Nasal lymphoid tissue, intranasal immunization, and compartmentalization of the common mucosal immune system
Abstract
Mucosal application of vaccines with an appropriate adjuvant can induce immune responses at both systemic and mucosal sites, and therefore may prevent not only infectious disease, but also colonization of mucosal surfaces. Intranasal is more effective than intragastric immunization at generating earlier and stronger mucosal immune response. Nasal lymphoid tissue (NALT) and its local draining lymph nodes may retain long-term immune memory. IgA isotype switching, and the differentiation and maturation of IgA antibody-secreting cells (ASC) may occur before these cells migrate out of NALT, whereas IgG ASC responses require passage of the cells through draining lymph nodes of the NALT. Knowledge of whether immune memory cells can recirculate to and reside in the inductive sites other than their origin after encountering antigen will be helpful for understanding the compartmentalization of the common mucosal immune system as well as for determining the best route for delivering a mucosal vaccine against a particular pathogen.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The nerves are well-protected physically and immunologically by the nasal epithelium which exhibits powerful innate and adaptive immune system components; together with NALT, the epithelium constitutes the first defence against microbes.
“The nerves are well-protected physically and immunologically by the nasal epithelium which exhibits powerful innate and adaptive immune system components. Together with the associated nasopharynx-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT), the epithelium constitutes the first defence against microbes25.”
From Chlamydia pneumoniae can infect the central nervous system via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves and contributes to Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [25]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Species differences in the structure and function of the immune system
Haley, P. J. (2003) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0300-483x(03)00043-x · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Chacko, A., Delbaz, A., Walkden, H., Basu, S., Armitage, C. W., Eindorf, T., Trim, L. K., Miller, E., West, N. P., St John, J. A., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06749-9 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wu, H.-Y., & Russell, M. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Hong-Yin
- ORCID
- Russell, Michael W.
- Venue
- Immunologic Research
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-201
- ISSN
- 0257-277X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-0755
- OpenAlex
- W2047944348
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Immunologic Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE06746)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
- Keywords
- intranasal immunization, mucosal immunity, draining lymph nodes
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Intranasal, Animals, Humans, Lymphoid Tissue, Nasal Mucosa, Organ Specificity, Vaccines, Immunity, Mucosal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review