Cited by 26Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

5-[123I]Iodo-A-85380: assessment of pharmacological safety, radiation dosimetry and SPECT imaging of brain nicotinic receptors in healthy human subjects

Ueda, Masashi, Iida, Yasuhiko, Mukai, Takahiro, Mamede, Marcelo, Ishizu, Koichi, Ogawa, Mikako, Magata, Yasuhiro, Konishi, Junji +1 more·2004·Annals of Nuclear Medicine

Abstract

Recently, 5-[123I]iodo-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine ([123I]5IA) was developed as a ligand for imaging the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) in human brain using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). In the present study, the toxicity and radiation absorbed dose of [123I]5IA were investigated. Behavior and physiological parameters were examined in mice and rats after administration of 5IA. There were no changes in these parameters in animals administered 1 microg/kg of 5IA or less, indicating that the no observed effect level (NOEL) of 5IA was 1 microg/kg. [123I]5IA was then administered to healthy human subjects and serial whole-body images were acquired over 24 hr. Initially, high levels of radioactivity were observed in the liver and urinary bladder and moderate levels in the lungs, kidneys, and brain. Whole brain activity at 1 hr was 4.6 +/- 0.4% of the injected dose and this value gradually decreased with time. The majority (-75%) of the radioactivity was excreted in urine within 24 hr, and less than 1% remained in all organs tested. The biological half-life of [1231]51A averaged 7.2 +/- 4.0 hr. Based on the biodistribution data, radiation absorbed doses were estimated using MIRDOSE 3.1 software with the dynamic bladder model and the ICRP gastrointestinal (GI) tract model. Consequently, the effective dose equivalent was estimated to be 30 +/- 1.4 microSv/MBq, which is an acceptable radiation burden. Having determined the safety of this compound,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02984473

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ueda, M., Iida, Y., Mukai, T., Mamede, M., Ishizu, K., Ogawa, M., Magata, Y., Konishi, J., & Saji, H.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Hamamatsu University (JP)
Corresponding author
Saji, Hideo
Venue
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2004-06
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
337-344
ISSN
  • 0914-7187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-6433
OpenAlex
W2107699817
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Nuclear Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, neuroimaging, SPECT radiotracer, radiation dosimetry, pharmacological safety, tissue distribution, effective dose, no-observed-effect level, radioligands
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Animals, Azetidines, Body Burden, Brain, Humans, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Mice, Inbred ICR, Organ Specificity, Pyridines, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Injuries, Radiometry, Radionuclide Imaging, Receptors, Nicotinic, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Species Specificity, Tissue Distribution, Whole-Body Counting, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Radiopharmaceuticals, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review