Cited by 16Evolution and Genetic DynamicsStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics

Influence of the hypercycle on the error threshold: A stochastic approach

García-Tejedor, Alvaro, Sanz-Nuño, Juan Carlos, Olarrea, José, de la Rubia, Francisco Javier, Montero, Francisco·1988·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

The role of fluctuations on the error threshold of the hypercycle has been studied by a stochastic approach on a very simplified model. For this model, the master equation was derived and its unique steady state calculated. This state implies the extinction of the system. But the actual time necessary to reach the steady state may be astronomically long whereas for times of experimental interest the system could be near some quasi-stationary states. In order to explore this possibility a Gillespie simulation of the stochastic process has been carried out. These quasi-stationary states correspond to the deterministic steady states of the system. The error threshold shifts towards higher values of the quality factor Q. Moreover, information about the fluctuations around the quasi-stationary states is obtained. The results are discussed in relation to the deterministic states.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80049-3

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A replication fidelity lower than error threshold does not allow maintenance of a single long molecule, but shorter sequences organized into hypercycle can coexist with mutants.

    “A replication fidelity lower than the error threshold does not allow for the maintenance of a single long molecule but shorter sequences organized into a hypercycle can coexist with their mutants.”
  • There is a range of copying fidelity which does not allow a single long molecule to coexist with mutants but same amount of information arranged in hypercycle can be maintained.

    “Yet there is a range of copying fidelity which does not allow a single long molecule to coexist with its mutants but the same amount of information arranged in a hypercycle can be maintained.”
  • There is a lower critical copying fidelity below which even hypercyclic organization collapses because mutants overwhelm system.

    “There is a lower critical copying fidelity below which even the hypercyclic organization collapses, because the mutants overwhelm the system.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
García-Tejedor, A., Sanz-Nuño, J. C., Olarrea, J., de la Rubia, F. J., & Montero, F.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-10
Volume
134
Issue
4
Pages
431-443
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061386833
Cited by
16
References
17
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Keywords
hypercycles, error threshold, stochastic fluctuations, quasi-stationary states, master equation, Gillespie algorithm, quality factor, extinction, autocatalytic networks
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Models, Biological, Probability, Stochastic Processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review