β2-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Availability During Acute and Prolonged Abstinence From Tobacco Smoking
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Available levels of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors containing the beta(2) subunit (beta(2)*-nAChR) are higher in recently abstinent tobacco smokers compared with participants who never smoked. Variations in beta(2)*-nAChR availability during the course of abstinence may be related to the urge to smoke, the extent of nicotine withdrawal, and successful abstinence. OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in beta(2)*-nAChR availability during acute and prolonged abstinence from tobacco smoking and to determine how changes in beta(2)*-nAChR availability were related to clinical features of tobacco smoking. DESIGN: Tobacco smokers participated in up to 4 iodide 123-labeled 5-iodo-A-85380 ([(123)I]5-IA) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans during abstinence at 1 day (n = 7) and 1 (n = 17), 2 (n = 7), 4 (n = 11), and 6 to 12 (n = 6) weeks. Age-matched nonsmokers participated in a single [(123)I]5-IA SPECT scan. All participants completed 1 magnetic resonance imaging study. SETTING: Academic imaging center. PARTICIPANTS: Tobacco smokers (n = 19) and an age-matched nonsmoker comparison group (n = 20). Main Outcome Measure The [(123)I]5-IA SPECT images were converted to distribution volume and were analyzed using regions of interest. RESULTS: Compared with nonsmokers, beta(2)*-nAChR availability in the striatum, cortex, and cerebellum of smokers was not different at 1 day of abstinence, was significantly higher at 1 week of abstinence, and was not different at 4 or at 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence. In smokers, beta(2)*-nAChR availability was significantly lower in the cortex and cerebellum at 6 to 12 weeks compared with 1 week of abstinence. In addition, cerebellar beta(2)*-nAChR availability at 4 weeks of abstinence was positively correlated with craving on the day of the SPECT scan. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that higher beta(2)*-nAChR availability persists up to 1 month of abstinence and normalizes to nonsmoker levels by 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence from tobacco smoking. These marked and persistent changes in beta(2)*-nAChR availability may contribute to difficulties with tobacco cessation.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In tobacco smokers, β2*-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor availability was not different from nonsmokers at 1 day of abstinence, significantly higher at 1 week, and normalized by 6–12 weeks. Higher cerebellar receptor availability at 4 weeks was positively correlated with same-day craving.
Key findings
- Compared with nonsmokers, smokers at 1 week of abstinence had significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability in striatum (+22%), cortex (+21% to +29%), and cerebellum (+24%); at 1 day, thalamic availability was significantly lower (−26%, p=.002), and at 4 weeks only occipital cortex remained significantly higher (+18%, p=.005).
- Among smoker groups, 6–12 weeks of abstinence was associated with significantly lower availability than 1 week in parietal cortex (p=.033), frontal cortex (p=.039), anterior cingulate (p=.014), occipital cortex (p=.019), and cerebellum (p=.016).
- Cerebellar β2*-nAChR availability at 4 weeks was positively correlated with craving on the day of scan: QSU-Intent rho=0.74, p=.01; QSU-Relief rho=0.74, p=.01.
- Baseline QSU-Intent correlated negatively with 1-day abstinence availability in thalamus (rho=−0.90, p=.006) and parietal cortex (rho=−0.88, p=.008); no significant correlations were found with nicotine withdrawal (MNWS).
Methods
- Nineteen tobacco smokers (9 men, 10 women; 41.1±9.0 years) and 20 age-matched nonsmokers (9 men, 11 women; 42.4±9.8 years) underwent [123I]5-IA SPECT; smokers completed up to 4 scans grouped at 1 day (n=7), 1 week (n=17), 2 weeks (n=7), 4 weeks (n=11), and 6–12 weeks (n=6) of abstinence, plus MRI for coregistration.
- [123I]5-IA was given as a bolus-to-constant-infusion ratio of 7.0 for 8 hours; regional outcome was VT/fP, analyzed with regions of interest by two raters (inter-rater variability <12%).
- Between-group comparisons used two-sample t-tests and repeated-measures mixed-effects models with group as a fixed effect and compound symmetry covariance; post hoc tests were Bonferroni-corrected at p≤0.00625, and correlations used Spearman’s rho with significance at p≤0.01.
Limitations
- The paper states that [123I]5-IA measures β2-subunit availability, primarily α4β2, but other nAChR subunits also contribute; different β2*-subunit combinations are differentially regulated, and β3 and α7 subunits were not measured. It also states there is no appropriate reference region, so nondisplaceable [123I]5-IA uptake could not be measured.
- The paper states that subjects reported mild-to-moderate nicotine withdrawal symptoms at baseline and throughout, so withdrawal-related results require replication in a larger sample with a greater range of withdrawal symptoms.
- Evident from the text: group sizes were small and unequal, especially at 1 day (n=7) and 6–12 weeks (n=6); some smokers contributed observations to more than one abstinence group; individual changes in receptor availability were highly variable (up to 48% in cortex vs less than 5% in others); and some baseline QSU data were missing, limiting correlation analyses.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
30 of 69 cited sources checked · 24 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Abstract
β2*-nAChR availability is higher in recently abstinent smokers compared to never smokers.
“β2*-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (β2*-nAChR) availability is higher in recently abstinent smokers compared to never smokers.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · boosted
“Previously, we demonstrated in vivo higher β2-subunit containing nAChR (β2*-nAChR) availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers compared to nonsmokers8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, et al. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8707–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · boosted
- Findingcitation§ Results
The difference between recently abstinent smokers and never smokers in the previous study was of greater magnitude (26-36% in cerebral cortex and 27% in striatum) than in the current study (21-29% in cerebral cortex and 22% in striatum).
“The difference between recently abstinent smokers and never smokers in the previous study8 was of a greater magnitude, e.g., 26-36% in the cerebral cortex and 27% in the striatum, than in the current study, e.g., 21-29% in the cerebral cortex and 22% in the striatum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, et al. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8707–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Premisecitation§ Results
Smokers experience craving within 2 h of their last cigarette despite continued occupancy of the receptor by nicotine.
“Smokers experience craving within 2 h of their last cigarette despite continued occupancy of the receptor by nicotine13.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, London ED, et al. Cigarette smoking saturates brain alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:907–15. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
The Results report that roughly half of presmoking craving had returned 2.5 hours after one cigarette, while estimated nicotine occupancy of α4β2* receptors remained about 90%. They do not establish that craving returned within 2 hours, as the citing sentence says (page unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Results
The β2*-subtype does not play a critical role in the physical symptoms of nicotine withdrawal.
“This is consistent with the preclinical literature suggesting that the β2*-subtype does not play a critical role in the physical symptoms of nicotine withdrawal33, 76.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Besson M, David V, Suarez S, et al. Genetic dissociation of two behaviors associated with nicotine addiction: beta-2 containing nicotinic receptors are involved in nicotine reinforcement but not in withdrawal syndrome. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;187:189–99. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0418-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [76] Jackson KJ, Martin BR, Changeux JP, Damaj MI. Differential role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits in physical and affective nicotine withdrawal signs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;325:302–12. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.132977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Premisecitation§ Conclusions
Higher β2*-nAChR availability is thought to functionally reflect higher numbers of desensitized receptors.
“Higher β2*-nAChR availability is thought to functionally reflect higher numbers of desensitized receptors13, 14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, London ED, et al. Cigarette smoking saturates brain alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:907–15. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
The Results (COMMENT; page unavailable) suggest that prolonged desensitization may cause receptor up-regulation in smokers, supporting a possible link between receptor numbers and desensitization. The paper does not establish that higher measured β2*-nAChR availability reflects a higher number of receptors currently desensitized; its direct finding concerns nicotine occupancy and associated desensitization. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [14] Picciotto MR, Addy NA, Mineur YS, Brunzell DH. It is not “either/or”: Activation and desensitization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors both contribute to behaviors related to nicotine addiction and mood. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Premisecitation§ Conclusions
A recent in vivo study in a small number of male smokers demonstrated a trend for a normalization of the β2-nAChR by 21 days of smoking cessation.
“A recent in vivo study in a small number of male smokers demonstrated a trend for a normalization of the β2-nAChR by 21 days of smoking cessation18.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Interpretationcitation§ Results
The smaller difference in the current study may be due to the older average age (approximately 5 years) of subjects, since β2*-nAChR availability decreases with age in nonsmokers.
“This may be due to the older average age (approximately 5 years) of subjects in the current study, since β2*-nAChR availability has been shown to decrease with age in nonsmokers77.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] Mitsis EM, Cosgrove KP, Staley JK, et al. Age-related decline in nicotinic receptor availability with [(123)I]5-IA-85380 SPECT. Neurobiol Aging. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Interpretationcitation§ Results
Prolonged partial occupancy of the receptor by nicotine or cotinine may contribute to the feelings of craving reported 2 h after the last cigarette and throughout the first week of abstinence.
“Dopamine release has been associated with the feeling of craving58, and both nicotine59 and cotinine60 have been shown to facilitate dopamine release, thus the prolonged partial occupancy of the receptor by nicotine or cotinine, may contribute to the feelings of craving that are reported 2 h after the last cigarette and throughout the first week of abstinence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [58] Adinoff B. Neurobiologic processes in drug reward and addiction. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2004;12:305–20. doi: 10.1080/10673220490910844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [59] Benwell ME, Balfour DJ. The effects of acute and repeated nicotine treatment on nucleus accumbens dopamine and locomotor activity. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;105:849–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb09067.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [60] Dwoskin LP, Teng L, Buxton ST, Crooks PA. (S)-(-)-Cotinine, the major brain metabolite of nicotine, stimulates nicotinic receptors to evoke [3H]dopamine release from rat striatal slices in a calcium-dependent manner. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;288:905–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Premisecitation§ Results
β2*-nAChR availability decreases with age in nonsmokers.
“since β2*-nAChR availability has been shown to decrease with age in nonsmokers77.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] Mitsis EM, Cosgrove KP, Staley JK, et al. Age-related decline in nicotinic receptor availability with [(123)I]5-IA-85380 SPECT. Neurobiol Aging. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Findingcitation§ Results
This study and previous in vivo PET and SPECT studies report no upregulation of thalamic β2*-nAChR availability during acute abstinence.
“This study and previous in vivo PET78 and SPECT8, 18 studies report no upregulation of thalamic β2*-nAChR availability during acute abstinence, which conflicts with postmortem2 and animal8, 79 studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked- cites [78] Mukhin AG, Kimes AS, Chefer SI, et al. Greater Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Density in Smokers Than in Nonsmokers: A PET Study with 2-18F-FA-85380. J Nucl Med. 2008 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.050716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [8] Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, et al. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8707–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [2] Breese C, Marks M, Logel J, et al. Effect of smoking history on [3H]nicotine binding in human postmortem brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;282:7–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [79] Pauly JR, Marks MJ, Gross SD, Collins AC. An autoradiographic analysis of cholinergic receptors in mouse brain after chronic nicotine treatment. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991;258:1127–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Premisecitation§ Results
A previous human study indicated a return to control levels within 21 days of abstinence.
“The previous human study18 indicated a return to control levels within 21 days of abstinence;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Premisecitation§ Results
In a previous study in men, β2*-nAChR availability decreased to nonsmoker levels in some subjects by 21 days of abstinence.
“In the previous study in men, β2*-nAChR availability decreased to nonsmoker levels in some subjects by 21 days of abstinence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Results
The high heterogeneity of the subject population in the current study compared to the previous study in men only likely accounts for the high individual variability with regard to receptor changes during prolonged abstinence.
“The high heterogeneity of the subject population in the current study compared to the previous study in men only18 likely accounts for the high individual variability with regard to receptor changes during prolonged abstinence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Findingown data§ Results
In 1-day abstinent smokers compared to nonsmokers, β2*-nAChR availability (VT/fP) was significantly reduced in the thalamus.
“In 1 day abstinent smokers as compared to nonsmokers, VT/fP was significantly reduced in the thalamus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
There were no significant correlations between baseline smoking variables (FTND, years smoked, cigarettes per day) and β2*-nAChR availability at any time point.
