The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research utilization: The state of the art
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion
Weiss, C. H. (1980) · Knowledge · doi:10.1177/107554708000100303 · Cited by 669
Cited by
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
Nilsen, P. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 · Cited by 4,447
How Can Research Organizations More Effectively Transfer Research Knowledge to Decision Makers?
LAVIS, J. N., ROBERTSON, D., WOODSIDE, J. M., McLEOD, C. B., & ABELSON, J. (2003) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052 · Cited by 1,176
Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges
Head, B. W. (2010) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001 · Cited by 527
Developing a Framework for Transferring Knowledge Into Action: A Thematic Analysis of the Literature
Ward, V., House, A., & Hamer, S. (2009) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008120 · Cited by 511
Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context
Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., & Goering, P. (2003) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/135581903321466067 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Huberman, M.
- Venue
- Knowledge and Policy
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 13-33
- ISSN
- 0897-1986 (ISSN-L)
- 1874-6314
- OpenAlex
- W2050192282
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.