Cited by 70Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareEmpathy and Medical EducationInnovations in Medical Education

Teaching the medical interview: An intervention study

Putnam, Samuel M., Stiles, William B., Jacob, Mary Casey, James, Sherman A.·1988·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

To study the effects of teaching specific interviewing techniques on verbal behaviors and on health outcomes, internal medicine residents working in a screening clinic were assigned to either an experimental or a control group. The entire clinic visit was audiotaped, transcribed, and coded according to the Verbal Response Mode (VRM) system. Residents in the experimental group were taught interviewing behaviors (patient exposition and physician explanation) that had been found in previous studies to be associated with patient outcomes. Through telephone interviews, patient satisfaction, compliance, and symptom status were determined for all patients. Two hundred and sixty-eight interviews (156 in the experimental group and 112 in the control group) were included in the study. Training did increase patient exposition and physician explanation, but did not affect health outcomes. Residents' attitudes and behaviors during the training are described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02595755

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In studies conducted before 1999, attempts to ensure protection from contamination from the intervention to the control group were reported in one study only.

    “In studies conducted before1999, attempts to ensure protection from contamination from the intervention to the control group were reported in one study only (Putnam 1988) in which intervention group physicians were asked not to discuss the intervention with control group physicians.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Putnam, S. M., Stiles, W. B., Jacob, M. C., & James, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Miami University (US)
  • VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
1988-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
38-47
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2312263249
Cited by
70
References
27
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
12.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS 03040)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
interviewing skills training, internal medicine residents, verbal response modes, patient satisfaction, medication adherence, symptom status, health outcomes, physician attitudes
MeSH terms
Communication, Consumer Behavior, Internal Medicine, Internship and Residency, Interviews as Topic, Patient Compliance, Physician-Patient Relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review