Cited by 423Karl Barth and Christian TheologyReligious and Theological StudiesStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Christian theology: An introduction

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02772296

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McGrath, A. E., & Sarot, M.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Sophia
Published
1995-12
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
97-98
ISSN
  • 0038-1527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-930X
OpenAlex
W1983396444
Cited by
423
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 21
FWCI
28.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sophia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious and Theological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Christian theology, doctrine, systematic theology, Christian faith

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review