The line transect method for estimating densities of large mammals in a tropical deciduous forest: an evaluation of models and field experiments
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Density of Bos gaurus in Mudumalai Tiger Reserve in 1988-1992 was 14.4 (± 3.8 SE) individuals/km2.
“14.4 (± 3.8 SE) in Mudumalui Tiger Reserve in 1988-1992 (Varman and Sukumar 1995)”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Varman and Sukumar 1995
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 119
- Authors
- Varman, K. S., & Sukumar, R.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
- ORCID
- Sukumar, R
- Venue
- Journal of Biosciences
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-287
- ISSN
- 0250-5991 (ISSN-L)
- 0973-7138
- OpenAlex
- W1967243383
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Biosciences (publishedVersion)
- NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- line transect survey, animal density estimation, tropical deciduous forest, chital, sambar, Asian elephant, gaur, Fourier series estimator, sampling effort, density variance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
