer, Željko, Vuk-Pavlovic, Stanimir, Freyer, James P.·1994·Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Abstract

In vivo volume growth of two murine tumor cell lines was compared by mathematical modeling to their volume growth as multicellular spheroids. Fourteen deterministic mathematical models were studied. For one cell line, spheroid growth could be described by a model simpler than needed for description of growth in vivo. A model that explicitly included the stimulatory role for cell-cell interactions in regulation of growth was always superior to a model that did not include such a role. The von Bertalanffy model and the logistic model could not fit the data; this result contradicted some previous literature and was found to depend on the applied least squares fitting method. By the use of a particularly designed mathematical method, qualitative differences were discriminated from quantitative differences in growth dynamics of the same cells cultivated in two different three-dimensional systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02460714

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The standard Gompertz curve could not be distinguished from actual growth curves within the margin of error of the experimental data.

    “The authors concluded that the standard Gompertz curve [29], defined as could not be distinguished from the actual growth curves within the margin of error of the experimental data.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marušic, M., Bajzer, Ž., Vuk-Pavlovic, S., & Freyer, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
Published
1994-07
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
617-631
ISSN
  • 0092-8240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9602
OpenAlex
W1965889901
Cited by
99
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29ca045312-04, 5r01ca036535-03)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA45312, CA-22585, CA-36535)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
tumor growth, multicellular spheroids, in vivo tumor growth, cell-cell interactions, von Bertalanffy model, logistic growth model, least squares fitting, 3D cell culture, murine tumor cell lines, growth dynamics
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Division, Colonic Neoplasms, Female, Kinetics, Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental, Mathematics, Models, Biological, Time Factors, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review