“There were no significant correlations between baseline smoking variables, e.g., FTND, number of years smoked, or number of cigarettes smoked per day with β2*-nAChR availability at any time point (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
There was variability between smokers who participated in multiple scans in changes in β2*-nAChR availability over time, with some showing dramatic changes (up to 48% in cortex) and others showing barely any difference (less than 5%).
“There was also variability between smokers who participated in multiple scans in changes in β2*-nAChR availability over time with some abstinent smokers showing dramatic changes in β2*-nAChR availability (up to 48% change in the cortex) and others showing barely any difference, e.g., less than 5%, over time (individual data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
In 4-week abstinent smokers compared to nonsmokers, β2*-nAChR availability (VT/fP) was significantly higher in the occipital cortex.
“In 4 week abstinent smokers as compared to nonsmokers, VT/fP was significantly higher in the occipital cortex (Table 3 and Figures 1 and 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Compared to 1-week abstinent smokers, 1-day abstinent smokers had significantly lower VT/fP in the thalamus and cerebellum.
“Compared to 1 week abstinent smokers, 1 day abstinent smokers had significantly lower VT/fP in the thalamus (t[25]=-3.51, corrected p=0.007) and cerebellum (t[25]=-3.02, corrected p=0.023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Baseline QSU-Intent scores correlated negatively with β2*-nAChR availability at 1 day of abstinence in the thalamus and parietal cortex.
“Specifically, baseline QSU-Intent scores correlated negatively with β2*-nAChR availability at 1 day of abstinence in the thalamus (rho=-0.90, p=0.006) and parietal cortex (rho=-0.88, p=0.008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
QSU-Intent and QSU-Relief were significantly higher on the day of scan in the 1-day abstinent smoker group compared to smokers at other time points.
“Specifically, overall group differences in QSU-Intent and QSU-Relief were attributable to significantly higher levels of each of these measures on the day of the scan in the 1 day abstinent smoker group as compared to smokers at other time points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Among abstinent smoker groups, there were significant between-group differences in VT/fP in the thalamus, parietal cortex, frontal cortex, anterior cingulate, occipital cortex, and cerebellum.
“Among the abstinent smoker groups, there were significant between group differences in VT/fP in the thalamus (F[4,25]=4.12, p=0.011), parietal cortex (F[4,25]=2.95, p=0.040), frontal cortex (F[4,25]=2.88, p=0.043), anterior cingulate (F[4,25]=3.75, p=0.016), occipital cortex (F[4,25]=3.42, p=0.023), and cerebellum (F[[4,25]=4.00, p=0.012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Compared to 1-week abstinent smokers, 6-12 week abstinent smokers had significantly lower VT/fP in the parietal cortex, frontal cortex, anterior cingulate, occipital cortex, and cerebellum.
“Compared to 1 week abstinent smokers, 6-12 week abstinent smokers had significantly lower VT/fP in the parietal cortex (t[25]=-2.87, corrected p=0.033), frontal cortex (t[25]=-2.80, corrected p=0.039), anterior cingulate (t[25]=-3.21, corrected p=0.014), occipital cortex (t[25]=-3.10, corrected p=0.019) and cerebellum (t[25]=-3.17, corrected p=0.016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Cerebellar β2*-nAChR availability at 4 weeks of abstinence was positively correlated with craving on both QSU-Intent and QSU-Relief.
“Specifically, a positive correlation was observed between cerebellar β2*-nAChR availability and craving on both the QSU-Intent (rho=0.74, p=0.01) and QSU-Relief (rho=0.74, p=0.01) at 4 weeks of abstinence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
There were no significant differences in VT/fP between 1-week abstinent smokers and smokers at 2 or 4 weeks of abstinence.
“There were no significant differences in VT/fP between 1 week abstinent smokers compared to smokers at 2 or 4 weeks of abstinence (Table 3 and Figures 1 and 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
In 1-week abstinent smokers compared to nonsmokers, β2*-nAChR availability (VT/fP) was significantly higher in the striatum, cerebellum, and throughout the cortex.
“In 1 week abstinent smokers as compared to nonsmokers, VT/fP was significantly higher in the striatum, cerebellum and throughout the cortex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Subjects reported a mild-moderate level of nicotine withdrawal symptoms at baseline and over the course of the study.
“In this study, subjects reported a mild-moderate level of nicotine withdrawal symptoms at baseline and over the course of the study”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
There is a positive correlation between craving on the day of scan at 4 weeks of abstinence and cerebellar β2*-nAChR availability at 4 weeks of abstinence.
“We also report a positive correlation between craving on the day of scan at 4 weeks of abstinence and cerebellar β2*-nAChR availability at 4 weeks of abstinence.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Thus, those individuals with higher cerebellar β2*-nAChR availability at 4 weeks of abstinence report a greater urge to smoke on that day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data§ Results
There are no significant correlations between nicotine withdrawal and β2*-nAChR availability.
“We report no significant correlations between nicotine withdrawal and β2*-nAChR availability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
There were no significant correlations between β2*-nAChR availability at 1 week of abstinence and clinical features.
“Additionally, we did not obtain significant correlations between β2*-nAChR availability at 1 week of abstinence and clinical features.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
The current study did not find a significant decrease, on average, in β2*-nAChR availability by 4 weeks of abstinence compared to 1 week of abstinence.
“Also, while the current study did not find a significant decrease, on average, in β2*-nAChR availability by 4 weeks of abstinence compared to 1 week of abstinence, in some subjects normalization did occur by this point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
In some subjects, normalization of β2*-nAChR availability occurred by 4 weeks of abstinence.
“Also, while the current study did not find a significant decrease, on average, in β2*-nAChR availability by 4 weeks of abstinence compared to 1 week of abstinence, in some subjects normalization did occur by this point.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Two smokers in the current study exhibited increased β2*-nAChR availability in the thalamus compared to nonsmokers.
“However, two smokers in the current study exhibited increased β2*-nAChR availability in the thalamus compared to nonsmokers, highlighting the role of individual differences in receptor regulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions
These marked and persistent changes in β2*-nAChR availability may contribute to difficulties with tobacco cessation.
“These marked and persistent changes in β2*-nAChR availability may contribute to difficulties with tobacco cessation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Conclusions
Preclinical studies have demonstrated that nAChR levels return to control levels after termination of nicotine exposure, but with great variability in the time course.
“Preclinical studies have demonstrated that nAChR levels return to control levels after termination of nicotine exposure, but with great variability in the time course15-17.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] Pietila K, Lahde T, Attila M, Ahtee L, Nordberg A. Regulation of nicotinic receptors in the brain of mice withdrawn from chronic oral nicotine treatment. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol. 1998;357:176–182. doi: 10.1007/pl00005152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [16] Collins A, Romm E, Wehner J. Dissociation of the apparent relationship between nicotine tolerance and up-regulation of nicotinic receptors. Brain Research Bulletin. 1990;25:373–379. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(90)90222-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [17] Koylu E, Demirgoren S, London E, Pogun S. Sex difference in up-regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat brain. Life Sci. 1997;61:PL 185–PL190. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(97)00665-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Results
At 1 day of abstinence, residual nicotine or a pharmacologically active metabolite (e.g., cotinine or nornicotine) is present in the brain and interferes with radiotracer binding, leading to the appearance of lower β2*-nAChR availability.
“First, at 1 day of abstinence there is still residual nicotine, or a pharmacologically active metabolite of nicotine, such as cotinine or nornicotine present in the brain that interferes with radiotracer binding, thus leading to the appearance of lower β2*-nAChR availability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Results
Craving has a motor component.
“Our finding of a link between the cerebellum and craving further suggests that craving has a motor component”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning§ Methods
The outcome measure VT/fP was used to correct for possible differences in radiotracer metabolism or plasma protein binding between groups and subjects.
“The outcome measure VT/fP (regional activity divided by free plasma parent between 6 and 8 hours), was used to correct for possible differences in radiotracer metabolism or plasma protein binding between groups and subjects.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“By using the outcome measure VT/fP, we correct for individual differences in radiotracer metabolism and protein binding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Premisecitation§ Results
Dopamine release has been associated with the feeling of craving.
“Dopamine release has been associated with the feeling of craving58”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Adinoff B. Neurobiologic processes in drug reward and addiction. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2004;12:305–20. doi: 10.1080/10673220490910844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Premisecitation§ Conclusions
A postmortem human study indicated that individuals who had quit smoking at least 2 months prior to their death had nicotine binding levels similar to control nonsmokers.
“A postmortem human study indicated that individuals who had quit smoking at least 2 months prior to their death (range 2 months-30 years) had nicotine binding levels similar to control nonsmokers2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Breese C, Marks M, Logel J, et al. Effect of smoking history on [3H]nicotine binding in human postmortem brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;282:7–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Premisecitation§ Conclusions
β2*-nAChRs are a critical neural substrate mediating the effects of nicotine in brain.
“In recent years evidence has emerged that the β2*-nAChRs are a critical neural substrate mediating the effects of nicotine in brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [22] Picciotto M, Zoli M, Rimondin R, et al. Acetycholine receptors containing the beta2 subunit are involved in the reinforcing properties of nicotine. Nature. 1998;391:173–177. doi: 10.1038/34413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [23] Walters C, Brown S, Changeux JP, Martin B, Damaj M. The β2 but not the α7 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is required for nicotine-conditioned place preference in mice. Psychopharmacol. 2006;184:339–344. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0295-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [24] Shoaib M, Gommans J, Morley A, Stolerman I, Grailhe R, Changeux J. The role of nicotinic receptor beta-2 subunits in nicotine discrimination and conditioned taste aversion. Neuropharmacology. 2002;42:530–539. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(01)00194-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Results
The cerebellum is a brain region critically linked to craving by both motor and cognitive functions.
“Taken together, these studies and the present findings highlight the cerebellum as a brain region that is critically linked to craving by both motor and cognitive functions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Results
Taken together, the results consistently highlight a return to control levels or "normalization" of the β2*-nAChR after termination of chronic nicotine.
“but taken together the results consistently highlight a return to control levels or “normalization” of the β2*-nAChR after termination of chronic nicotine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Results
The normalization of upregulated β2*-nAChRs in tobacco smokers during smoking cessation is prolonged.
“Specifically, we demonstrate that the normalization of upregulated β2*-nAChRs in tobacco smokers during smoking cessation is prolonged.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Results
Prolonged normalization of the receptor is in line with the protracted withdrawal symptoms reported by tobacco smokers.
“Additionally, this prolonged normalization of the receptor is in line with the protracted withdrawal symptoms reported by tobacco smokers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Results
Previous preclinical studies demonstrated that in chronically nicotine treated animals, nAChR levels returned to levels observed in control animals after termination of nicotine, but with variable timing ranging between 1 and 3 weeks.
“Previous preclinical studies demonstrated that in chronically nicotine treated animals, nAChR levels returned to levels observed in control animals after termination of nicotine, but with variable timing ranging between 1 and 3 weeks15, 80, 81.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] Pietila K, Lahde T, Attila M, Ahtee L, Nordberg A. Regulation of nicotinic receptors in the brain of mice withdrawn from chronic oral nicotine treatment. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol. 1998;357:176–182. doi: 10.1007/pl00005152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [80] Marks M, Stitzel J, Collins A. Time course study of the effects of chronic nicotine infusion on drug response and brain receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Therap. 1985;235:619–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [81] Ksir C, Hakan R, Hall D, Kellar K. Exposure to nicotine enhances the behavioral stimulant effect of nicotine and increases binding of [3H]-acetylcholine to nicotinic receptors. Psychopharmacology. 1985;24:527. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(85)90058-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- Interpretationown data§ Results
Individual differences play a role in receptor regulation.
“highlighting the role of individual differences in receptor regulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 32
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionsSmoking one cigarette led to greater than 88% receptor occupancy, suggesting that smokers maintain saturation of β2*-nAChRs over the day.
“Additionally, smoking one cigarette led to greater than 88% receptor occupancy13 suggesting that smokers maintain saturation of β2*-nAChRs over the day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, London ED, et al. Cigarette smoking saturates brain alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:907–15. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ResultsBoth nicotine and cotinine have been shown to facilitate dopamine release.
