The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevention of sexually transmitted HIV infection: A meta-analytic review of teh behavioral outcome literature
Abstract
Social learning theory-based models have recently provided the foundation for a series of twelve controlled human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk reduction intervention studies that have examined sexual behavior change. These interventions have been tested with adolescents, gay and bisexual men, inner-city women, college students, and seriously mentally ill adults. We report the first meta-analysis of these intervention studies. We found that, as expected, the mean weighted effect of HIV-risk reduction interventions on behavioral outcomes was positive and strongly significant (d+=0.25). Moreover, the studies' effect sizes were consistently positive, ranging from 0.11 to 0.53, and were largest when the outcomes were measured close in time to the intervention. We discuss other methodological challenges that, if solved, should enhance the success of future HIV-risk reduction interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513 · Cited by 18,187
Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review
BIEN, T. H., MILLER, W. R., & TONIGAN, J. S. (1993) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb00820.x · Cited by 1,577
Intention-to-Treat Analysis: Implications for Quantitative and Qualitative Research
NEWELL, D. J. (1992) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/21.5.837 · Cited by 715
Cited by
Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis.
Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142 · Cited by 1,769
Self-citationAlbarracín, D., Gillette, J. C., Earl, A. N., Glasman, L. R., Durantini, M. R., & Ho, M.-H. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.856 · Cited by 792
Adolescent sexual risk behavior: A multi-system perspective
Kotchick, B. A., Shaffer, A., Miller, K. S., & Forehand, R. (2001) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00070-7 · Cited by 671
A Meta-Analytic Review of Eating Disorder Prevention Programs: Encouraging Findings
Stice, E., Shaw, H., & Marti, C. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091447 · Cited by 544
Eating disorder prevention programs: A meta-analytic review.
Stice, E., & Shaw, H. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.206 · Cited by 510
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalichman, S. C., Carey, M. P., & Johnson, B. T.
- Venue
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-15
- ISSN
- 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
- 0883-6612
- 1532-4796
- OpenAlex
- W2037130031
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevention of sexually transmitted HIV infection: A meta-analytic review of teh behavioral outcome literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02903934
- The paper
- Kalichman, S. C., Carey, M. P., & Johnson, B. T. (1996). Prevention of sexually transmitted HIV infection: A meta-analytic review of teh behavioral outcome literature. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02903934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.