Cited by 159Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

β2-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Availability During Acute and Prolonged Abstinence From Tobacco Smoking

Open access
Cosgrove, Kelly P., Batis, Jeffery, Bois, Frederic, Maciejewski, Paul K., Esterlis, Irina, Kloczynski, Tracy, Stiklus, Stephanie, Krishnan-Sarin, Suchitra +5 more·2009·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

CONTEXT: Available levels of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors containing the beta(2) subunit (beta(2)*-nAChR) are higher in recently abstinent tobacco smokers compared with participants who never smoked. Variations in beta(2)*-nAChR availability during the course of abstinence may be related to the urge to smoke, the extent of nicotine withdrawal, and successful abstinence. OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in beta(2)*-nAChR availability during acute and prolonged abstinence from tobacco smoking and to determine how changes in beta(2)*-nAChR availability were related to clinical features of tobacco smoking. DESIGN: Tobacco smokers participated in up to 4 iodide 123-labeled 5-iodo-A-85380 ([(123)I]5-IA) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans during abstinence at 1 day (n = 7) and 1 (n = 17), 2 (n = 7), 4 (n = 11), and 6 to 12 (n = 6) weeks. Age-matched nonsmokers participated in a single [(123)I]5-IA SPECT scan. All participants completed 1 magnetic resonance imaging study. SETTING: Academic imaging center. PARTICIPANTS: Tobacco smokers (n = 19) and an age-matched nonsmoker comparison group (n = 20). Main Outcome Measure The [(123)I]5-IA SPECT images were converted to distribution volume and were analyzed using regions of interest. RESULTS: Compared with nonsmokers, beta(2)*-nAChR availability in the striatum, cortex, and cerebellum of smokers was not different at 1 day of abstinence, was significantly higher at 1 week of abstinence, and was not different at 4 or at 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence. In smokers, beta(2)*-nAChR availability was significantly lower in the cortex and cerebellum at 6 to 12 weeks compared with 1 week of abstinence. In addition, cerebellar beta(2)*-nAChR availability at 4 weeks of abstinence was positively correlated with craving on the day of the SPECT scan. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that higher beta(2)*-nAChR availability persists up to 1 month of abstinence and normalizes to nonsmoker levels by 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence from tobacco smoking. These marked and persistent changes in beta(2)*-nAChR availability may contribute to difficulties with tobacco cessation.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In tobacco smokers, β2*-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor availability was not different from nonsmokers at 1 day of abstinence, significantly higher at 1 week, and normalized by 6–12 weeks. Higher cerebellar receptor availability at 4 weeks was positively correlated with same-day craving.

Key findings

  • Compared with nonsmokers, smokers at 1 week of abstinence had significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability in striatum (+22%), cortex (+21% to +29%), and cerebellum (+24%); at 1 day, thalamic availability was significantly lower (−26%, p=.002), and at 4 weeks only occipital cortex remained significantly higher (+18%, p=.005).
  • Among smoker groups, 6–12 weeks of abstinence was associated with significantly lower availability than 1 week in parietal cortex (p=.033), frontal cortex (p=.039), anterior cingulate (p=.014), occipital cortex (p=.019), and cerebellum (p=.016).
  • Cerebellar β2*-nAChR availability at 4 weeks was positively correlated with craving on the day of scan: QSU-Intent rho=0.74, p=.01; QSU-Relief rho=0.74, p=.01.
  • Baseline QSU-Intent correlated negatively with 1-day abstinence availability in thalamus (rho=−0.90, p=.006) and parietal cortex (rho=−0.88, p=.008); no significant correlations were found with nicotine withdrawal (MNWS).

Methods

  • Nineteen tobacco smokers (9 men, 10 women; 41.1±9.0 years) and 20 age-matched nonsmokers (9 men, 11 women; 42.4±9.8 years) underwent [123I]5-IA SPECT; smokers completed up to 4 scans grouped at 1 day (n=7), 1 week (n=17), 2 weeks (n=7), 4 weeks (n=11), and 6–12 weeks (n=6) of abstinence, plus MRI for coregistration.
  • [123I]5-IA was given as a bolus-to-constant-infusion ratio of 7.0 for 8 hours; regional outcome was VT/fP, analyzed with regions of interest by two raters (inter-rater variability <12%).
  • Between-group comparisons used two-sample t-tests and repeated-measures mixed-effects models with group as a fixed effect and compound symmetry covariance; post hoc tests were Bonferroni-corrected at p≤0.00625, and correlations used Spearman’s rho with significance at p≤0.01.