“both nicotine59 and cotinine60 have been shown to facilitate dopamine release”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [59] Benwell ME, Balfour DJ. The effects of acute and repeated nicotine treatment on nucleus accumbens dopamine and locomotor activity. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;105:849–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb09067.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [60] Dwoskin LP, Teng L, Buxton ST, Crooks PA. (S)-(-)-Cotinine, the major brain metabolite of nicotine, stimulates nicotinic receptors to evoke [3H]dopamine release from rat striatal slices in a calcium-dependent manner. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;288:905–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionsHigher β2*-nAChR availability in smokers may be due to increased assembly of α4 and β2 subunits in endoplasmic reticulum, increased transport of receptors to membrane, decreased receptor turnover, and/or presence of nicotine promoting intracellular maturation of α4β2-nAChR to high-affinity conformation.
“Higher β2*-nAChR availability in smokers may be due to a variety of molecular changes including increased assembly of α4 and β2 subunits in the endoplasmic reticulum9, increased transport of receptors to the membrane10, decreased receptor turnover11, and/or the presence of nicotine promoting intracellular maturation of the α4β2-nAChR to a high-affinity conformation12.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] Nashmi R, Dickinson ME, McKinney S, et al. Assembly of alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors assessed with functional fluorescently labeled subunits: effects of localization, trafficking, and nicotine-induced upregulation in clonal mammalian cells and in cultured midbrain neurons. J Neurosci. 2003;23:11554–67. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-37-11554.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [10] Harkness PC, Millar NS. Changes in conformation and subcellular distribution of alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors revealed by chronic nicotine treatment and expression of subunit chimeras. J Neurosci. 2002;22:10172–81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-23-10172.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [11] Peng X, Gerzanich V, Anand R, Whiting P, Lindstrom J. Nicotine-induced increase in neuronal nicotinic receptor results from a decrease in the rate of receptor turnover. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;46:523–530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsSmokers at one week of abstinence have significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability in the cortex, striatum and cerebellum, but not thalamus, compared to nonsmokers.
“Consistent with our previous study8 we report significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability in smokers at one week of abstinence in the cortex, striatum and cerebellum, but not thalamus compared to nonsmokers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, et al. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8707–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ ResultsA previous study found a negative correlation between the urge to smoke to relieve withdrawal symptoms and β2*-nAChR availability in the sensorimotor cortex at approximately 1 week of abstinence.
“We previously found a negative correlation between the urge to smoke to relieve withdrawal symptoms and β2*-nAChR availability in the sensorimotor cortex at approximately 1 week of abstinence8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, et al. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8707–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Conclusions[123I]5-IA is a nicotinic agonist that binds with high affinity to the nicotine binding site on nAChRs that contain the β2-subunit.
“[123I]5-IA is a nicotinic agonist that binds with high affinity to the nicotine binding site on nAChR that contain the β2-subunit39.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Mukhin A, Gundisch D, Horti A, et al. 5-Iodo-A-85380, an α4β2 subtype-selective ligand for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 2000;57:642–649. doi: 10.1124/mol.57.3.642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
The available indexed passages are BindingDB ligand listings (no section or page given), not passages describing the paper’s receptor-binding or functional findings. Searches for 5-iodo-A-85380 agonism, β2-containing receptors, and the nicotine binding site found no passage that establishes the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ ResultsThe previous study had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability in all regions at 4 hr of abstinence compared to nonsmokers, while the current study reports lower thalamic but similar β2*-nAChR availability in the striatum, cerebellum and throughout the cortex compared to the nonsmoker group at 1 day of abstinence.
“One difference is that the previous study18 had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability in all regions at 4 hr of abstinence compared to the nonsmokers, while the current study reports lower thalamic but similar β2*-nAChR availability in the striatum, cerebellum and throughout the cortex compared to the nonsmoker group at 1 day of abstinence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ ResultsOur data extend the findings of previous studies which showed that the upregulation of the β2*-nAChR in recently abstinent tobacco smokers was temporary and could be measured with [123I]5-IA SPECT imaging.
“In summary, our data extend the findings of previous studies8, 18 which showed that the upregulation of the β2*-nAChR in recently abstinent tobacco smokers was temporary and could be measured with [123I]5-IA SPECT imaging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, et al. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8707–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
The Results report higher β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent smokers than in nonsmokers, measured with [123I]5-IA SPECT. The study does not establish that this upregulation was temporary in human smokers; it imaged them during early abstinence rather than following receptor levels over time. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ ResultsA previous study reported significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability at 21 days of abstinence compared to 10 days of abstinence.
“Additionally, they reported significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability at 21 days of abstinence compared to 10 days of abstinence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ResultsDifferent β2*-subunit combinations appear to be differentially regulated by nicotine, with α3/α6 and α6α4β2* and α5α4β2* not upregulating or decreasing in response to nicotine while α6β2 (nonα4) nAChR increase in response to nicotine.
“Importantly, different β2*-subunit combinations appear to be differentially regulated by nicotine, with α3/α6 and α6α4β2* and α5α4β2* not upregulating or decreasing in response to nicotine38, 85-88 while α6β2 (nonα4) nAChR increase in response to nicotine88.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 5 sources checked- cites [38] Mao D, Perry DC, Yasuda RP, Wolfe BB, Kellar KJ. The alpha4beta2alpha5 nicotinic cholinergic receptor in rat brain is resistant to up-regulation by nicotine in vivo. J Neurochem. 2008;104:446–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [85] Lai A, Parameswaran N, Khwaja M, et al. Long-term nicotine treatment decreases striatal alpha 6* nicotinic acetylcholine receptor sites and function in mice. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67:1639–47. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.006429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [86] McCallum SE, Parameswaran N, Bordia T, Fan H, McIntosh JM, Quik M. Differential regulation of mesolimbic alpha 3/alpha 6 beta 2 and alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor sites and function after long-term oral nicotine to monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;318:381–8. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.104414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [87] McCallum SE, Parameswaran N, Bordia T, et al. Increases in alpha4* but not alpha3*/alpha6* nicotinic receptor sites and function in the primate striatum following chronic oral nicotine treatment. J Neurochem. 2006;96:1028–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [88] Perez XA, Bordia T, McIntosh JM, Grady SR, Quik M. Long-term nicotine treatment differentially regulates striatal alpha6alpha4beta2* and alpha6(Nonalpha4)beta2* nAChR expression and function. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;74:844–53. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.048843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
The Introduction and Discussion report that chronic nicotine decreased striatal α6α4β2* receptors and increased α6(nonα4)β2* receptors in rodents. The Introduction also reports no change in α4α5β2 receptors, but the passages found do not address the claimed α3/α6 combination. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ ResultsHigher β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers compared to nonsmokers is temporary.
“This study is also consistent with a previous study18 demonstrating that higher β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers compared to nonsmokers is temporary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ResultsCompared to nonsmokers, smokers had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability at 4 hr of abstinence, significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability at 10 days of abstinence, and similar β2*-nAChR availability at 21 days of abstinence.
“Specifically, compared to nonsmokers, smokers had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability at 4 hr of abstinence, significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability at 10 days of abstinence, and similar β2*-nAChR availability at 21 days of abstinence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsThere were no differences in total parent or fP between groups at other time points, or in free parent between groups at any time point.
“There were no differences in total parent (kBq/mL) or fP between groups at other time points, or between groups at any time point in free parent (kBq/mL).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsThere were significant differences in QSU-Intent and QSU-Relief, but not MNWS, between groups of abstinent smokers.
“There were significant differences in QSU-Intent (F[4,25]=7.41, p<0.015) and QSU Relief (F[4,25]=5.63, p=0.002), but not in MNWS scores (F[4,25]=0.33, p=0.857), between groups of abstinent smokers (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsThere were significant differences in total parent between nonsmokers and 1-day abstinent smokers, and in fP between nonsmokers and 2-week abstinent smokers.
“There were significant differences in total parent (kBq/mL) between nonsmokers and 1 day abstinent smokers and in fP between nonsmokers and 2 week abstinent smokers (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsThe current study indicates that on average, β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers does not normalize until between 4-12 weeks, although this is highly variable between individuals.
“and, the current study indicates that on average, β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers does not normalize until between 4-12 weeks, although, this is highly variable between individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ ResultsSmokers who participated in scans at different times since last cigarette were equivalent in age, level of nicotine dependence (FTND), cigarettes per day, and years of smoking.
“Smokers who participated in scans at different times since the last cigarette were equivalent in age, level of nicotine dependence (as assessed by the FTND at intake), cigarettes smoked per day, and years of smoking (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ ResultsPlasma cotinine and nicotine levels and carbon monoxide measurements were negligible in nonsmokers and in smokers were highest at 1 day of abstinence and decreased over time, confirming abstinence from smoking.
“Plasma cotinine and nicotine levels and carbon monoxide measurements were negligible in nonsmokers and in smokers were highest at 1 day of abstinence and decreased over time, confirming abstinence from smoking (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionsImaging with [123I]5-IA SPECT in nonhuman primate and human subjects results in a binding pattern consistent with the established regional distribution of β2-nAChR and is highest in the thalamus and intermediate throughout the cortex and cerebellum.
“Imaging with [123I]5-IA SPECT in nonhuman primate and human subjects results in a binding pattern that is consistent with the established regional distribution of β2-nAChR and is highest in the thalamus and intermediate throughout the cortex and cerebellum43, 44.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [43] Staley JK, van Dyck CH, Weinzimmer D, et al. 123I-5-IA-85380 SPECT measurement of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in human brain by the constant infusion paradigm: feasibility and reproducibility. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1466–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [44] Chefer S, Horti A, Lee K, et al. In vivo imaging of brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with 5-[123I]iodo-A-85830 using single photon emission computed tomography. Life Sci. 1998;63:355–360. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(98)00514-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ ConclusionsHigher β2*-nAChR availability persists up to 1 month of abstinence, and normalizes to nonsmoker levels by 6-12 weeks of abstinence from tobacco smoking.
“These data suggest higher β2*-nAChR availability persists up to 1 month of abstinence, and normalizes to nonsmoker levels by 6-12 weeks of abstinence from tobacco smoking.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Second, the normalization of the β2*-nAChR is prolonged, requiring up to 6-12 weeks of abstinence to fully return to nonsmoker levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Results · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsSubjects who reported high baseline craving likely smoked more cigarettes immediately prior to their quit day and had lower receptor availability at 1 day of abstinence.
“Thus, we believe that subjects who reported high baseline craving, likely smoked more cigarettes immediately prior to their quit day and had lower receptor availability at 1 day of abstinence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Conclusions[123I]5-IA demonstrates low nonspecific binding, acceptable dosimetry in human subjects, high brain uptake, and good test-retest reproducibility.
“This ligand demonstrates low nonspecific binding40 and has acceptable dosimetry in human subjects with high brain uptake41, 42 and good test-retest reproducibility43.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [40] Horti A, Koren A, Lee K, et al. Radiosynthesis and preliminary evaluation of 5-[123/125I]iodo-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine: a radioligand for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nucl Med Biol. 1999;26:175–182. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(98)00086-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [41] Fujita M, Seibyl JP, Vaupel DB, et al. Whole-body biodistribution, radiation absorbed dose, and brain SPET imaging with [123i]5-i-A-85380 in healthy human subjects. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:183–90. doi: 10.1007/s00259-001-0695-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [42] Ueda M, Iida Y, Mukai T, et al. 5-[123I]Iodo-A-85380: assessment of pharmacological safety, radiation dosimetry and SPECT imaging of brain nicotinic receptors in healthy human subjects. Annals of Nuclear Medicine. 2004;18:337–344. doi: 10.1007/BF02984473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ MethodsTwo raters conducted the image analysis, and variability between raters was <12% across regions of interest; the mean of the two raters is reported.
“Two raters conducted the analysis. Variability between raters was <12 % across regions-of-interest. The mean of the analysis from the two raters is reported.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Results[123I]5-IA is metabolized in the liver by enzymes in the cytochrome P450 family, such as CYP2A6, CYP2B6, and CYP2D6.
