Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phylogenetic relationships among domesticated and wild species of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae) inferred from a mitochondrial gene: Implications for crop plant evolution and areas of origin

Sanjur, Oris I., Piperno, Dolores R., Andres, Thomas C., Wessel-Beaver, Linda·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We have investigated the phylogenetic relationships among six wild and six domesticated taxa of Cucurbita using as a marker an intron region from the mitochondrial nad1 gene. Our study represents one of the first successful uses of a mtDNA gene in resolving inter- and intraspecific taxonomic relationships in Angiosperms and yields several important insights into the origins of domesticated Cucurbita . First, our data suggest at least six independent domestication events from distinct wild ancestors. Second, Cucurbita argyrosperma likely was domesticated from a wild Mexican gourd, Cucurbita sororia , probably in the same region of southwest Mexico that gave rise to maize. Third, the wild ancestor of Cucurbita moschata is still unknown, but mtDNA data combined with other sources of information suggest that it will probably be found in lowland northern South America. Fourth, Cucurbita andreana is supported as the wild progenitor of Cucurbita maxima , but humid lowland regions of Bolivia in addition to warmer temperate zones in South America from where C. andreana was originally described should possibly be considered as an area of origin for C. maxima . Fifth, our data support other molecular results that indicate two separate domestications in the Cucurbita pepo complex. The potential zone of domestication for one of the domesticated subspecies, C. pepo subsp. ovifera , includes eastern North America and should be extended to northeastern Mexico. The wild ancestor of the other domesticated subspecies, C. pepo subsp. pepo , is undiscovered but is closely related to C. pepo subsp. fraterna and possibly will be found in southern Mexico.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.012577299

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The co-occurrence of the squash phytolith with maize in the same sample is significant because it provides indirect evidence for early manipulation of squash in a region where the original domestication of c. moschata may have taken place.

    “However, wild or domesticated, the co-occurrence of this squash phytolith with maize in the same sample is significant because it provides indirect evidence for early manipulation of squash in a region where the original domestication of c. moschata may have taken place (Nee 1990;Piperno and Pearsall 1998;Sanjur et al. 2002).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. M Nee Econ Bot 44, 56–68 (1990). · DOI · Paper page
  2. T C Andres Biology and Utilization of the Cucurbitaceae, eds DM Bates, RW Robinson, C Jeffrey (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY), pp. 102–119 (1990).
  3. L C Merrick Evolution of Crop Plants, eds J Smartt, N W Simmonds (Longman, Essex, U.K.), pp. 97–105 (1995).
  4. Sauer C. O. (1950) in Handbook of South American Indians ed. Steward J. (Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin No. 143 U.S. Govt. Printing Office Washington DC) pp. 487–543.
  5. J Doebley Econ Bot 44, 6–27 (1990). · DOI
  6. E S, IV Buckler, T P Holtsford Mol Biol Evol 13, 612–622 (1996). · DOI
  7. K M Olsen, B A Schaal Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 5586–5591 (1999). · DOI
  8. K M Olsen, B A Schaal Am J Bot 88, 131–142 (2001). · DOI
  9. H D Wilson, J Doebley, M Duvall Theor Appl Genet 84, 859–865 (1992). · DOI
  10. D S Decker-Walters Econ Bot 42, 4–15 (1988). · DOI
  11. D S Decker-Walters, T W Walters, C W Cowan, B D Smith J Ethnobiol 13, 55–72 (1993).
  12. J Jobst, K King, V Hemleben Mol Phylogenet Evol 9, 204–219 (1998). · DOI
  13. N Katzir, Tadmor, G Tzuri, E Leshzeshen, N Mozes-Daube, Y Danin-Poleg, HS Paris Acta Hortic 510, 433–439 (2000). · DOI
  14. K King, J Jobst, V Hemleben J Mol Evol 41, 996–1005 (1995).
  15. B Demesure, N Doszi, R J Petit Mol Ecol 4, 129–131 (1995). · DOI
  16. P Awadalla, A Eyre-Walker, M J Smith Science 286, 2524–2525 (1999). · DOI
  17. D Posada, K A Crandall Bioinformatics 14, 817–818 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  18. D L Swofford paup* Ver. 4.0b8 (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 2001).
  19. K H Wolfe, W-H Li, P M Sharp Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84, 9054–9058 (1987). · DOI
  20. J D Palmer Molecular Systematics of Plants, eds P S Soltis, D E Soltis, J Doule (Chapman & Hall, New York), pp. 36–49 (1992). · DOI
  21. F Gugerli, J Senn, M Anzidei, A Madaghiele, U Büchler, C Sperinsen, G G Vendramin Mol Ecol 10, 1489–1497 (2001). · DOI
  22. J B Mitton, B R Kreiser, R G Latta Mol Ecol 9, 91–97 (2001). · DOI
  23. J D Sauer Historical Geography of Crop Plants: A Select Roster (CRC, London, 1993).
  24. D R Piperno, D M Pearsall The Origins of Agriculture in the Lowland Neotropics (Academic, San Diego, 1998).
  25. D R Piperno, T C Andres, K E Stothert J Arch Sci 27, 193–208 (2000). · DOI
  26. F B King Prehistoric Food Production in Eastern North America, ed R I Ford (Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI), pp. 73–97 (1985).
  27. G Fritz Am Antiquity 64, 417–429 (1999). · DOI
  28. B D Smith Lat Am Ant 8, 342–383 (1997). · DOI
  29. T C Andres Cucur Gen Coop Rep 10, 69–71 (1987).
  30. L C Merrick Biology and Utilization of the Cucurbitaceae, eds D M Bates, R W Robinson, C Jeffrey (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY), pp. 77–95 (1990).
  31. L Wessel-Beaver Cucur Gen Coop Rep 23, 62–63 (2000).
  32. L Wessel-Beaver Cucur Gen Coop Rep 23, 54–55 (2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sanjur, O. I., Piperno, D. R., Andres, T. C., & Wessel-Beaver, L.
Affiliations
Molecular Evolution Laboratories and Center for Tropical Paleoecology and Archaeology, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Box 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama; The Cucurbit Network, Bronx, NY 10471; and Department of Agronomy and Soils, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 9030, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 00681-9030
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-01-08
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
535-540
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
240
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review