Limitations

  • The paper states that [123I]5-IA measures β2-subunit availability, primarily α4β2, but other nAChR subunits also contribute; different β2*-subunit combinations are differentially regulated, and β3 and α7 subunits were not measured. It also states there is no appropriate reference region, so nondisplaceable [123I]5-IA uptake could not be measured.
  • The paper states that subjects reported mild-to-moderate nicotine withdrawal symptoms at baseline and throughout, so withdrawal-related results require replication in a larger sample with a greater range of withdrawal symptoms.
  • Evident from the text: group sizes were small and unequal, especially at 1 day (n=7) and 6–12 weeks (n=6); some smokers contributed observations to more than one abstinence group; individual changes in receptor availability were highly variable (up to 48% in cortex vs less than 5% in others); and some baseline QSU data were missing, limiting correlation analyses.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.41

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

30 of 69 cited sources checked · 24 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    β2*-nAChR availability is higher in recently abstinent smokers compared to never smokers.

    “β2*-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (β2*-nAChR) availability is higher in recently abstinent smokers compared to never smokers.”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusions · boosted
      “Previously, we demonstrated in vivo higher β2-subunit containing nAChR (β2*-nAChR) availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers compared to nonsmokers8.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, et al. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8707–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • Findingcitation
    § Results

    The difference between recently abstinent smokers and never smokers in the previous study was of greater magnitude (26-36% in cerebral cortex and 27% in striatum) than in the current study (21-29% in cerebral cortex and 22% in striatum).

    “The difference between recently abstinent smokers and never smokers in the previous study8 was of a greater magnitude, e.g., 26-36% in the cerebral cortex and 27% in the striatum, than in the current study, e.g., 21-29% in the cerebral cortex and 22% in the striatum.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, et al. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8707–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • Premisecitation
    § Results

    Smokers experience craving within 2 h of their last cigarette despite continued occupancy of the receptor by nicotine.

    “Smokers experience craving within 2 h of their last cigarette despite continued occupancy of the receptor by nicotine13.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, London ED, et al. Cigarette smoking saturates brain alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:907–15. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      The Results report that roughly half of presmoking craving had returned 2.5 hours after one cigarette, while estimated nicotine occupancy of α4β2* receptors remained about 90%. They do not establish that craving returned within 2 hours, as the citing sentence says (page unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § Results

    The β2*-subtype does not play a critical role in the physical symptoms of nicotine withdrawal.

    “This is consistent with the preclinical literature suggesting that the β2*-subtype does not play a critical role in the physical symptoms of nicotine withdrawal33, 76.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [33] Besson M, David V, Suarez S, et al. Genetic dissociation of two behaviors associated with nicotine addiction: beta-2 containing nicotinic receptors are involved in nicotine reinforcement but not in withdrawal syndrome. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;187:189–99. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0418-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [76] Jackson KJ, Martin BR, Changeux JP, Damaj MI. Differential role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits in physical and affective nicotine withdrawal signs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;325:302–12. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.132977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • Premisecitation
    § Conclusions

    Higher β2*-nAChR availability is thought to functionally reflect higher numbers of desensitized receptors.

    “Higher β2*-nAChR availability is thought to functionally reflect higher numbers of desensitized receptors13, 14.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, London ED, et al. Cigarette smoking saturates brain alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:907–15. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      The Results (COMMENT; page unavailable) suggest that prolonged desensitization may cause receptor up-regulation in smokers, supporting a possible link between receptor numbers and desensitization. The paper does not establish that higher measured β2*-nAChR availability reflects a higher number of receptors currently desensitized; its direct finding concerns nicotine occupancy and associated desensitization. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [14] Picciotto MR, Addy NA, Mineur YS, Brunzell DH. It is not “either/or”: Activation and desensitization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors both contribute to behaviors related to nicotine addiction and mood. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • May combine two claims. 32
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Conclusions

    Smoking one cigarette led to greater than 88% receptor occupancy, suggesting that smokers maintain saturation of β2*-nAChRs over the day.