“Consistently, we expect that [123I]5-IA is metabolized in the liver by enzymes in the cytochrome P450 family, such as CYP2A6, which acts on nicotine, and CYP2B6 and CYP2D6, which catalyze the dealkylation of aromatic ethers56, 57.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [56] Baldwin RM, Zoghbi SS, Staley JK, et al. Chemical fate of the nicotinic acetylcholinergic radiotracer [123I]5-IA-85380 in baboon brain and plasma. Nucl Med Biol. 2006;33:549–54. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [57] Lewis DF. Human cytochromes P450 associated with the phase 1 metabolism of drugs and other xenobiotics: a compilation of substrates and inhibitors of the CYP1, CYP2 and CYP3 families. Curr Med Chem. 2003;10:1955–72. doi: 10.2174/0929867033456855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ MethodsNonsmoking status was confirmed by plasma cotinine levels <15 ng/mL, urine cotinine levels <100 ng/mL, and carbon monoxide levels <11 ppm on the day of intake and day of scan.
“Nonsmoking status, was confirmed by plasma cotinine levels <15 ng/mL, urine cotinine levels <100 ng/mL and carbon monoxide levels <11 ppm on the day of intake and day of scan.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ ResultsThere were no differences between groups in injected dose, bolus to infusion ratio, or time of scan.
“There were no differences between groups in injected dose, bolus to infusion ratio, or time of scan (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsThe physical action of smoking a cigarette is likely to be critically tied to craving during abstinence.
“Thus, the physical action of smoking a cigarette is likely to be critically tied to craving during abstinence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsCraving for cigarettes may elicit preparation for action or voluntary movement, goal directed actions (e.g., lighting a cigarette, bringing a cigarette up to the mouth) and/or motor imagery which are linked to the motor system.
“so that craving for cigarettes may elicit preparation for action or voluntary movement, goal directed actions (e.g., lighting a cigarette, bringing a cigarette up to the mouth) and/or motor imagery which are linked to the motor system66, 67.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [66] Porro CA, Francescato MP, Cettolo V, et al. Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 1996;16:7688–98. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-23-07688.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [67] Cunnington R, Windischberger C, Deecke L, Moser E. The preparation and readiness for voluntary movement: a high-field event-related fMRI study of the Bereitschafts-BOLD response. Neuroimage. 2003;20:404–12. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00291-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionsNicotine-induced increases in nAChR (upregulation) are conferred by a specific microdomain in the β2-subunit and are confined to nAChRs that contain the β2-subunit.
“Importantly, nicotine induced increases in nAChR, termed “upregulation”, are conferred by a specific microdomain that is in the β2-subunit 34 and thus this upregulation is confined to nAChR that contain the β2-subunit4, 19, 31, 35-38.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [34] Sallette J, Bohler S, Benoit P, et al. An extracellular protein microdomain controls upregulation of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by nicotine. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:18767–18775. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308260200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [4] Nguyen HN, Rasmussen BA, Perry DC. Subtype-selective up-regulation by chronic nicotine of high-affinity nicotinic receptors in rat brain demonstrated by receptor autoradiography. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;307:1090–7. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.056408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [19] Flores C, Rogers S, Pabreza L, Wolfe B, Kellar K. A subtype of nicotinic cholinergic receptor in rat brain is composed of alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits and is up-regulated by chronic nicotine treatment. Mol Pharmacol. 1992;41:31–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown data§ MethodsSubjects were given structured interviews using SCID to rule out any Axis I Disorder except Nicotine Dependence.
“Subjects were given structured interviews using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID) to rule out any Axis I Disorder except for Nicotine Dependence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsThe discrepancy between previous and current correlations may be due to differences in correlational analysis methods, such as voxel-based analyses in the previous study versus Spearman's rho correlations with regions-of-interest in the current study.
“This discrepancy may be due to differences in correlational analysis methods, e.g., voxel-based analyses in the previous study versus spearman's rho correlations with regions-of-interest in the current study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Voxel-based analyses may be more sensitive to detecting significance in smaller brain regions.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitation§ MethodsThere is no appropriate reference region for [123I]5-IA, so nondisplaceable uptake could not be measured.
“As described previously43, there is no appropriate reference region for this radiotracer, so nondisplaceable [123I]5-IA uptake could not be measured.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Staley JK, van Dyck CH, Weinzimmer D, et al. 123I-5-IA-85380 SPECT measurement of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in human brain by the constant infusion paradigm: feasibility and reproducibility. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1466–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone given§ MethodsSmoking status was confirmed by plasma cotinine levels >150 ng/mL, urine cotinine levels >100 ng/mL, and carbon monoxide levels >11 on the day of intake.
“Smoking status was confirmed by plasma cotinine levels >150 ng/mL, urine cotinine levels >100 ng/mL and carbon monoxide levels >11 on the day of intake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ MethodsVT/fP is proportional to binding potential, which is proportional to receptor number at equilibrium, given no change in affinity and no difference in nondisplaceable uptake between subjects or comparison groups.
“VT/fP is proportional to the binding potential (BP, mL/g=Bmax/KD), which is proportional to the receptor number (Bmax) at equilibrium, given the assumptions that there is no change in affinity (KD) and that nondisplaceable (nonspecific and free) uptake does not differ between subjects or comparison groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Innis RB, Cunningham VJ, Delforge J, et al. Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1533–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no change in affinity (KD) of [123I]5-IA for β2*-nAChR.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Nondisplaceable (nonspecific and free) uptake of [123I]5-IA does not differ between subjects or comparison groups.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ MethodsA 57Co-distributed source was measured with each experiment to control for day-to-day variation in camera sensitivity.
“A 57Co-distributed source was measured with each experiment to control for day-to-day variation in camera sensitivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoning§ ResultsIn radiotracer imaging studies it is imperative that brain uptake is corrected for radiotracer metabolism, since differences in metabolism determine how much radiotracer is available to the brain.
“In radiotracer imaging studies it is imperative that brain uptake is corrected for radiotracer metabolism, since differences in metabolism of the radiotracer determine how much radiotracer is available to the brain, e.g., fast metabolizers will have less radiotracer available to brain, while slow metabolizers will have more radiotracer available to brain for a given dose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsNicotine or another chemical in tobacco smoke may have changed the metabolism of the radiotracer, resulting in lower total parent at 1 day of abstinence.
“This highlights the impact of nicotine or another chemical in tobacco smoke on metabolism, e.g., because nicotine was still present, it may have changed the metabolism of the radiotracer, resulting in lower total parent at 1 day of abstinence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoning§ MethodsUse of mixed-effects regression models accounted for observations between abstinent smoker groups that were not entirely independent.
“These between group differences were evaluated using repeated measures, mixed-effects models in order to account for the observations between abstinent smoker groups that were not entirely independent, given that some abstinent smokers contribute observations to more than one group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsThis is consistent with the clinical course of tobacco smoking in which craving, withdrawal symptoms, and risk for relapse are prolonged.
“This is consistent with the clinical course of tobacco smoking in which craving, withdrawal symptoms, and risk for relapse are prolonged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsDifferences in time course changes may be due to differences in dosing regimen, chronicity of nicotine, route of administration, metabolism between species, specificity of the radioligand, or sex and/or genetic differences in nAChR subunit expression and composition of nicotinic agonist binding sites.
“The differences in the time course changes may be due to differences in dosing regimen, chronicity of nicotine, route of administration, metabolism between species, specificity of the radioligand, or sex and/or genetic differences in nAChR subunit expression and composition of nicotinic agonist binding sites”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsnAChR subunit expression varies regionally, and differential regulation of these distinct subunit combinations that are measured by a single nicotinic agonist ligand such as [123I]5-IA will result in regional differences in the degree of upregulation in smokers and the degree of receptor normalization during abstinence.
“Notably, nAChR subunit expression varies regionally, and differential regulation of these distinct subunit combinations that are measured by a single nicotinic agonist ligand such as [123I]5-IA will result in regional differences in the degree of upregulation in smokers and the degree of receptor normalization during abstinence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ Results[123I]5-IA measures the availability of the β2-subunit of the nAChR, primarily the α4β2-subunit, but other subunits also contribute to the regulation of the nAChR by tobacco smoking.
“One limitation of this study is that [123I]5-IA measures the availability of the β2-subunit of the nAChR, primarily the α4β2-subunit, but other subunits also contribute to the regulation of the nAChR by tobacco smoking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsThe difference at 4 hr versus 24 hours is likely due to high levels of residual nicotine or metabolites present in the brain at 4 hr of abstinence, resulting in lower β2*-nAChR availability.
“This is interesting and likely due to high levels of residual nicotine or metabolites present in the brain at 4 hr of abstinence (versus ∼24 hours in the current study) resulting in lower β2*-nAChR availability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsThe preclinical studies support a process of prolonged normalization when we consider that 1-3 weeks is substantial in the life span of a rodent.
“The preclinical studies support a process of prolonged normalization when we consider that 1-3 weeks is substantial in the life span of a rodent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsWe are likely measuring the β2-subunit in combination with α3-6 subunits, leaving the in vivo measurement of the β3-subunit and α7-subunit for the future.
“Thus, we are likely measuring the β2-subunit in combination with α3-6 subunits leaving the in vivo measurement of the β3-subunit and α7-subunit for the future, with further radiotracer development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ResultsThe β2-subunit has been linked primarily to the reinforcing effects of nicotine and combines with the α3-6 subunits.
“Notably, the β2-subunit has been linked primarily to the reinforcing effects of nicotine22, 83, 84 and combines with the α3-6 subunits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [22] Picciotto M, Zoli M, Rimondin R, et al. Acetycholine receptors containing the beta2 subunit are involved in the reinforcing properties of nicotine. Nature. 1998;391:173–177. doi: 10.1038/34413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [83] Walters CL, Brown S, Changeux JP, Martin B, Damaj MI. The beta2 but not alpha7 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is required for nicotine-conditioned place preference in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;184:339–44. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0295-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
- cites [84] Brunzell DH, Chang JR, Schneider B, Olausson P, Taylor JR, Picciotto MR. beta2-Subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are involved in nicotine-induced increases in conditioned reinforcement but not progressive ratio responding for food in C57BL/6 mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;184:328–38. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0099-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ResultsThe conflict between human and postmortem/animal studies may be due to differences in methodology or the higher relative dose of nicotine in the postmortem and animal studies.
“In general, this may be due to differences in methodology or the higher relative dose of nicotine in the postmortem and animal studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
There is no change in affinity (KD) of [123I]5-IA for β2*-nAChR.
“given the assumptions that there is no change in affinity (KD)”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Nondisplaceable (nonspecific and free) uptake of [123I]5-IA does not differ between subjects or comparison groups.
“and that nondisplaceable (nonspecific and free) uptake does not differ between subjects or comparison groups.”
The paper relies on this without support.
[123I]5-IA administered at a “trace” dose (<1% occupancy) does not interfere with receptor and cell function.
“Because [123I]5-IA is administered at a “trace” dose (<1% occupancy) for SPECT imaging it does not interfere with receptor and cell function.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Voxel-based analyses may be more sensitive to detecting significance in smaller brain regions.
“Voxel-based analyses may be more sensitive to detecting significance in smaller brain regions, but that was beyond the scope of the current study.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies in humans have suggested a functional role of these receptors in relapse vulnerability.
“A hallmark of chronic nicotine administration is the upregulation of nicotinic receptors in the brain (Marks et al, 1983; Schwartz and Kellar, 1983) and recent studies in humans have suggested a functional role of these receptors in relapse vulnerability (Cosgrove et al, 2009).”
From Divergent Functional Effects of Sazetidine-A and Varenicline During Nicotine Withdrawal (2013) · cites this paper as Cosgrove et al, 2009
Nicotinic receptor availability is directly related to increased relapse rate.
“a recent SPECT study has suggested that nicotinic receptor availability is directly related to increased relapse rate (Cosgrove et al, 2009).”
From Divergent Functional Effects of Sazetidine-A and Varenicline During Nicotine Withdrawal (2013) · cites this paper as Cosgrove et al, 2009
Abstinent smokers have higher β2* nAChR levels than nonsmokers, and these levels return to baseline within 3-12 weeks.
