How to build and use agent-based models in social science
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ABMs are the cornerstone of opinion dynamics simulation, defining mathematical rules for agents' opinion updates in response to messages.
“Agent-Based Models (ABMs) are the cornerstone of opinion dynamics simulation, defining mathematical rules for agents' opinion updates in response to messages (Gilbert and Terna, 2000; Smaldino, 2023; Lorenz et al., 2021; Chuang and Rogers, 2023; Epstein, 2012; Flache et al., 2017).”
From Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Networks of LLM-based Agents (2024) · cites this paper as Gilbert and Terna, 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CAN HOT SPOTS POLICING REDUCE CRIME IN URBAN AREAS? AN AGENT‐BASED SIMULATION*
WEISBURD, D., BRAGA, A. A., GROFF, E. R., & WOODITCH, A. (2017) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12131 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Networks of LLM-based Agents
Chuang, Y.-S., Goyal, A., Harlalka, N., Suresh, S., Hawkins, R., Yang, S., Shah, D., Hu, J., & Rogers, T. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.211 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Piao, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Li, N., Yan, J., Lan, X., Lu, Z., Zheng, Z., Wang, J. Y., Zhou, D., et al. (2025) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5954414 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
An Agent-Based Simulation of Smart Metering Technology Adoption
Zhang, T., & Nuttall, W. J. (2012) · International Journal of Agent Technologies and Systems · doi:10.4018/jats.2012010102 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Xiao, B., Yin, Z., & Shan, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.06957 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“S OCIAL science research methods often simplify and abstract social phenomena to establish simplified representations [1].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPiao, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Li, N., Yan, J., Lan, X., Lu, Z., Zheng, Z., Wang, J. Y., Zhou, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.08691 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“This method, compensating for the limitations of social experiments, is widely applied in studies across social science [41, 18, 39], political science [27, 60, 64], economics [10, 34], and other interdisciplinary fields [8, 38, 79, 80], advancing their understanding of human behaviors and society…”
- Authors
- Gilbert, N., & Terna, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Surrey (GB)
- University of Turin (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Terna, Pietro
- Venue
- Mind & Society
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-72
- ISSN
- 1593-7879 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-1839
- OpenAlex
- W1978706036
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Mind & Society (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Keywords
- agent-based modeling, computer simulation, social science methodology, emergence, simulation debugging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review