Cited by 110Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthCognitive Functions and Memory

Exercise interventions for dementia and cognitive impairment: the Seattle protocols

Open access
Teri, L., Logsdon, R.G., McCurry, S.M.·2008·The Journal of nutrition, health and aging

Abstract

Research evidence strongly suggests that increased physical exercise may not only improve physical function in older adults but may also improve mood and slow the progression of cognitive decline. This paper describes a series of evidence-based interventions grounded in social-learning and gerontological theory that were designed to increase physical activity in persons with dementia and mild cognitive impairment. These programs, part of a collective termed the Seattle Protocols, are systematic, evidence-based approaches that are unique 1) in their focus on the importance of making regular exercise a pleasant activity, and 2) in teaching both cognitively impaired participants and their caregivers behavioral and problem-solving strategies for successfully establishing and maintaining realistic and pleasant exercise goals. While additional research is needed, initial findings from randomized controlled clinical trials are quite promising and suggest that the Seattle Protocols are both feasible and beneficial for community-residing individuals with a range of cognitive abilities and impairments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02982672

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teri, L., Logsdon, R. G., & McCurry, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Teri, L.
Venue
The Journal of nutrition, health and aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
391-394
ISSN
1279-7707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050973624
Cited by
110
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The journal of nutrition health & aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG010845, R01 AG14777, U01‐AG10483, R01-AG10845, R01AG014777, U01AG010483, P50AG005136)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH072736, R01MH072736, K01 MH43266, K01MH001644, K01 MH01644)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
exercise intervention, dementia, mild cognitive impairment, Seattle protocol, physical activity, older adults, social learning theory, gerontological theory, exercise goals, problem-solving strategies, caregiver strategies, community residents, cognitive decline
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Clinical Protocols, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Exercise Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Pilot Projects, Problem Solving, Social Behavior, Washington, Geriatric Assessment, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review