“Abstinent smokers compared to nonsmokers had higher levels of β2* nAChRs, which returned to baseline between 3-12 weeks, and elevated nAChR levels correlated with urge to smoke (Cosgrove et al., 2009; Mamede et al., 2007; Staley et al., 2006).”
From The duration of nicotine withdrawal-associated deficits in contextual fear conditioning parallels changes in hippocampal high affinity nicotinic acetylcholine receptor upregulation (2012) · cites this paper as Cosgrove et al., 2009
Elevated nAChR levels in abstinent smokers correlate with urge to smoke.
“Abstinent smokers compared to nonsmokers had higher levels of β2* nAChRs, which returned to baseline between 3-12 weeks, and elevated nAChR levels correlated with urge to smoke (Cosgrove et al., 2009; Mamede et al., 2007; Staley et al., 2006).”
From The duration of nicotine withdrawal-associated deficits in contextual fear conditioning parallels changes in hippocampal high affinity nicotinic acetylcholine receptor upregulation (2012) · cites this paper as Cosgrove et al., 2009
Nicotine abuse is associated with upregulation of the nicotinic receptor.
“Imaging studies of nicotine abuse report upregulation of the nicotinic receptor (Cosgrove et al., 2009; Mukhin et al., 2008; Staley et al., 2006; Wullner et al., 2008)”
From Imaging addiction: D2 receptors and dopamine signaling in the striatum as biomarkers for impulsivity (2014) · cites this paper as Cosgrove et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
One-day post hoc comparisons are called significant above the stated threshold
MajorThe reported corrected p-values of 0.007 and 0.023 both exceed the paper's stated post hoc significance threshold of 0.00625, yet both comparisons are called significant.
“Compared to 1 week abstinent smokers, 1 day abstinent smokers had significantly lower VT/fP in the thalamus (t[25]=-3.51, corrected p=0.007) and cerebellum (t[25]=-3.02, corrected p=0.023).”
“For these post hoc tests, p-values were Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons, and statistical significance was considered at p≤0.00625.”
Abstract overlooks a significant four-week cortical difference
MinorThe abstract says cortical availability was not different from nonsmokers at four weeks, while the Results report significantly higher availability in the occipital cortex at that time.
“β2*-nAChR availability in the striatum, cortex and cerebellum of smokers was not different at one day of abstinence, significantly higher at 1week of abstinence and not different at 4 or 6-12 weeks of abstinence.”
“In 4 week abstinent smokers as compared to nonsmokers, VT/fP was significantly higher in the occipital cortex (Table 3 and Figures 1 and 2).”
Cites
The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire
HEATHERTON, T. F., KOZLOWSKI, L. T., FRECKER, R. C., & FAGERSTROM, K. (1991) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x · Cited by 10,738 · see citing works
Consensus Nomenclature for <i>in vivo</i> Imaging of Reversibly Binding Radioligands
Innis, R. B., Cunningham, V. J., Delforge, J., Fujita, M., Gjedde, A., Gunn, R. N., Holden, J., Houle, S., Huang, S.-C., Ichise, M., et al. (2007) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600493 · Cited by 1,955 · see citing works
Picciotto, M. R., Zoli, M., Rimondini, R., Léna, C., Marubio, L. M., Pich, E. M., Fuxe, K., & Changeux, J.-P. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/34413 · Cited by 1,320 · see citing works
The development and initial validation of a questionnaire on smoking urges
TIFFANY, S. T., & DROBES, D. J. (1991) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01732.x · Cited by 974 · see citing works
Activation of memory circuits during cue-elicited cocaine craving.
Grant, S., London, E. D., Newlin, D. B., Villemagne, V. L., Liu, X., Contoreggi, C., Phillips, R. L., Kimes, A. S., & Margolin, A. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.21.12040 · Cited by 936 · see citing works
Porro, C. A., Francescato, M. P., Cettolo, V., Diamond, M. E., Baraldi, P., Zuiani, C., Bazzocchi, M., & di Prampero, P. E. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-23-07688.1996 · Cited by 924 · see citing works
Flores, C. M., Rogers, S. W., Pabreza, L. A., Wolfe, B. B., & Kellar, K. J. (1992) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0026-895x(25)08832-7 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
Effects of abstinence from tobacco: Valid symptoms and time course
Hughes, J. (2007) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200701188919 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Cerebellum Implicated in Sensory Acquisition and Discrimination Rather Than Motor Control
Gao, J., Parsons, L. M., Bower, J. M., Xiong, J., Li, J., & Fox, P. T. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5261.545 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Hester, R., & Garavan, H. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3321-04.2004 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Remembering the past: two facets of episodic memory explored with positron emission tomography
(1995) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.152.11.1576 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Benwell, M. E. M., Balfour, D. J. K., & Anderson, J. M. (1988) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb10600.x · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Neurobiologic processes in drug reward and addiction
Adinoff, B. (2004) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/10673220490910844 · Cited by 546 · see citing works
Reduced antinociception in mice lacking neuronal nicotinic receptor subunits
Marubio, L. M., Jiménez, M. D. M. A., Cordero‐Erausquin, M., Léna, C., Novère, N. G. L., d’Exaerde, A. D. K., Huchet, M., Damaj, M. I., & Changeux, J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19756 · Cited by 533 · see citing works
Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptor Binding Sites in the Brain: Regulation in Vivo
Schwartz, R. D., & Kellar, K. J. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6828889 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
PICCIOTTO, M., ADDY, N., MINEUR, Y., & BRUNZELL, D. (2008) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.12.005 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Due, D. L., Huettel, S. A., HALL, W. G., & Rubin, D. C. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.954 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Benwell, M. E. M., & Balfour, D. J. K. (1992) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb09067.x · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Effect of smoking history on [3H]nicotine binding in human postmortem brain
Breese, C. R., Marks, M. J., Logel, J., Adams, C. E., Sullivan, B., Collins, A. C., & Leonard, S. (1997) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(24)36798-9 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Peng, X., Gerzanich, V, Anand, R., Whiting, P. J., & Lindstrom, J. (1994) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0026-895x(25)09730-5 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Cigarette Smoking Saturates Brain α4β2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
Brody, A. L., Mandelkern, M. A., London, E. D., Olmstead, R. E., Farahi, J., Scheibal, D., Jou, J., Allen, V., Tiongson, E., Chefer, S. I., et al. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.907 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Increased nicotinic receptors in brains from smokers: membrane binding and autoradiography studies
Perry, D. C., Dávila-Garcı́a, M. I., Stockmeier, C. A., & Kellar, K. J. (1999) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(24)38304-1 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Regional brain metabolic activation during craving elicited by recall of previous drug experiences
Wang, G.-J., Volkow, N. D., Fowler, J. S., Cervany, P., Hitzemann, R. J., Pappas, N. R., Wong, C. T., & Felder, C. (1999) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0024-3205(98)00619-5 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Subcortical Correlates of Craving in Recently Abstinent Alcoholic Patients
Schneider, F. W., Habel, U., Wagner, M., Franke, P. E., Salloum, J. B., Shah, N. J., Toni, I., Sulzbach, C., Hönig, K., Maier, W., et al. (2001) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.1075 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Neural Substrates of Resisting Craving During Cigarette Cue Exposure
Brody, A. L., Mandelkern, M. A., Olmstead, R. E., Jou, J., Tiongson, E., Allen, V., Scheibal, D., London, E. D., Monterosso, J. R., Tiffany, S. T., et al. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.10.026 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Nashmi, R., Xiao, C., Deshpande, P., McKinney, S., Grady, S. R., Whiteaker, P., Huang, Q., McClure-Begley, T., Lindstrom, J. M., Labarca, C., et al. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2199-07.2007 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Implications of CYP2A6 Genetic Variation for Smoking Behaviors and Nicotine Dependence*
Malaiyandi, V., Sellers, E. M., & Tyndale, R. F. (2005) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clpt.2004.10.011 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Time course study of the effects of chronic nicotine infusion on drug response and brain receptors
Marks, M. J., Stitzel, J. A., & Collins, A. C. (1985) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)24213-6 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Nicotine upregulates its own receptors through enhanced intracellular maturation
Sallette, J., Pons, S., Devillers-Thiery, A., Soudant, M., Prado de Carvalho, L., Changeux, J.-P., & Corringer, P. J. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.029 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Smoking in Patients Receiving Psychotropic Medications: A Pharmacokinetic Perspective
Desai, H. D., Seabolt, J., & Jann, M. W. (2001) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.2165/00023210-200115060-00005 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Cunnington, R., Windischberger, C., Deecke, L., & Moser, E. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00291-x · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Smolka, M. N., Bühler, M., Klein, S., Zimmermann, U., Mann, K., Heinz, A., & Braus, D. F. (2006) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-005-0080-x · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Staley, J. K., Krishnan-Sarin, S., Cosgrove, K. P., Krantzler, E., Frohlich, E., Perry, E., Dubin, J. A., Estok, K., Brenner, E., Baldwin, R. M., et al. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0546-06.2006 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationTobacco withdrawal symptoms: An experimental analysis
Hatsukami, D. K., Hughes, J. R., Pickens, R. W., & Svikis, D. S. (1984) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00427451 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Cui, C., Booker, T. K., Allen, R. S., Grady, S. R., Whiteaker, P., Marks, M. J., Salminen, O., Tritto, T., Butt, C. M., Allen, W. R., et al. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-35-11045.2003 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Jackson, K. J., Martin, B. R., Changeux, J. P., & Damaj, M. I. (2008) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.107.132977 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Walters, C. L., Brown, S., Changeux, J.-P., Martin, B., & Damaj, M. I. (2006) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-005-0295-x · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Ksir, C., Hakan, R., Hall, D. P., & Kellar, K. J. (1985) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/0028-3908(85)90058-9 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Nashmi, R., Dickinson, M. E., McKinney, S., Jareb, M., Labarca, C., Fraser, S. E., & Lester, H. A. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-37-11554.2003 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Roll, J. M., Higgins, S. T., & Badger, G. J. (1996) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-495 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Smoking Topography, Brand Switching, and Nicotine Delivery: Results from an In vivo Study
Hammond, D. G., Fong, G. T., Cummings, K. M., & Hyland, A. J. (2005) · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-04-0498 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
5-Iodo-A-85380, an α4β2 Subtype-Selective Ligand for Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
Mukhin, A. G., Gündisch, D., Horti, A. G., Koren, A. O., Tamagnan, G., Kimes, A. S., Chambers, J., Vaupel, D. B., King, S. L., Picciotto, M. R., et al. (2000) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.57.3.642 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationGrady, S. R., Meinerz, N. M., Cao, J., Reynolds, A. M., Picciotto, M. R., Changeux, J., McIntosh, J. M., Marks, M. J., & Collins, A. C. (2001) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00019.x · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Lee, J.-H., Lim, Y., Wiederhold, B. K., & Graham, S. J. (2005) · Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback · doi:10.1007/s10484-005-6377-z · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Pauly, J. R., Marks, M. J., Gross, S. D., & Collins, A. C. (1991) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)20464-5 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Abreu-Villaça, Y., Seidler, F. J., Qiao, D., Tate, C. A., Cousins, M. M., Thillai, I., & Slotkin, T. A. (2003) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300221 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Nguyen, H. N., Rasmussen, B. A., & Perry, D. C. (2003) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.103.056408 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Flores, C. M., Dávila‐García, M. I., Ulrich‐Lai, Y. M., & Kellar, K. J. (1997) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69052216.x · Cited by 142 · see citing works
PET Studies of the Influences of Nicotine on Neural Systems in Cigarette Smokers
Rose, J. E., Behm, F. M., Westman, E. C., Mathew, R. J., London, E. D., Hawk, T. C., Turkington, T. G., & Coleman, R. E. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.323 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Mukhin, A. G., Kimes, A. S., Chefer, S. I., Matochik, J. A., Contoreggi, C. S., Horti, A. G., Vaupel, D. B., Pavlova, O., & Stein, E. A. (2008) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.050716 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Mao, D., Perry, D. C., Yasuda, R. P., Wolfe, B. B., & Kellar, K. J. (2008) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05011.x · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Lewis, D. (2003) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867033456855 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Dwoskin, L. P., Teng, L., Buxton, S. T., & Crooks, P. A. (1999) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(24)38040-1 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Genetic Variability in CYP2A6 and the Pharmacokinetics of Nicotine
Mwenifumbo, J. C., & Tyndale, R. F. (2007) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.2217/14622416.8.10.1385 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Lai, A., Parameswaran, N., Khwaja, M., Whiteaker, P., Lindstrom, J. M., Fan, H., McIntosh, J. M., Grady, S. R., & Quik, M. (2005) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.104.006429 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Shoaib, M., Gommans, J., Morley, A., Stolerman, I. P., Grailhe, R., & Changeux, J.-P. (2002) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0028-3908(01)00194-0 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Long-term effects of chronic nicotine exposure on brain nicotinic receptors
Besson, M., Granon, S., Mameli-Engvall, M., Cloëz-Tayarani, I., Maubourguet, N., Cormier, A., Cazala, P., David, V., Changeux, J., & Fauré, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702698104 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Sex difference in up-regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat brain
Koylu, E., Demirgören, S., London, E. D., & Pöǧün, S. (1997) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0024-3205(97)00665-6 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Benowitz, N. L., Porchet, H. C., & Jacob, P. (1989) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62487-5 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Temporal Change in Human Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor After Smoking Cessation: 5IA SPECT Study
Mamede, M., Ishizu, K., Ueda, M., Mukai, T., Iida, Y., Kawashima, H., Fukuyama, H., Togashi, K., & Saji, H. (2007) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.043471 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Epping-Jordan, M. P., Picciotto, M. R., Changeux, J.-P., & Pich, E. M. (1999) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130051135 · Cited by 86 · cited 10× · see citing works
“011), parietal cortex (F[4,25]=2.”
