Cited by 86Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Depression of elderly outpatients: Primary care physicians’ attitudes and practice patterns

Callahan, Christopher M., Nienaber, Nancy A., Hendrie, Hugh C., Tierney, William M.·1992·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Objective To determine primary care physicians' attitudes and practice patterns concerning the diagnosis and treatment of depression in elderly outpatients.Design Survey of primary care physicians' attitudes using a 22-item questionnaire. Current practice patterns were identified from a computerized medical record system.Setting Academic primary care group practice at an urban ambulatory care clinic.Patients/participants Thirty-five faculty general internists and 118 resident internal medicine physicians who had cared for 2,759 patients 65 years of age and older in the previous year.Measurements and main results Attitudes: Eighty percent of all physicians considered the diagnosis and treatment of depressed elderly patients to be their responsibility. Fifty-five percent of the internists felt confident in accurately diagnosing depression, and 35% felt confident in prescribing antidepressants for this population. Residents reported more difficulties in dealing with depressed elderly patients than did faculty. Practice patterns: Of patients greater than or equal to 65 years old, 8% were prescribed antidepressants, 5.4% had current diagnoses of depression, and 2% were seen for evaluation by psychiatry professionals. Age was negatively correlated with depression diagnosis, antidepressant drug use, and psychiatry evaluation.Conclusions Internists in this primary care group practice accept responsibility for the treatment of depressed elderly patients but perceive their clinical skills as inadequate and are frustrated with their practice environment. Interventions aimed at improving the diagnosis and treatment of depressed elderly patients may be more effective if they are able to improve knowledge, attitudes, and the practice environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02599097

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Callahan, C. M., Nienaber, N. A., Hendrie, H. C., & Tierney, W. M.
Affiliations
Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
1992-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
26-31
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2026757070
Cited by
86
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
geriatric depression, geriatric outpatients, antidepressant prescribing, depression diagnosis, internists, internal medicine residents, physician confidence, practice environment, outpatient care
MeSH terms
Aged, Ambulatory Care, Antidepressive Agents, Attitude of Health Personnel, Depression, Drug Utilization, Female, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Male, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Family, Psychotherapy, Referral and Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review