The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rats with low levels of brain docosahexaenoic acid show impaired performance in olfactory‐based and spatial learning tasks
Abstract
Studies were carried out to determine if decreased levels of central nervous system docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a result of consuming an n‐3‐deficient diet, had an effect on learning‐ and memory‐related behaviors in adult male rats. Females were reared on an n‐3‐deficient or n‐3‐adequate diet beginning at 21 d of life. Their male pups, the F2 generation, were weaned to the diet of the dam and tested at 9–12 wk of age. An olfactory‐based discrimination and Morris water maze task were used to assess performance. Whole brain was collected after the behavioral experiments and central nervous system fatty acid content was analyzed in olfactory bulb total lipid extracts. F2 generation male rats consuming the n‐3‐deficient diet had an 82% decrease in DHA compared to rats consuming the n‐3‐adequate diet. The n‐3‐deficient animals made significantly more total errors in a 7‐problem, 2‐odor discrimination task compared to the n‐3‐adequate group. Furthermore, the escape latency in the Morris water maze task was significantly longer for the n‐3‐deficient rats compared to the n‐3‐adequate rats. These results indicate that rats with decreased DHA levels in the central nervous system perform poorer in these tasks compared to rats with higher DHA levels and suggest the presence of learning deficits in these animals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Inverse Relation between Fish Consumption and 20-Year Mortality from Coronary Heart Disease
Kromhout, D., Bosschieter, E. B., & Coulander, C. D. L. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198505093121901 · Cited by 2,177
Collins, T., Read, M. A., Neish, A. S., Whitley, M. Z., Thanos, D., & Maniatis, T. (1995) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.9.10.7542214 · Cited by 1,718
Kromann, N., & Green, A. (1980) · Acta Medica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.0954-6820.1980.tb01221.x · Cited by 713
Cited by
Consumption of Fish and n-3 Fatty Acids and Risk of Incident Alzheimer Disease
Morris, M. C., Evans, D. A., Bienias, J. L., Tangney, C. C., Bennett, D. A., Wilson, R. S., Aggarwal, N., & Schneider, J. (2003) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.60.7.940 · Cited by 1,135
Mechanisms of action of docosahexaenoic acid in the nervous system
Salem, N., Litman, B., Kim, H., & Gawrisch, K. (2001) · Lipids · doi:10.1007/s11745-001-0805-6 · Cited by 919
Self-citationEssential fatty acids and the brain: possible health implications
Youdim, K. A., Martin, A., & Joseph, J. A. (2000) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0736-5748(00)00013-7 · Cited by 517
Essential Fatty Acids and the Brain
Haag, M. (2003) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674370304800308 · Cited by 421
Docosahexaenoic acid promotes neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo
Kawakita, E., Hashimoto, M., & Shido, O. (2006) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.01.021 · Cited by 410
Metadata
- Authors
- Greiner, R. S., Moriguchi, T., Hutton, A., Slotnick, B. M., & Salem, N.
- Venue
- Lipids
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- S1Part3
- Pages
- S239-43
- ISSN
- 0024-4201 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9307
- OpenAlex
- W2021414145
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rats with low levels of brain docosahexaenoic acid show impaired performance in olfactory‐based and spatial learning tasks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02562305
- The paper
- Greiner, R. S., Moriguchi, T., Hutton, A., Slotnick, B. M., & Salem, N. (1999). Rats with low levels of brain docosahexaenoic acid show impaired performance in olfactory‐based and spatial learning tasks. Lipids. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02562305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.