InfluentialMarks, M. J., Rowell, P. P., Cao, J., Grady, S. R., McCallum, S. E., & Collins, A. C. (2004) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.02.009 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
CONTINGENT PAYMENT PROCEDURES FOR SMOKING REDUCTION AND CESSATION
Stitzer, M. L., Rand, C. S., Bigelow, G. E., & Mead, A. M. (1986) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1986.19-197 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Sallette, J., Bohler, S., Benoit, P., Soudant, M., Pons, S., Le Novère, N., Changeux, J.-P., & Corringer, P. J. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m308260200 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Collins, A. C., Romm, E., & Wehner, J. M. (1990) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0361-9230(90)90222-l · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Perez, X. A., Bordia, T., McIntosh, J. M., Grady, S. R., & Quik, M. (2008) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.108.048843 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Harkness, P. C., & Millar, N. S. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-23-10172.2002 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Wu, J., Liu, Q., Yu, K., Hu, J., Kuo, Y., Segerberg, M., John, P. A. S., & Lukas, R. J. (2006) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.114645 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Besson, M., David, V., Suarez, S., Cormier, A., Cazala, P., Changeux, J.-P., & Granon, S. (2006) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0418-z · Cited by 73 · see citing works
McCallum, S. E., Collins, A. C., Paylor, R. E., & Marks, M. J. (2005) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-005-0076-6 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Brunzell, D. H., Chang, J. R., Schneider, B., Olausson, P., Taylor, J. R., & Picciotto, M. R. (2006) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-005-0099-z · Cited by 71 · see citing works
King, S. L., Caldarone, B. J., & Picciotto, M. R. (2004) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.06.024 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Pietilä, K., Lähde, T., Attila, M., Ahtee, L., & Nordberg, A. (1998) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/pl00005152 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Age-related decline in nicotinic receptor availability with [123I]5-IA-85380 SPECT
Mitsis, E. M., Cosgrove, K. P., Staley, J. K., Bois, F., Frohlich, E. B., Tamagnan, G. D., Estok, K. M., Seibyl, J. P., & van Dyck, C. H. (2009) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.12.008 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationChefer, S. I., Horti, A. G., Lee, K. S., Koren, A. O., Jones, D. W., Gorey, J. G., Links, J. M., Mukhin, A. G., Weinberger, D. R., & London, E. D. (1998) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0024-3205(98)00514-1 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Fujita, M., Seibyl, J. P., Vaupel, B. D., Tamagnan, G., Early, M., Zoghbi, S. S., Baldwin, R. M., Horti, A. G., Koren, A. O., Mukhin, A. G., et al. (2002) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-001-0695-z · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationTritto, T., McCallum, S. E., Waddle, S., Hutton, S. R., Paylor, R. E., Collins, A. C., & Marks, M. J. (2004) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200310001656966 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Human functional neuroimaging in nicotine and tobacco research: Basics, background, and beyond
McClernon, F. J., & Gilbert, D. (2004) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200412331337394 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Stitzer, M. L., & Bigelow, G. E. (1985) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/0306-4603(85)90030-9 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Horti, A. G., Koren, A. O., Lee, K. S., Mukhin, A. G., Vaupel, D. B., Kimes, A. S., Stratton, M., & London, E. D. (1999) · Nuclear Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/s0969-8051(98)00086-9 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
McCallum, S. E., Parameswaran, N., Bordia, T., Fan, H., McIntosh, J. M., & Quik, M. (2006) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.106.104414 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
McCallum, S. E., Parameswaran, N., Bordia, T., Fan, H., Tyndale, R. F., Langston, J. W., McIntosh, J. M., & Quik, M. (2006) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03646.x · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Dávila‐García, M. I., Musachio, J. L., & Kellar, K. J. (2003) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01774.x · Cited by 42 · see citing works
(2005) · PubMed · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationZoghbi, S. S., Tamagnan, G. D., Fujita, M., Baldwin, R. M., Al‐Tikriti, M. S., Amici, L., Seibyl, J. P., & Innis, R. B. (2001) · Nuclear Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/s0969-8051(00)00188-8 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationUeda, M., Iida, Y., Mukai, T., Mamede, M., Ishizu, K., Ogawa, M., Magata, Y., Konishi, J., & Saji, H. (2004) · Annals of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02984473 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Liu, X., Koren, A. O., Yee, S. K., Pechnick, R. N., Poland, R. E., & London, E. D. (2003) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200308060-00020 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Baldwin, R. M., Zoghbi, S. S., Staley, J. K., Brenner, E., Al-Tikriti, M. S., Amici, L., Fujita, M., Innis, R. B., & Tamagnan, G. (2006) · Nuclear Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.03.002 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [83]Walters CL, Brown S, Changeux JP, Martin B, Damaj MI. The beta2 but not alpha7 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is required for nicotine-conditioned place preference in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;184:339–44. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0295-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [84]Brunzell DH, Chang JR, Schneider B, Olausson P, Taylor JR, Picciotto MR. beta2-Subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are involved in nicotine-induced increases in conditioned reinforcement but not progressive ratio responding for food in C57BL/6 mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;184:328–38. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0099-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive Effects of Nicotine: Recent Progress
Valentine, G. W., & Sofuoglu, M. (2017) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x15666171103152136 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
“The slow return of nAChRs to baseline levels may contribute to the symptoms of nicotine withdrawal, including cognitive difficulties, as the delayed nAChR recovery was identified in the cortex and cerebellum, brain regions with important roles in human cognition [133, 134].”
BackgroundWhy do patients with schizophrenia smoke?
Winterer, G. (2010) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e3283366643 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Smoking, quitting, and psychiatric disease: A review
Aubin, H., Rollema, H., Svensson, T. H., & Winterer, G. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.06.007 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Brain Imaging of Nicotinic Receptors in Alzheimer's Disease
Wu, J., Ishikawa, M., Zhang, J., & Hashimoto, K. (2010) · International Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.4061/2010/548913 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Imaging addiction: D2 receptors and dopamine signaling in the striatum as biomarkers for impulsivity
Trifilieff, P., & Martinez, D. (2014) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.06.031 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
“Imaging studies of nicotine abuse report upregulation of the nicotinic receptor (Cosgrove et al., 2009; Mukhin et al., 2008; Staley et al., 2006; Wullner et al., 2008) and an imaging study of opiate abusers showed upregulation of the mu receptor (Zubieta et al., 2000).”
BackgroundCognitive function during nicotine withdrawal: Implications for nicotine dependence treatment
Ashare, R. L., Falcone, M., & Lerman, C. (2014) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.034 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
“Further, following cessation of smoking, unbound nAChRs are present at a higher level for as long as one week, and nAChR binding availability has been associated with self-reported withdrawal and craving (Cosgrove et al., 2009; Staley et al., 2006).”
Dual role of nicotine in addiction and cognition: A review of neuroimaging studies in humans
Jasinska, A. J., Zorick, T. S., Brody, A. L., & Stein, E. A. (2013) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.02.015 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
“…2-FA and 5-IA, have demonstrated up-regulation of available a4b2* nAChRs in smokers compared to non-smoking participants in brain regions other than the thalamus (Brody et al., 2012; Cosgrove et al., 2009, 2012; Mamede et al., 2007; Mukhin et al., 2008; Staley et al., 2006; Wullner et al., 2008).”
Loughead, J., Ray, R., Wileyto, E. P., Ruparel, K., Sanborn, P. M., Siegel, S. J., Gur, R. C., & Lerman, C. E. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.01.016 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Saricicek, A., Esterlis, I., Maloney, K. H., Mineur, Y. S., Ruf, B. M., Muralidharan, A., Chen, J. I., Cosgrove, K. P., Kerestes, R., Ghose, S., et al. (2012) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11101546 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
“Studies suggest that tobacco smokers have higher β2*-nAChR availability compared with non-smokers in non-psychiatric populations (34) which normalizes by 6–12 weeks of abstinence (44).”
BackgroundSelf-citationUp-regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in menthol cigarette smokers
Brody, A. L., Mukhin, A. G., Charite, J. L., Ta, K., Farahi, J. B., Sugar, C. A., Mamoun, M. S., Vellios, E. E., Archie, M. M., Kozman, M., et al. (2012) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s1461145712001022 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Hillmer, A. T., Esterlis, I., Gallezot, J., Bois, F., Zheng, M.-Q., Nabulsi, N., Lin, S., Papke, R. L., Huang, Y. H., Sabri, O., et al. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.026 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“For example, differences in 5-[123I]IA-85380 parent fraction and fP were reported between nonsmokers and abstinent smokers (Cosgrove et al., 2009), and betweenmen andwomen (Cosgrove et al., 2007).”
InfluentialSelf-citationInside-out neuropharmacology of nicotinic drugs
Henderson, B. J., & Lester, H. A. (2015) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.01.022 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“Upregulation of AChRs in humans has been detected by comparing [3H]nicotine binding to postmortem brains of smokers and non-smokers and in vivo by fMRI or PET imaging (Benwell et al., 1988; Breese et al., 1997; Brody et al., 2013, 2008, 2011, 2006; Cosgrove et al., 2009; Jasinska et al., 2014; Mamede et al., 2007; Per…”
Cosgrove, K. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1465 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationWithdrawal: Expanding a Key Addiction Construct
Piper, M. E. (2015) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv048 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Parikh, V., Kutlu, M. G., & Gould, T. J. (2016) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2016.01.020 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“…underlying dependence involves desensitization and long-lasting upregulation of α4β2 nAChRs, which may contribute to heightened nicotine reward sensitivity and increase relapse vulnerability (Cosgrove et al., 2009; Hilario et al., 2012; Kenny and Markou, 2006; Picciotto et al., 2008).”
BackgroundEffects of Menthol on Nicotine Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacology and Dependence in Mice
AlSharari, S. D., King, J. R., Nordman, J. C., Muldoon, P. P., Jackson, A. B., Zhu, A. Z. X., Tyndale, R. F., Kabbani, N., & Damaj, M. I. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137070 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Effect of Secondhand Smoke on Occupancy of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Brain
Brody, A. L. (2011) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.51 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Epigenetic dysregulation of protocadherins in human disease
Hajj, N. E., Dittrich, M. T., & Haaf, T. (2017) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.007 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Ovarian Hormones and Drug Abuse
Maria, M. M. M., Flanagan, J. C., & Brady, K. T. (2014) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-014-0511-7 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Turner, J. R., Castellano, L. M., & Blendy, J. A. (2011) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq206 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Pharmacological chaperoning of nAChRs: A therapeutic target for Parkinson's disease
Srinivasan, R., Henderson, B. J., Lester, H. A., & Richards, C. I. (2014) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2014.02.005 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Ditre, J. W., Zale, E. L., LaRowe, L. R., Kosiba, J. D., & Vita, M. J. D. (2018) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000353 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“This is consistent with previous findings that both central and peripheral nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) mediate the effects of nicotine deprivation on somatic symptoms of nicotine withdrawal (e.g., Cosgrove et al., 2009).”
