The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Three Different LCIA Methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99: Does it matter which one you choose?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Eco-indicator 99 A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology Report
Goedkoop, M. J. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,022
Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards
Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., de Koning, A., van Oers, L. F. C. M., Sleeswijk, A. W., de Haes, U., van Duin, R., & Lindeijer, E. (2001) · Cited by 935
Environmental assessment of products
(1998) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf02978447 · Cited by 706
ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment
Ryding, S. O. (1999) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf02978514 · Cited by 689
Environmental Assessment of Products
Wenzel, H., Hauschild, M., & Alting, L. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6367-9 · Cited by 444
Self-citationde Haes, H. A. U., Jolliet, O., Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M., Krewitt, W., & Müller-Wenk, R. (1999) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf02979403 · Cited by 340
Self-citation
Cited by
Recent developments in life cycle assessment
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., & Suh, S. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 · Cited by 3,444
Self-citationRahman, A., Farrok, O., & Haque, M. M. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112279 · Cited by 1,105
Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the process industry: a review
Jacquemin, L., Pontalier, P.-Y., & Sablayrolles, C. (2012) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0432-9 · Cited by 316
Environmental sustainability assessment of bio-ethanol production in Thailand
Silalertruksa, T., & Gheewala, S. H. (2009) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.08.002 · Cited by 168
Techno-economic analysis of a glycerol biorefinery
D’Angelo, S. C., Dall’Ara, A., Mondelli, C., Pérez-Ramírez, J., & Papadokonstantakis, S. (2018) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03770 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Dreyer, L. C., Niemann, A. L., & Hauschild, M. Z.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 191-200
- ISSN
- 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7502
- OpenAlex
- W2945448384
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Three Different LCIA Methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99: Does it matter which one you choose? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02978471
- The paper
- Dreyer, L. C., Niemann, A. L., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2003). Comparison of Three Different LCIA Methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99: Does it matter which one you choose? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02978471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