    “Additionally, smoking one cigarette led to greater than 88% receptor occupancy13 suggesting that smokers maintain saturation of β2*-nAChRs over the day.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, London ED, et al. Cigarette smoking saturates brain alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:907–15. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Results

    Both nicotine and cotinine have been shown to facilitate dopamine release.

    “both nicotine59 and cotinine60 have been shown to facilitate dopamine release”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [59] Benwell ME, Balfour DJ. The effects of acute and repeated nicotine treatment on nucleus accumbens dopamine and locomotor activity. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;105:849–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb09067.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [60] Dwoskin LP, Teng L, Buxton ST, Crooks PA. (S)-(-)-Cotinine, the major brain metabolite of nicotine, stimulates nicotinic receptors to evoke [3H]dopamine release from rat striatal slices in a calcium-dependent manner. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;288:905–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Conclusions

    Higher β2*-nAChR availability in smokers may be due to increased assembly of α4 and β2 subunits in endoplasmic reticulum, increased transport of receptors to membrane, decreased receptor turnover, and/or presence of nicotine promoting intracellular maturation of α4β2-nAChR to high-affinity conformation.

    “Higher β2*-nAChR availability in smokers may be due to a variety of molecular changes including increased assembly of α4 and β2 subunits in the endoplasmic reticulum9, increased transport of receptors to the membrane10, decreased receptor turnover11, and/or the presence of nicotine promoting intracellular maturation of the α4β2-nAChR to a high-affinity conformation12.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] Nashmi R, Dickinson ME, McKinney S, et al. Assembly of alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors assessed with functional fluorescently labeled subunits: effects of localization, trafficking, and nicotine-induced upregulation in clonal mammalian cells and in cultured midbrain neurons. J Neurosci. 2003;23:11554–67. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-37-11554.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [10] Harkness PC, Millar NS. Changes in conformation and subcellular distribution of alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors revealed by chronic nicotine treatment and expression of subunit chimeras. J Neurosci. 2002;22:10172–81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-23-10172.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [11] Peng X, Gerzanich V, Anand R, Whiting P, Lindstrom J. Nicotine-induced increase in neuronal nicotinic receptor results from a decrease in the rate of receptor turnover. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;46:523–530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    Smokers at one week of abstinence have significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability in the cortex, striatum and cerebellum, but not thalamus, compared to nonsmokers.

    “Consistent with our previous study8 we report significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability in smokers at one week of abstinence in the cortex, striatum and cerebellum, but not thalamus compared to nonsmokers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, et al. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8707–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Results

    A previous study found a negative correlation between the urge to smoke to relieve withdrawal symptoms and β2*-nAChR availability in the sensorimotor cortex at approximately 1 week of abstinence.

    “We previously found a negative correlation between the urge to smoke to relieve withdrawal symptoms and β2*-nAChR availability in the sensorimotor cortex at approximately 1 week of abstinence8.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, et al. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8707–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Conclusions

    [123I]5-IA is a nicotinic agonist that binds with high affinity to the nicotine binding site on nAChRs that contain the β2-subunit.

    “[123I]5-IA is a nicotinic agonist that binds with high affinity to the nicotine binding site on nAChR that contain the β2-subunit39.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Mukhin A, Gundisch D, Horti A, et al. 5-Iodo-A-85380, an α4β2 subtype-selective ligand for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 2000;57:642–649. doi: 10.1124/mol.57.3.642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      The available indexed passages are BindingDB ligand listings (no section or page given), not passages describing the paper’s receptor-binding or functional findings. Searches for 5-iodo-A-85380 agonism, β2-containing receptors, and the nicotine binding site found no passage that establishes the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Results

    The previous study had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability in all regions at 4 hr of abstinence compared to nonsmokers, while the current study reports lower thalamic but similar β2*-nAChR availability in the striatum, cerebellum and throughout the cortex compared to the nonsmoker group at 1 day of abstinence.

    “One difference is that the previous study18 had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability in all regions at 4 hr of abstinence compared to the nonsmokers, while the current study reports lower thalamic but similar β2*-nAChR availability in the striatum, cerebellum and throughout the cortex compared to the nonsmoker group at 1 day of abstinence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Results

    Our data extend the findings of previous studies which showed that the upregulation of the β2*-nAChR in recently abstinent tobacco smokers was temporary and could be measured with [123I]5-IA SPECT imaging.