Bacher, I. (2011) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.82 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Parvaz, M. A., Rabin, R. A., Adams, F., & Goldstein, R. Z. (2022) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109319 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Brody, A. L., Hubert, R., Enoki, R., Garcia, L. Y., Mamoun, M. S., Okita, K., London, E. D., Nurmi, E. L., Seaman, L. C., & Mandelkern, M. A. (2017) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2017.48 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“Of note, the fact that study results were global (rather than regional) is also consistent with prior research demonstrating widespread effects of smoking on brain receptors (Brody et al, 2006a, 2009a, 2011, 2013; Cosgrove et al, 2009; Staley et al, 2006).”
BackgroundResultXie, P., Kranzler, H. R., Krauthammer, M. O., Cosgrove, K., Oslin, D. W., Anton, R. F., Farrer, L. A., Picciotto, M. R., Krystal, J. H., Zhao, H., et al. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.04.017 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationBaldassarri, S. R., Hillmer, A. T., Anderson, J. M., Jatlow, P. I., Nabulsi, N., Labaree, D. C., Cosgrove, K., O’Malley, S. S., Eissenberg, T., Krishnan‐Sarin, S., et al. (2017) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntx091 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationAddiction‐related neuroadaptations following chronic nicotine exposure
Wills, L., & Kenny, P. J. (2021) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.15356 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Lower β2*-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Availability in Smokers With Schizophrenia
D’Souza, D. C., Esterlis, I., Carbuto, M., Krasenics, M., Seibyl, J. P., Bois, F., Pittman, B. P., Ranganathan, M., Cosgrove, K., & Staley, J. K. (2011) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020189 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationCraving among long-abstinent smokers: An Internet survey
Hughes, J. R. (2010) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq009 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“…syndrome (Satel, Kosten, Schuckit, & Fischman, 1993; Schuckit, Kosten, & Fischman, 1994); however, in smokers, nicotine receptors appear to return to their normal state in 6–12 weeks of abstinence (Cosgrove et al., 2009) and prolonged nicotine withdrawal does not appear to exist (Hughes, 1994).”
BackgroundNicotinic Receptor Contributions to Smoking: Insights from Human Studies and Animal Models
Brunzell, D. H., Stafford, A. M., & Dixon, C. I. (2015) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-015-0042-2 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Gould, T. J., Portugal, G. S., André, J. M., Tadman, M. P., Marks, M. J., Kenney, J. W., Yildirim, E., & Adoff, M. (2012) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.01.003 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“Abstinent smokers compared to nonsmokers had higher levels of b2* nAChRs, which returned to baseline between 3e12 weeks, and elevated nAChR levels correlated with urge to smoke (Cosgrove et al., 2009; Mamede et al., 2007; Staley et al., 2006).”
The nicotinic cholinergic system function in the human brain
Nees, F. (2014) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.10.021 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Esterlis, I., Ranganathan, M., Bois, F., Pittman, B. P., Picciotto, M. R., Shearer, L., Anticevic, A., Carlson, J., Niciu, M. J., Cosgrove, K., et al. (2013) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.11.001 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationEsterlis, I., Hannestad, J. O., Perkins, E., Bois, F., D’Souza, D. C., Tyndale, R. F., Seibyl, J. P., Hatsukami, D., Cosgrove, K., & O’Malley, S. S. (2013) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12060793 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationAnderson, S. M., & Brunzell, D. H. (2015) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.13090 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“It is not known whether β2*nAChR expression correlates with anxiety-disorder diagnosis, but smokers, compared with nonsmokers, show significant elevations in high-affinity β2*nAChR binding (Benwell et al., 1988; Breese et al., 1997; Cosgrove et al., 2009) and are more anxious overall than non-smokers (Tsuda et al.”
BackgroundReward Sensitization: Effects of Repeated Nicotine Exposure and Withdrawal in Mice
Hilário, M. R. F., Turner, J. R., & Blendy, J. A. (2012) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2012.130 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“Similarly, imaging studies in humans proposed a functional role of these up-regulated nAChRs in relapse vulnerability (Cosgrove et al, 2009).”
BackgroundResultA cognitive phenotype for a polymorphism in the nicotinic receptor gene CHRNA4
Greenwood, P. M., Parasuraman, R., & Espeseth, T. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.010 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Effects of Smoking Cessation on Presynaptic Dopamine Function of Addicted Male Smokers
Rademacher, L., Prinz, S., Winz, O., Henkel, K., Dietrich, C., Schmaljohann, J., Shali, S. M., Schabram, I., Stoppe, C., Cumming, P. D., et al. (2015) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.11.009 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“The data rather suggest that K is lower than in nonsmokers as a consequence of chronic smoking and normalizes through prolonged abstinence, in analogy to the previously reported changes in D1 receptors (9), metabotropic glutamate receptors (40), and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, which were found to normalize to n…”
BackgroundResultPathophysiology of nAChRs: Limbic circuits and related disorders
Mineur, Y. S., Soares, A. R., Etherington, I. M., Abdulla, Z. I., & Picciotto, M. R. (2023) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106745 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
The therapeutic potential of exercise for neuropsychiatric diseases: A review
Swenson, S., Blum, K., McLaughlin, T., Gold, M. S., & Thanos, P. K. (2020) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2020.116763 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Chronic Nicotine Exposure Alters the Neurophysiology of Habenulo-Interpeduncular Circuitry
Arvin, M. C., Jin, X.-T., Yan, Y., Wang, Y., Ramsey, M. D., Kim, V. J., Beckley, N. A., Henry, B. A., & Drenan, R. M. (2019) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2816-18.2019 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“Human brain-imaging studies have confirmed that smoking leads to the upregulation of high-affinity nAChRs, which is sustained for 3– 4 weeks following the discontinuation of nicotine exposure (Mamede et al., 2007; Mukhin et al., 2008; Cosgrove et al., 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialBrain Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Availability and Response to Smoking Cessation Treatment
Brody, A. L., Mukhin, A. G., Mamoun, M. S., Luu, T., Neary, M. K., Liang, L., Shieh, J., Sugar, C. A., Rose, J. E., & Mandelkern, M. A. (2014) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.138 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Imaging Receptor Changes in Human Drug Abusers
Cosgrove, K. (2009) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2009_24 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“5-HT transporter availability has been reported to be lower (Heinz et al. 1998; Szabo et al. 2004) and similar ( Brown et al. 2007 ) in recent and long-term”
InfluentialSelf-citationProgress and challenges in the study of α6-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
Letchworth, S. R., & Whiteaker, P. (2011) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.022 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Tobacco smoking and dopaminergic function in humans: a meta-analysis of molecular imaging studies
Ashok, A. H., Mizuno, Y., & Howes, O. D. (2019) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-019-05196-1 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“…imaging studies have shown that occupancy of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is associated with the subjective hedonic response of smoking (Brody et al. 2009a, 2011, 2006a, 2014, 2013; Cosgrove et al. 2009a; Cosgrove et al. 2012; Dubroff et al. 2015; Lotfipour et al. 2012; Staley et al. 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialNicotine: Pharmacology, Toxicity and Therapeutic use
Fagerström, K. O. (2014) · The Journal of Smoking Cessation · doi:10.1017/jsc.2014.27 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“This readaptation differ for individuals but some data for the important nAChR subtype beta 2 subunit suggest that it normalizes to nonsmoker levels by 6–12 weeks of abstinence from tobacco smoking (Cosgrove et al., 2009).”
BackgroundCosgrove, K., Esterlis, I., McKee, S. A., Bois, F., Alagille, D., Tamagnan, G. D., Seibyl, J. P., Krishnan‐Sarin, S., & Staley, J. K. (2010) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq040 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationKnott, V., Millar, A., McIntosh, J. F., Shah, D. K., Fisher, D. J., Blais, C. M., Ilivitsky, V., & Horn, E. (2011) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.06.012 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Esterlis, I., Cosgrove, K., Batis, J. C., Bois, F., Stiklus, S. M., Perkins, E., Seibyl, J. P., Carson, R. E., & Staley, J. K. (2010) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.072447 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“Changes in ligand binding to the high-affinity state of b2*-nAChRs have been demonstrated in tobacco smoking (1,2) and psychiatric and neurocognitive disorders including schizophrenia (3,4) and Alzheimer disease (5,6).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBrody, A. L., Gehlbach, D. L., Garcia, L. Y., Enoki, R., Hoh, C. K., Vera, D. R., Kotta, K. K., London, E. D., Okita, K., Nurmi, E. L., et al. (2018) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-018-5077-3 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“…effect found here is consistent with prior research demonstrating global effects of smoking on other molecules (such as nAChRs) that are located throughout the brain (Brody et al. 2006a; Brody et al. 2009a; Brody et al. 2011; Brody et al. 2013; Cosgrove et al. 2009; Staley et al. 2006).”
Treatment for Tobacco Dependence: Effect on Brain Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Density
Brody, A. L., Mukhin, A. G., Shulenberger, S., Mamoun, M. S., Kozman, M., Phuong, J., Neary, M. K., Luu, T., & Mandelkern, M. A. (2013) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2013.53 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“In follow-up scanning, nAChR upregulation in smokers was found to normalize to levels of non-smokers when participants were given contingency management to maintain abstinence for roughly 3 (Mamede et al, 2007) to 12 (Cosgrove et al, 2009) weeks.”
BackgroundJackson, A. B., Bağdaş, D., Muldoon, P. P., Lichtman, A. H., Carroll, F. I., Greenwald, M. K., Miles, M. F., & Damaj, M. I. (2017) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.03.005 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Fasoli, F., Moretti, M., Zoli, M., Pistillo, F., Crespi, A., Clementi, F., McClure‐Begley, T. D., Marks, M. J., & Gotti, C. (2016) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.04.048 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Jones, S. K., Wolf, B. J., Froeliger, B., Wallace, K., Carpenter, M. J., & Alberg, A. J. (2021) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntab175 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Decreased Nicotinic Receptor Availability in Smokers with Slow Rates of Nicotine Metabolism
Dubroff, J. G., Doot, R. K., Falcone, M., Schnoll, R. A., Ray, R., Tyndale, R. F., Brody, A. L., Hou, C., Schmitz, A. M. T., & Lerman, C. E. (2015) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.155002 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“SPECT molecular imaging studies of the nAChR a4b2* subtype have also shown that nAChR availability in smokers peaks after 1 wk of abstinence (22,24), suggesting the persistent occupation of nAChRs by nicotine.”
BackgroundDivergent Functional Effects of Sazetidine-A and Varenicline During Nicotine Withdrawal
Turner, J. R., Wilkinson, D. S., Poole, R. L., Gould, T. J., Carlson, G. C., & Blendy, J. A. (2013) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2013.105 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Imaging Tobacco Smoking with PET and SPECT
Cosgrove, K., Esterlis, I., Sandiego, C. M., Petrulli, J. R., & Morris, E. D. (2015) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13482-6_1 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“This study (Cosgrove et al. 2009) and others (Brody et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBoggs, D. L., Carlson, J., Cortes-Briones, J., Krystal, J. H., & D’Souza, D. C. (2014) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612819666131216121019 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“In the presence of an agonist such as nicotine the α4β2 concentrations increase or undergo upregulation [29, 30].”
BackgroundNicotine administration in healthy non-smokers reduces appetite but does not alter plasma ghrelin
Pilhatsch, M., Scheuing, H., Kroemer, N. B., et al. (2014) · Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.2405 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“In regular smokers, nicotine receptors are usually occupied unless smoking is discontinued for at least 24 h (Cosgrove et al., 2009).”
