Cited by 76Medication Adherence and CompliancePharmacy and Medical PracticesInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

Compliance with inhaled medications: the relationship between diary and electronic monitor

Berg, Jill, Dunbar-Jacob, Jacqueline, Rohay, Jeffrey M.·1998·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Self-report is a frequently-used method of assessing compliance with prescribed medications in patients with chronic illnesses. Most researchers agree, however, that self-report misrepresents patient adherence to regimen prescription. In this randomized, controlled study evaluating inhaler medication compliance, diary data was compared to electronic monitoring in 55 adults with asthma. Subjects randomized to the treatment group received a six-week self-management program. An electronic monitor, the MDI Chronolog, was used in this study to assess inhaler use. The MDI Chronolog records the date and time of each inhaled activation. The self-report measure used was a daily asthma diary. Subjects were asked to use their inhaled medications as usual and record the date and time they administered their medication over a one-week period. Moderate correlations (rs = .55, Mdnd = 95.8, Mdnc = 91.6) were found when comparing the number of administrations calculated using the MDI Chronolog to the number of administrations reported in the subject's diary. When the dosing interval was examined, however, the correlation was weaker (rs = .44, Mdndiary = 92.8, Mdnchronolog = 37.5). In each case, self-reported compliance was higher than monitored adherence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02893807

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berg, J., Dunbar-Jacob, J., & Rohay, J. M.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Long Beach (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Berg, Jill
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
1998-03
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
36-38
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2087661245
Cited by
76
References
15
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f31nr006787-01)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (5-F31NR06787-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Keywords
medication adherence, asthma, electronic monitoring, self-report validity, self-management program, dosing interval
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Asthma, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Reproducibility of Results, Anti-Asthmatic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review