    “In summary, our data extend the findings of previous studies8, 18 which showed that the upregulation of the β2*-nAChR in recently abstinent tobacco smokers was temporary and could be measured with [123I]5-IA SPECT imaging.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [8] Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, et al. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8707–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      The Results report higher β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent smokers than in nonsmokers, measured with [123I]5-IA SPECT. The study does not establish that this upregulation was temporary in human smokers; it imaged them during early abstinence rather than following receptor levels over time. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Results

    A previous study reported significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability at 21 days of abstinence compared to 10 days of abstinence.

    “Additionally, they reported significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability at 21 days of abstinence compared to 10 days of abstinence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Results

    Different β2*-subunit combinations appear to be differentially regulated by nicotine, with α3/α6 and α6α4β2* and α5α4β2* not upregulating or decreasing in response to nicotine while α6β2 (nonα4) nAChR increase in response to nicotine.

    “Importantly, different β2*-subunit combinations appear to be differentially regulated by nicotine, with α3/α6 and α6α4β2* and α5α4β2* not upregulating or decreasing in response to nicotine38, 85-88 while α6β2 (nonα4) nAChR increase in response to nicotine88.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [38] Mao D, Perry DC, Yasuda RP, Wolfe BB, Kellar KJ. The alpha4beta2alpha5 nicotinic cholinergic receptor in rat brain is resistant to up-regulation by nicotine in vivo. J Neurochem. 2008;104:446–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [85] Lai A, Parameswaran N, Khwaja M, et al. Long-term nicotine treatment decreases striatal alpha 6* nicotinic acetylcholine receptor sites and function in mice. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67:1639–47. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.006429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [86] McCallum SE, Parameswaran N, Bordia T, Fan H, McIntosh JM, Quik M. Differential regulation of mesolimbic alpha 3/alpha 6 beta 2 and alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor sites and function after long-term oral nicotine to monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;318:381–8. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.104414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [87] McCallum SE, Parameswaran N, Bordia T, et al. Increases in alpha4* but not alpha3*/alpha6* nicotinic receptor sites and function in the primate striatum following chronic oral nicotine treatment. J Neurochem. 2006;96:1028–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [88] Perez XA, Bordia T, McIntosh JM, Grady SR, Quik M. Long-term nicotine treatment differentially regulates striatal alpha6alpha4beta2* and alpha6(Nonalpha4)beta2* nAChR expression and function. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;74:844–53. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.048843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      The Introduction and Discussion report that chronic nicotine decreased striatal α6α4β2* receptors and increased α6(nonα4)β2* receptors in rodents. The Introduction also reports no change in α4α5β2 receptors, but the passages found do not address the claimed α3/α6 combination. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Results

    Higher β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers compared to nonsmokers is temporary.

    “This study is also consistent with a previous study18 demonstrating that higher β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers compared to nonsmokers is temporary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Results

    Compared to nonsmokers, smokers had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability at 4 hr of abstinence, significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability at 10 days of abstinence, and similar β2*-nAChR availability at 21 days of abstinence.

    “Specifically, compared to nonsmokers, smokers had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability at 4 hr of abstinence, significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability at 10 days of abstinence, and similar β2*-nAChR availability at 21 days of abstinence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, et al. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1829–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    There were no differences in total parent or fP between groups at other time points, or in free parent between groups at any time point.

    “There were no differences in total parent (kBq/mL) or fP between groups at other time points, or between groups at any time point in free parent (kBq/mL).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    There were significant differences in QSU-Intent and QSU-Relief, but not MNWS, between groups of abstinent smokers.

    “There were significant differences in QSU-Intent (F[4,25]=7.41, p<0.015) and QSU Relief (F[4,25]=5.63, p=0.002), but not in MNWS scores (F[4,25]=0.33, p=0.857), between groups of abstinent smokers (Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    There were significant differences in total parent between nonsmokers and 1-day abstinent smokers, and in fP between nonsmokers and 2-week abstinent smokers.

    “There were significant differences in total parent (kBq/mL) between nonsmokers and 1 day abstinent smokers and in fP between nonsmokers and 2 week abstinent smokers (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    The current study indicates that on average, β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers does not normalize until between 4-12 weeks, although this is highly variable between individuals.