BackgroundCole, R. D., Poole, R. L., Guzman, D. M., Gould, T. J., & Parikh, V. (2014) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-014-3754-4 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“Previous animal and human research indicates that chronic nicotine-induced neuroadaptations underlying dependence involves desensitization and long-lasting upregulation of α4β2 nAChRs contributing to heightened nicotine reward sensitivity and increase relapse vulnerability (Kenny and Markou 2006; Cosgrove et al. 2009;…”
Hussmann, G. P., DeDominicis, K. E., Turner, J. R., Yasuda, R. P., Klehm, J., Forcelli, P. A., Xiao, Y., Richardson, J. R., Sahibzada, N., Wolfe, B. B., et al. (2014) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.12653 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“, 1999), as well as in brain imaging studies of current smokers (Staley et al., 2006; Wüllner et al., 2008; Cosgrove et al., 2009).”
Selegiline Transdermal System (STS) as an Aid for Smoking Cessation
Kahn, R., Gorgon, L., Jones, K. M., McSherry, F., Glover, E. D., Anthenelli, R. M., Jackson, T., Williams, J. M., Murtaugh, C., Montoya, I. D., et al. (2011) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr143 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Zuo, Y., Rabinovich, N. E., & Gilbert, D. G. (2016) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-016-4509-1 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“…risk for relapse could reflect a combination of smoking-and abstinence-related long-lasting neuropharmacological and biological processes (e.g., Cosgrove et al. 2009; Gilbert et al. 1999; Gilbert et al. 2003; Koob et al. 2014), environmental events (e.g., stressors or conditioned stimuli;…”
Fischer, S., Hiller, A., Smits, R., Hoepping, A., Funke, U., Wenzel, B., Cumming, P. D., Sabri, O., Steinbach, J., & Brust, P. (2013) · Applied Radiation and Isotopes · doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.01.002 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
McCaul, M. E., Wand, G. S., Kuwabara, H., Dannals, R. F., Wong, D. F., & Xu, X. (2019) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntz080 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Bidirectional Associations among Nicotine and Tobacco Smoke, NeuroHIV, and Antiretroviral Therapy
Ghura, S., Gross, R., Jordan‐Sciutto, K. L., Dubroff, J. G., Schnoll, R. A., Collman, R. G., & Ashare, R. L. (2019) · Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s11481-019-09897-4 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“One study found that, during nicotine withdrawal, nAChR availability, measured via SPECT (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography) imaging, peaked one week following initiation of abstinence (Cosgrove et al. 2009).”
BackgroundBrody, A. L., Hubert, R., Mamoun, M. S., Enoki, R., Garcia, L. Y., Abraham, P., Young, P., & Mandelkern, M. A. (2016) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-016-4367-x · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Recent studies using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (Cosgrove et al. 2009; Mamede et al. 2007; Staley et al. 2006) and positron emission tomography (PET) (Brody et al. 2013; Mukhin et al. 2008; Wullner et al. 2008) have consistently demonstrated significant upregulation of these receptors in smoker…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEffects of nicotine deprivation on current pain intensity among daily cigarette smokers.
LaRowe, L. R., Kosiba, J. D., Zale, E. L., & Ditre, J. W. (2018) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000218 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“There is also some evidence that greater nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) availability during periods of smoking abstinence may be positively associated with greater experimental pain reactivity (Cosgrove et al., 2009, 2010).”
Govind, A. P., Vallejo, Y. F., Stolz, J. R., Yan, J.-Z., Swanson, G. T., & Green, W. N. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.25651 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Recent studies using PET imaging in humans found that reversal of a4b2R upregulation was correlated with less smoking relapse (Brody et al., 2013; Staley et al., 2006; Cosgrove et al., 2009).”
BackgroundHillmer, A. T., Wooten, D., Slesarev, M. S., Ahlers, E. O., Barnhart, T. E., Schneider, M. L., Mukherjee, J., & Christian, B. T. (2013) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2013.136 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Nicotine Addiction: Mechanisms and Consequences
Rosenthal, D. G., Weitzman, M. L., & Benowitz, N. L. (2011) · International Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.2753/imh0020-7411400102 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“The amount of nicotine inhaled by a typical smoker results in almost full saturation (desensitization) of α4β2 nAChRs [28, 39, 40].”
BackgroundHillmer, A. T., Tudorascu, D., Wooten, D. W., et al. (2014) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.01.027 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Scientific Evidence for the Addictiveness of Tobacco and Smoking Cessation in Tobacco Litigation
Roh, S. (2017) · Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health · doi:10.3961/jpmph.16.088 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Lee, H., Jeon, Y., Yoo, C., Seon, H., Park, J., Hwang, M., Baek, K., & Chung, D. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29547-3 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“95e−03), smoked for more years (t(46) = 13.”
BackgroundSimmons, S. J., & Gould, T. J. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/jcpt.12171 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Related studies using iodide 123-labelled 5iodo-A-85380 ([(123)I]5-IA; herein referred to as 5IA) SPECT imaging provided evidence that smokers have increased levels of a4b2* nAChRs in thalamic, striatal and cortical brain regions at 1 week but not 24 h into withdrawal relative to non-smokers.(26,79) Notably,”
MethodJensen, K. P., Smith, A. H., Herman, A. I., Farrer, L. A., Kranzler, H. R., Sofuoglu, M., & Gelernter, J. E. (2016) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2016.43 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Abreu‐Villaça, Y., Correa‐Santos, M., Dutra-Tavares, A. C., Paes‐Branco, D., Nunes‐Freitas, A. L., Manhães, A. C., Filgueiras, C. C., & Ribeiro‐Carvalho, A. (2016) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2016.06.002 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Nicotinic modulation of salience network connectivity and centrality in schizophrenia
Smucny, J., Wylie, K. P., Kronberg, E., Legget, K. T., & Tregellas, J. R. (2017) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.01.018 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Importantly, increased nicotinic receptor expression levels (tied to smoking) have been shown to normalize by 6 weeks in former smokers (Cosgrove et al., 2009).”
BackgroundGilbert, D. G., Rabinovich, N. E., Gilbert-Matuskowitz, E. A., Klein, K. P., & Pergadia, M. L. (2019) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000278 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
An audit of assessment and outcome of intervention at a quit smoking clinic in a homeless hostel
Power, J., Mallat, C., Bonevski, B., & Nielssen, O. B. (2015) · Australasian Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1039856215593396 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Semenova, S., Jin, X., McClure‐Begley, T. D., Tadman, M. P., Marks, M. J., & Markou, A. (2018) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2018.06.002 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Chronic cigarette smoking in humans leads to nAChR upregulation of high affinity α4β2* nicotine binding sites in the brain (Benwell et al., 1988; Breese et al., 1997; Cosgrove et al., 2009; Gentry and Lukas, 2002; Perry et al., 1999; Staley et al., 2006).”
BackgroundSPECT imaging of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in nonsmoking heavy alcohol drinking individuals
Esterlis, I., Cosgrove, K., Petrakis, I. L., McKee, S. A., Bois, F., Krantzler, E., Stiklus, S. M., Perry, E. B., Tamagnan, G. D., Seibyl, J. P., et al. (2010) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.006 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluation of (‐)‐[18 F]F lubatine‐specific binding: Implications for reference region approaches
Bhatt, S., Hillmer, A. T., Nabulsi, N., Matuskey, D., Lim, K., Lin, S.-F., Esterlis, I., Carson, R. E., Huang, Y. H., & Cosgrove, K. (2017) · Synapse · doi:10.1002/syn.22016 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“…of a4b2-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (a4b2*-nAChRs) with positron emission tomography (PET) has important clinical applications for studying addiction and other neuropsychiatric disorders (Cosgrove et al., 2009; Esterlis et al., 2014; Hannestad et al., 2013; Saricicek et al., 2012).”
Self-citationBetthauser, T. J., Hillmer, A. T., Lao, P. J., et al. (2017) · Nuclear Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.08.001 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of α4β2 nAChRs with 2-[18F]FA-85380 [2] and the single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) counterpart 5-[123I]IA-85380 [3] has yielded important findings in areas such as Alzheimer’s disease [4] and tobacco addiction [5].”
BackgroundEsterlis, I., Hillmer, A. T., Bois, F., Pittman, B. P., McGovern, E. M., O’Malley, S. S., Picciotto, M. R., Yang, B., Gelernter, J. E., & Cosgrove, K. (2016) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw081 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationDuncan, P. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139025515.013 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Keyworth, H. L., Georgiou, P., Zanos, P., Rueda, A. V. L., Chen, Y., Kitchen, I., Camarini, R., Cropley, M., & Bailey, A. (2017) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.14068 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Up-regulation of α4β2* nAChR following prolonged exposure to nicotine has been consistently shown in cigarette smokers (Breese et al., 1997; Cosgrove et al., 2009) and animal models of nicotine administration (e.”
BackgroundA Control Theory Model of Smoking
Bobashev, G., Holloway, J. W., Solano, E., & Gutkin, B. S. (2017) · doi:10.3768/rtipress.2017.op.0040.1706 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Following results in peer-reviewed literature (Cosgrove et al., 2009; Ward et al., 2001) that abstaining from smoking for a period longer than a month (90 days is recommended) is critical for long-term abstinence, we restricted access to cigarettes for more than 30 days but allowed for relapse.”
Poole, R. L., Connor, D. A., & Gould, T. J. (2014) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/bne0000003 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Translational Research in Nicotine DependencePreprint
Turner, J. R., Gold, A. B., Schnoll, R. A., & Blendy, J. A. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012153 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Lotfipour, S., Mandelkern, M. A., & Brody, A. L. (2011) · Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews · doi:10.2174/157340511795445676 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“The nAChR density returns to normal after a prolonged abstinence of weeks to months [60, 61].”
BackgroundThanos, P. K. (2012) · Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy · doi:10.4172/2155-6105.s6-007 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Smoking and Neuroimaging: A Review
Hedy Kober, A., & DeLeone, C. M. (2011) · Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports · doi:10.1007/s12170-011-0201-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Effects of ceftriaxone on conditioned nicotine reward in rats
Philogene-Khalid, H. L., Simmons, S. J., Muschamp, J. W., & Rawls, S. M. (2017) · Behavioural Pharmacology · doi:10.1097/fbp.0000000000000314 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Desensitization and upregulation of β2 subunit-containing nAChRs is evident following chronic nicotine use (Fenster et al., 1997, 1999; Cosgrove et al., 2009), and upregulation of β2 subunit-containing nAChRs persists throughout and underlies symptoms of nicotine withdrawal (for review, see Simmons…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Scientific Basis for the Regulation of Flavors in Tobacco Products
Bold, K. W., Kong, G., & O’Malley, S. S. (2024) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080921-075624 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationLuckhaus, C., Henning, U., Ferrea, S., Musso, F., Mobascher, A., & Winterer, G. (2011) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-011-0743-1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“At baseline culture condition, [(3)H]-nicotine binding on B-lymphoblasts was not statistically different between healthy smokers and never-smokers, which on first sight is not in line with earlier post-mortem, neuroimaging and peripheral leucocyte findings (Breese et al. 2000; Cormier et al. 2004; Staley et al. 2006;…”
ResultSimmons, S. J., Gentile, T. A., Mo, L., Tran, F. H., Ma, S., & Muschamp, J. W. (2016) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.07.053 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Smoking Cessation in Men and Women
Potter, A. (2014) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14081032 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“There is evidence that female smokers exhibit less nicotinic receptor up-regulation in the striatum than male smokers (10, 11).”
BackgroundTranslational Research in Nicotine AddictionPreprint
Fisher, M. L., Pauly, J. R., Froeliger, B., & Turner, J. R. (2020) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a039776 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cosgrove, K. P., Batis, J., Bois, F., Maciejewski, P. K., Esterlis, I., Kloczynski, T., Stiklus, S., Krishnan-Sarin, S., O’Malley, S., Perry, E., Tamagnan, G., Seibyl, J. P., & Staley, J. K.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2009-06-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 666
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2796827
- OpenAlex
- W2170069078
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Keywords
- receptor availability, nicotine withdrawal, cigarette craving, cerebellum, striatum, cortex, nicotine dependence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Azetidines, Brain, Brain Mapping, Dominance, Cerebral, Female
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review