Cited by 25Cellular Automata and ApplicationsOrigins and Evolution of LifeMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

A model of an autocatalytic network formed by error-prone self-replicative species

Nuño, J. C., Andrade, M. A., Morán, F., Montero, F.·1993·Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02460889

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuño, J. C., Andrade, M. A., Morán, F., & Montero, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Montero, F.
Venue
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
Published
1993-03
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
385-415
ISSN
  • 0092-8240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9602
OpenAlex
W1993470938
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Cellular Automata and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
autocatalytic networks, self-replication, error-prone replication, autocatalysis, chemical reaction networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review