    “and, the current study indicates that on average, β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers does not normalize until between 4-12 weeks, although, this is highly variable between individuals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Results

    Smokers who participated in scans at different times since last cigarette were equivalent in age, level of nicotine dependence (FTND), cigarettes per day, and years of smoking.

    “Smokers who participated in scans at different times since the last cigarette were equivalent in age, level of nicotine dependence (as assessed by the FTND at intake), cigarettes smoked per day, and years of smoking (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Results

    Plasma cotinine and nicotine levels and carbon monoxide measurements were negligible in nonsmokers and in smokers were highest at 1 day of abstinence and decreased over time, confirming abstinence from smoking.

    “Plasma cotinine and nicotine levels and carbon monoxide measurements were negligible in nonsmokers and in smokers were highest at 1 day of abstinence and decreased over time, confirming abstinence from smoking (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Conclusions

    Imaging with [123I]5-IA SPECT in nonhuman primate and human subjects results in a binding pattern consistent with the established regional distribution of β2-nAChR and is highest in the thalamus and intermediate throughout the cortex and cerebellum.

    “Imaging with [123I]5-IA SPECT in nonhuman primate and human subjects results in a binding pattern that is consistent with the established regional distribution of β2-nAChR and is highest in the thalamus and intermediate throughout the cortex and cerebellum43, 44.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [43] Staley JK, van Dyck CH, Weinzimmer D, et al. 123I-5-IA-85380 SPECT measurement of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in human brain by the constant infusion paradigm: feasibility and reproducibility. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1466–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [44] Chefer S, Horti A, Lee K, et al. In vivo imaging of brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with 5-[123I]iodo-A-85830 using single photon emission computed tomography. Life Sci. 1998;63:355–360. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(98)00514-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Conclusions

    Higher β2*-nAChR availability persists up to 1 month of abstinence, and normalizes to nonsmoker levels by 6-12 weeks of abstinence from tobacco smoking.

    “These data suggest higher β2*-nAChR availability persists up to 1 month of abstinence, and normalizes to nonsmoker levels by 6-12 weeks of abstinence from tobacco smoking.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “Second, the normalization of the β2*-nAChR is prolonged, requiring up to 6-12 weeks of abstinence to fully return to nonsmoker levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    Subjects who reported high baseline craving likely smoked more cigarettes immediately prior to their quit day and had lower receptor availability at 1 day of abstinence.

    “Thus, we believe that subjects who reported high baseline craving, likely smoked more cigarettes immediately prior to their quit day and had lower receptor availability at 1 day of abstinence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Conclusions

    [123I]5-IA demonstrates low nonspecific binding, acceptable dosimetry in human subjects, high brain uptake, and good test-retest reproducibility.

    “This ligand demonstrates low nonspecific binding40 and has acceptable dosimetry in human subjects with high brain uptake41, 42 and good test-retest reproducibility43.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [40] Horti A, Koren A, Lee K, et al. Radiosynthesis and preliminary evaluation of 5-[123/125I]iodo-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine: a radioligand for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nucl Med Biol. 1999;26:175–182. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(98)00086-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [41] Fujita M, Seibyl JP, Vaupel DB, et al. Whole-body biodistribution, radiation absorbed dose, and brain SPET imaging with [123i]5-i-A-85380 in healthy human subjects. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:183–90. doi: 10.1007/s00259-001-0695-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [42] Ueda M, Iida Y, Mukai T, et al. 5-[123I]Iodo-A-85380: assessment of pharmacological safety, radiation dosimetry and SPECT imaging of brain nicotinic receptors in healthy human subjects. Annals of Nuclear Medicine. 2004;18:337–344. doi: 10.1007/BF02984473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Methods

    Two raters conducted the image analysis, and variability between raters was <12% across regions of interest; the mean of the two raters is reported.

    “Two raters conducted the analysis. Variability between raters was <12 % across regions-of-interest. The mean of the analysis from the two raters is reported.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Results

    [123I]5-IA is metabolized in the liver by enzymes in the cytochrome P450 family, such as CYP2A6, CYP2B6, and CYP2D6.

