Molecular Evidence and the Evolution of Maize

Doebley, John·1990·Economic Botany

DOI 10.1007/bf02860472

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02860472

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Documenting domestication: The intersection of genetics and archaeology
Zeder, M. A., Emshwiller, E., Smith, B. D., & Bradley, D. G. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2006.01.007 · Cited by 447
Phylogenetic relationships among domesticated and wild species of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae) inferred from a mitochondrial gene: Implications for crop plant evolution and areas of origin
Sanjur, O. I., Piperno, D. R., Andres, T. C., & Wessel-Beaver, L. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.012577299 · Cited by 240

Authors: Doebley, J.
Venue: Economic Botany
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1990-07
Volume: 44
Issue: S3
Pages: 6-27
ISSN: 0013-0001 (ISSN-L)
1874-9364
DOI: 10.1007/bf02860472
OpenAlex: W1995324497
Cited by: 264
References: 0
FWCI: 3.17
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review