PreprintCited by 26Multi-Agent Systems and NegotiationSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsPublic Administration and Political Analysis

Simulating Public Administration Crisis: A Novel Generative Agent-Based Simulation System to Lower Technology Barriers in Social Science Research

Open access
Xiao, Bushi, Yin, Ziyuan, Shan, Zixuan·2023·arXiv

Abstract

This article proposes a social simulation paradigm based on the GPT-3.5 large language model. It involves constructing Generative Agents that emulate human cognition, memory, and decision-making frameworks, along with establishing a virtual social system capable of stable operation and an insertion mechanism for standardized public events. The project focuses on simulating a township water pollution incident, enabling the comprehensive examination of a virtual government's response to a specific public administration event. Controlled variable experiments demonstrate that the stored memory in generative agents significantly influences both individual decision-making and social networks. The Generative Agent-Based Simulation System introduces a novel approach to social science and public administration research. Agents exhibit personalized customization, and public events are seamlessly incorporated through natural language processing. Its high flexibility and extensive social interaction render it highly applicable in social science investigations. The system effectively reduces the complexity associated with building intricate social simulations while enhancing its interpretability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2311.06957

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Xiao et al. (2023) simulates a township water pollution crisis, including a demographic structure of different agents and township head and advisor, providing analysis of how a virtual government entity might respond and how information transfer occurs in the social network.

    “The research outlined in [Xiao et al., 2023] is centered on simulating a township water pollution crisis.It simulated a town located on an island including a demographic structure of different agents and township head and advisor.Within the water pollution crisis simulation, this work provides an in-depth analysis of how a virtual government entity might respond to such a public administration”

    From Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Xiao et al., 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. N. Gilbert, "Agent-based social simulation: dealing with complexity," The Complex Systems Network of Excel- lence, vol. 9, no. 25, pp. 1-14, 2004.
  2. N. Gilbert, "Computational social science: Agent-based social simulation," in Agent-based modelling and simu- lation. Bardwell, 2007, pp. 115-134.
  3. P. Davidsson, "Agent based social simulation: A com- puter science view," Journal of artificial societies and social simulation, vol. 5, no. 1, 2002.
  4. D. Lazer, A. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A.-L. Barabási, D. Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, M. Gutmann et al., "Computational social science," Science, vol. 323, no. 5915, pp. 721-723, 2009.
  5. A.-L. Ristea, I.-F. Valeriu, I. Stegȃroiu, and G. Croitoru, "Commercial facilities and urban regeneration," Am- fiteatru Economic Journal, vol. 12, no. 27, pp. 99-114, 2010.
  6. A. Omicini, "Not just for humans: Explanation for agent- to-agent communication." in DP@ AI* IA, 2020, pp. 1- 11.
  7. U. Wilensky and W. Rand, An introduction to agent- based modeling: modeling natural, social, and engi- neered complex systems with NetLogo. Mit Press, 2015.
  8. G. Manzo and T. Matthews, "Potentialities and limita- tions of agent-based simulations," Revue franc ¸aise de sociologie, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 653-688, 2014.
  9. M. Alassad, M. N. Hussain, and N. Agarwal, "De- veloping an agent-based model to minimize spreading of malicious information in dynamic social networks," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, pp. 1-16, 2023.
  10. S. C. Marsella, D. V. Pynadath, and S. J. Read, "Psy- chsim: Agent-based modeling of social interactions and influence," in Proceedings of the international conference on cognitive modeling, vol. 36, 2004, pp. 243-248.
  11. J. B. Walther, "Social information processing theory," Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Mul- tiple perspectives, vol. 391, 2008.
  12. S. J. Masten, S. H. Davies, and S. P. Mcelmurry, "Flint water crisis: what happened and why?" Journal- American Water Works Association, vol. 108, no. 12, pp. 22-34, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiao, B., Yin, Z., & Shan, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388685197
Cited by
4
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
City University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
social network dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review