    “Consistently, we expect that [123I]5-IA is metabolized in the liver by enzymes in the cytochrome P450 family, such as CYP2A6, which acts on nicotine, and CYP2B6 and CYP2D6, which catalyze the dealkylation of aromatic ethers56, 57.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [56] Baldwin RM, Zoghbi SS, Staley JK, et al. Chemical fate of the nicotinic acetylcholinergic radiotracer [123I]5-IA-85380 in baboon brain and plasma. Nucl Med Biol. 2006;33:549–54. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [57] Lewis DF. Human cytochromes P450 associated with the phase 1 metabolism of drugs and other xenobiotics: a compilation of substrates and inhibitors of the CYP1, CYP2 and CYP3 families. Curr Med Chem. 2003;10:1955–72. doi: 10.2174/0929867033456855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Methods

    Nonsmoking status was confirmed by plasma cotinine levels <15 ng/mL, urine cotinine levels <100 ng/mL, and carbon monoxide levels <11 ppm on the day of intake and day of scan.

    “Nonsmoking status, was confirmed by plasma cotinine levels <15 ng/mL, urine cotinine levels <100 ng/mL and carbon monoxide levels <11 ppm on the day of intake and day of scan.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Results

    There were no differences between groups in injected dose, bolus to infusion ratio, or time of scan.

    “There were no differences between groups in injected dose, bolus to infusion ratio, or time of scan (data not shown).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    The physical action of smoking a cigarette is likely to be critically tied to craving during abstinence.

    “Thus, the physical action of smoking a cigarette is likely to be critically tied to craving during abstinence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    Craving for cigarettes may elicit preparation for action or voluntary movement, goal directed actions (e.g., lighting a cigarette, bringing a cigarette up to the mouth) and/or motor imagery which are linked to the motor system.

    “so that craving for cigarettes may elicit preparation for action or voluntary movement, goal directed actions (e.g., lighting a cigarette, bringing a cigarette up to the mouth) and/or motor imagery which are linked to the motor system66, 67.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [66] Porro CA, Francescato MP, Cettolo V, et al. Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 1996;16:7688–98. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-23-07688.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [67] Cunnington R, Windischberger C, Deecke L, Moser E. The preparation and readiness for voluntary movement: a high-field event-related fMRI study of the Bereitschafts-BOLD response. Neuroimage. 2003;20:404–12. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00291-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Conclusions

    Nicotine-induced increases in nAChR (upregulation) are conferred by a specific microdomain in the β2-subunit and are confined to nAChRs that contain the β2-subunit.

    “Importantly, nicotine induced increases in nAChR, termed “upregulation”, are conferred by a specific microdomain that is in the β2-subunit 34 and thus this upregulation is confined to nAChR that contain the β2-subunit4, 19, 31, 35-38.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [34] Sallette J, Bohler S, Benoit P, et al. An extracellular protein microdomain controls upregulation of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by nicotine. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:18767–18775. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308260200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [4] Nguyen HN, Rasmussen BA, Perry DC. Subtype-selective up-regulation by chronic nicotine of high-affinity nicotinic receptors in rat brain demonstrated by receptor autoradiography. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;307:1090–7. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.056408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [19] Flores C, Rogers S, Pabreza L, Wolfe B, Kellar K. A subtype of nicotinic cholinergic receptor in rat brain is composed of alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits and is up-regulated by chronic nicotine treatment. Mol Pharmacol. 1992;41:31–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Methods

    Subjects were given structured interviews using SCID to rule out any Axis I Disorder except Nicotine Dependence.

    “Subjects were given structured interviews using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID) to rule out any Axis I Disorder except for Nicotine Dependence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    The discrepancy between previous and current correlations may be due to differences in correlational analysis methods, such as voxel-based analyses in the previous study versus Spearman's rho correlations with regions-of-interest in the current study.

    “This discrepancy may be due to differences in correlational analysis methods, e.g., voxel-based analyses in the previous study versus spearman's rho correlations with regions-of-interest in the current study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Voxel-based analyses may be more sensitive to detecting significance in smaller brain regions.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Methods

    There is no appropriate reference region for [123I]5-IA, so nondisplaceable uptake could not be measured.

    “As described previously43, there is no appropriate reference region for this radiotracer, so nondisplaceable [123I]5-IA uptake could not be measured.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] Staley JK, van Dyck CH, Weinzimmer D, et al. 123I-5-IA-85380 SPECT measurement of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in human brain by the constant infusion paradigm: feasibility and reproducibility. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1466–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Methods

    Smoking status was confirmed by plasma cotinine levels >150 ng/mL, urine cotinine levels >100 ng/mL, and carbon monoxide levels >11 on the day of intake.

