Artificial intelligence and the ideology of capitalist reconstruction
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A major driver of AI innovation and development since the 1980s in the US has been the military.
“A major driver of AI innovation and development since the 1980s in the US has been the military (Berman 1992;Morgan et al. 2020 on US investment in AI for intel-ligence and surveilance systems).”
From Artificial intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences (2024) · cites this paper as Berman 1992
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Berman, B. J.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Berman, Bruce J.
- Venue
- AI & Society
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-114
- ISSN
- 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-5655
- OpenAlex
- W2040882438
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- AI & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, ideology, technological paradigms, scientific management, command and control systems, military-industrial complex, corporate capital, Second Industrial Revolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