    “Smoking status was confirmed by plasma cotinine levels >150 ng/mL, urine cotinine levels >100 ng/mL and carbon monoxide levels >11 on the day of intake.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Methods

    VT/fP is proportional to binding potential, which is proportional to receptor number at equilibrium, given no change in affinity and no difference in nondisplaceable uptake between subjects or comparison groups.

    “VT/fP is proportional to the binding potential (BP, mL/g=Bmax/KD), which is proportional to the receptor number (Bmax) at equilibrium, given the assumptions that there is no change in affinity (KD) and that nondisplaceable (nonspecific and free) uptake does not differ between subjects or comparison groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Innis RB, Cunningham VJ, Delforge J, et al. Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1533–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • The authors state this as an assumption: There is no change in affinity (KD) of [123I]5-IA for β2*-nAChR.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Nondisplaceable (nonspecific and free) uptake of [123I]5-IA does not differ between subjects or comparison groups.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Methods

    A 57Co-distributed source was measured with each experiment to control for day-to-day variation in camera sensitivity.

    “A 57Co-distributed source was measured with each experiment to control for day-to-day variation in camera sensitivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § Results

    In radiotracer imaging studies it is imperative that brain uptake is corrected for radiotracer metabolism, since differences in metabolism determine how much radiotracer is available to the brain.

    “In radiotracer imaging studies it is imperative that brain uptake is corrected for radiotracer metabolism, since differences in metabolism of the radiotracer determine how much radiotracer is available to the brain, e.g., fast metabolizers will have less radiotracer available to brain, while slow metabolizers will have more radiotracer available to brain for a given dose.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    Nicotine or another chemical in tobacco smoke may have changed the metabolism of the radiotracer, resulting in lower total parent at 1 day of abstinence.

    “This highlights the impact of nicotine or another chemical in tobacco smoke on metabolism, e.g., because nicotine was still present, it may have changed the metabolism of the radiotracer, resulting in lower total parent at 1 day of abstinence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Methods

    Use of mixed-effects regression models accounted for observations between abstinent smoker groups that were not entirely independent.

    “These between group differences were evaluated using repeated measures, mixed-effects models in order to account for the observations between abstinent smoker groups that were not entirely independent, given that some abstinent smokers contribute observations to more than one group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    This is consistent with the clinical course of tobacco smoking in which craving, withdrawal symptoms, and risk for relapse are prolonged.

    “This is consistent with the clinical course of tobacco smoking in which craving, withdrawal symptoms, and risk for relapse are prolonged.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    Differences in time course changes may be due to differences in dosing regimen, chronicity of nicotine, route of administration, metabolism between species, specificity of the radioligand, or sex and/or genetic differences in nAChR subunit expression and composition of nicotinic agonist binding sites.

    “The differences in the time course changes may be due to differences in dosing regimen, chronicity of nicotine, route of administration, metabolism between species, specificity of the radioligand, or sex and/or genetic differences in nAChR subunit expression and composition of nicotinic agonist binding sites”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    nAChR subunit expression varies regionally, and differential regulation of these distinct subunit combinations that are measured by a single nicotinic agonist ligand such as [123I]5-IA will result in regional differences in the degree of upregulation in smokers and the degree of receptor normalization during abstinence.

    “Notably, nAChR subunit expression varies regionally, and differential regulation of these distinct subunit combinations that are measured by a single nicotinic agonist ligand such as [123I]5-IA will result in regional differences in the degree of upregulation in smokers and the degree of receptor normalization during abstinence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Results

    [123I]5-IA measures the availability of the β2-subunit of the nAChR, primarily the α4β2-subunit, but other subunits also contribute to the regulation of the nAChR by tobacco smoking.

    “One limitation of this study is that [123I]5-IA measures the availability of the β2-subunit of the nAChR, primarily the α4β2-subunit, but other subunits also contribute to the regulation of the nAChR by tobacco smoking.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    The difference at 4 hr versus 24 hours is likely due to high levels of residual nicotine or metabolites present in the brain at 4 hr of abstinence, resulting in lower β2*-nAChR availability.

    “This is interesting and likely due to high levels of residual nicotine or metabolites present in the brain at 4 hr of abstinence (versus ∼24 hours in the current study) resulting in lower β2*-nAChR availability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    The preclinical studies support a process of prolonged normalization when we consider that 1-3 weeks is substantial in the life span of a rodent.

    “The preclinical studies support a process of prolonged normalization when we consider that 1-3 weeks is substantial in the life span of a rodent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    We are likely measuring the β2-subunit in combination with α3-6 subunits, leaving the in vivo measurement of the β3-subunit and α7-subunit for the future.

    “Thus, we are likely measuring the β2-subunit in combination with α3-6 subunits leaving the in vivo measurement of the β3-subunit and α7-subunit for the future, with further radiotracer development.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Results

    The β2-subunit has been linked primarily to the reinforcing effects of nicotine and combines with the α3-6 subunits.

    “Notably, the β2-subunit has been linked primarily to the reinforcing effects of nicotine22, 83, 84 and combines with the α3-6 subunits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [22] Picciotto M, Zoli M, Rimondin R, et al. Acetycholine receptors containing the beta2 subunit are involved in the reinforcing properties of nicotine. Nature. 1998;391:173–177. doi: 10.1038/34413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [83] Walters CL, Brown S, Changeux JP, Martin B, Damaj MI. The beta2 but not alpha7 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is required for nicotine-conditioned place preference in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;184:339–44. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0295-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
    • cites [84] Brunzell DH, Chang JR, Schneider B, Olausson P, Taylor JR, Picciotto MR. beta2-Subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are involved in nicotine-induced increases in conditioned reinforcement but not progressive ratio responding for food in C57BL/6 mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;184:328–38. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0099-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    The conflict between human and postmortem/animal studies may be due to differences in methodology or the higher relative dose of nicotine in the postmortem and animal studies.

    “In general, this may be due to differences in methodology or the higher relative dose of nicotine in the postmortem and animal studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
47 of 47
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is no change in affinity (KD) of [123I]5-IA for β2*-nAChR.

    “given the assumptions that there is no change in affinity (KD)”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Nondisplaceable (nonspecific and free) uptake of [123I]5-IA does not differ between subjects or comparison groups.

    “and that nondisplaceable (nonspecific and free) uptake does not differ between subjects or comparison groups.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    [123I]5-IA administered at a “trace” dose (<1% occupancy) does not interfere with receptor and cell function.

    “Because [123I]5-IA is administered at a “trace” dose (<1% occupancy) for SPECT imaging it does not interfere with receptor and cell function.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Voxel-based analyses may be more sensitive to detecting significance in smaller brain regions.

    “Voxel-based analyses may be more sensitive to detecting significance in smaller brain regions, but that was beyond the scope of the current study.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • One-day post hoc comparisons are called significant above the stated threshold

    Major

    The reported corrected p-values of 0.007 and 0.023 both exceed the paper's stated post hoc significance threshold of 0.00625, yet both comparisons are called significant.

  • Abstract overlooks a significant four-week cortical difference

    Minor

    The abstract says cortical availability was not different from nonsmokers at four weeks, while the Results report significantly higher availability in the occipital cortex at that time.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [83]Walters CL, Brown S, Changeux JP, Martin B, Damaj MI. The beta2 but not alpha7 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is required for nicotine-conditioned place preference in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;184:339–44. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0295-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  2. [84]Brunzell DH, Chang JR, Schneider B, Olausson P, Taylor JR, Picciotto MR. beta2-Subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are involved in nicotine-induced increases in conditioned reinforcement but not progressive ratio responding for food in C57BL/6 mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;184:328–38. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0099-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cosgrove, K. P., Batis, J., Bois, F., Maciejewski, P. K., Esterlis, I., Kloczynski, T., Stiklus, S., Krishnan-Sarin, S., O’Malley, S., Perry, E., Tamagnan, G., Seibyl, J. P., & Staley, J. K.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
66
Issue
6
Pages
666
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170069078
Cited by
159
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
receptor availability, nicotine withdrawal, cigarette craving, cerebellum, striatum, cortex, nicotine dependence
MeSH terms
Adult, Azetidines, Brain, Brain Mapping, Dominance, Cerebral, Female

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review